So an illegal immigrant can walk up and fill out a first time voter registration at poll site and then vote. Since they just registered the signature will match the voter card. Verification done. They make sure whatever address they put on form is in the precinct they are voting in. That’s it. They need no ID or proof of anything. That’s how the Dems cheat. @DOJCrimDiv
I shall take more than 50% of your hard-earned money from you. Because I'm kind and empathetic, I'll give you a check of $100. Now STFU Canadian, and be grateful. - @MarkJCarney
In the minds of California Democrats everything is a “threat to Democracy” except for: third parties collecting limitless ballots, no ID verification, votes left unattended in ballot boxes which may or may not be set on fire, ballots cast by drugged out homeless people, and a month long after Election Day counting period so opaque it would make poll workers from the former Soviet Union blush.
Sending ballots in the mail to people who moved out of California years ago is corrupt.
Sending ballots in the mail to people who didn’t request one is corrupt.
Sending ballots in the mail to every address someone has lived in for the past 10 years is corrupt.
Letting activists sign up mentally unstable people for a ballot by using phony addresses is corrupt.
Not letting third party law enforcement officials check the voter rolls is corrupt.
Letting one political party control the entire process for decades leads to corruption.
If you have witnessed potential election fraud, we want to hear from you.
People have been contacting our office wanting to provide information. We have established a dedicated email address for this purpose.
Email tips to: [email protected]
Please do not send rumors, theories, or second-hand information. We require direct evidence. Examples of what to report:
• A ballot arrived at your home for someone who has never lived there.
• You were told someone already voted in your name.
• You witnessed someone filling out ballots for others without their knowledge.
Ana Kasparian: "We spent $13B in Los Angeles alone last year to combat homelessness. You wanna know where that money went? That money went to these trash nonprofits who have a bunch of executives making half a million a year."
So for two nights in a row, Raman an obscure and largely unknown candidate has received more mail in votes than the leader Karen Bass?
Yeah that's not real.
They're only doing this so she can pass Pratt.
100% fake.
@EndWokeness CALIFRAUDNIA!
How can a candidate (Nithya Raman) who was getting 21% of the votes on election night suddenly go up to 40% of the votes days after the election? Can the Supreme Court intervene and cancel the election for what is an obvious organized fraud to eliminate Pratt?
@libsoftiktok CALIFRAUDNIA!
How can a candidate (Nithya Raman) who was getting 21% of the votes on election night, suddenly go up to 40% of the votes days after the election? Can the Supreme Court intervene and cancel the election for what is an obvious organized fraud to eliminate Pratt?
@bennyjohnson CALIFRAUDNIA!
How can a candidate (Nithya Raman) who was getting 21% of the votes on election night, suddenly go up to 40% of the votes days after the election? Can the Supreme Court intervene and cancel the election for what is an obvious organized fraud to eliminate Pratt?
@nypost CALIFRAUDNIA!
How can a candidate (Nithya Raman) who was getting 21% of the votes on election night, suddenly go up to 40% of the votes days after the election? Can the Supreme Court intervene and cancel the election for what is an obvious organized fraud to eliminate Pratt?
@ksorbs CALIFRAUDNIA!
How can a candidate (Nithya Raman) who was getting 21% of the votes on election night, suddenly go up to 40% of the votes days after the election? Can the Supreme Court intervene and cancel the election for what is an obvious organized fraud to eliminate Pratt?
@EricLDaugh CALIFRAUDNIA!
How can a candidate (Nithya Raman) who was getting 21% of the votes on election night, suddenly go up to 40% of the votes days after the election? Can the Supreme Court intervene and cancel the election for what is an obvious organized fraud to eliminate Pratt?
@ABC7 CALIFRAUDNIA!
How can a candidate (Nithya Raman) who was getting 21% of the votes on election night, suddenly go up to 40% of the votes days after the election? Can the Supreme Court intervene and cancel the election for what is an obvious organized fraud to eliminate Pratt?
@KTLA CALIFRAUDNIA!
How can a candidate (Nithya Raman) who was getting 21% of the votes on election night, suddenly go up to 40% of the votes days after the election? Can the Supreme Court intervene and cancel the election for what is an obvious organized fraud to eliminate Pratt?
@latimes CALIFRAUDNIA!
How can a candidate (Nithya Raman) who was getting 21% of the votes on election night, suddenly go up to 40% of the votes days after the election? Can the Supreme Court intervene and cancel the election for what is an obvious organized fraud to eliminate Pratt?
@EricLDaugh CALIFRAUDNIA!
How can a candidate (Nithya Raman) who was getting 21% of the votes on election night, suddenly go up to 40% of the votes days after the election? Can the Supreme Court intervene and cancel the election for what is an obvious organized fraud to eliminate Pratt?
@GuntherEagleman The elections in Califraudnia are always rigged by massive mail in ballots sent to illegal voters, and the harvesting of those ballots by Democrats-paid NGOs.