I seldom get into personal attacks on political opponents as you know CM @vdsatheesan .
But in @RahulGandhi 's case , I am compelled to, as most Indians are.
Let me explain why.
Rahuls politics since being thrown out by tired, angry voters in 2014, consists solely of and is built on lies, insults and divisiveness.
His politics tears down country and countrys institutions constantly, slander and abuse against our PM, uses lies about govt and bjp, spreads misinformation - all the while his party presides over epic corruption and malgovernance of UPA era type in states they are in government.
I have absolutely no reservation or hesitation in referring to Rahul and his politics -as politics built on fraud and corruption and him as a fraud. Even more so after his latest drama where he referred to Indias elected PM and Election commission as "deshdrohis". That is what should be condemned.
Any sensible person (non-Congress) will conclude the same - that Rahul is a fraud- after ydays very clear statement by @ECISVEEP . if you hvnt read it, you should.
Respect in politics has to be earned - through sincere hard work and service for country. Throughout Rahuls dynasty entitled "career" , he has done neither.
Your views of #SIR are certainly not consistent with senior leaders of your own party. You can huff and puff all you want, fake, dummy and illegal voters must and will be removed from Electoral rolls. All the time. Everytime.
In general course, I wud ignore your condemnation. But since you are CM of my state, I must take seriously your condemnation of me calling Rahul a fraud. So heres my response.
If you get Rahul to apologize for calling our PM @narendramodi a "deshdrohi" and have him apologize to Election Commission for lying, then I promise to stop referring to RahulGandhi as a fraud.
But if you dont take up my above offer but persist on using lies, unkept promises, corruption and appeasement as your political strategy, be prepared to be called out as frauds. Everytime.
#RahulGandhiExposed
Democracy is not a convenience.
Institutions cannot be trusted only when the verdict goes your way.
The Election Commission has now placed the facts on record: the SIR order of 24 June 2025 and the subsequent schedules had the unanimous approval of the full Commission.
That one clarification raises a very simple question: now that the official record has made the facts clear, will Rahul Gandhi and the Congress have the courage to admit that they misled the people?
Democracy is about respecting the people’s mandate, whether you win or lose.
Running a malicious campaign against institutions Indians trust is peak narcissism and an inflated sense of self-importance.
Congress owes this nation an honest, unconditional apology.
#RahulExposedByEC
विश्व के सर्वाधिक लोकप्रिय राजनेता आदरणीय प्रधानमंत्री श्री @narendramodi जी से आज नई दिल्ली में शिष्टाचार भेंट की।
आपका मार्गदर्शन 'नए उत्तर प्रदेश' के निर्माण हेतु मुझे सदैव नई ऊर्जा देता है।
अमूल्य समय प्रदान करने के लिए हार्दि�� आभार प्रधानमंत्री जी।
FIR must be registered against Ritika and Indian Express for making fake allegations on ECI .
FIR must be registered against Rahul Gandhi and CJP stooges for abusing Dalit Gyanesh Kumar .
The unanimous clarification issued by the Election Commission, led by Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, alongside Election Commissioners S. S. Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, reaffirms the integrity and credibility of our constitutional institutions and puts to rest all the misconceptions surrounding it.
The decisions concerning the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls are taken collectively and in strict adherence to established institutional protocols.
Attempts to undermine global confidence in India’s democratic framework or electoral processes for short-term political gains are deeply unfortunate.
Electoral outcomes reflect the people’s mandate. In a robust democracy, leadership also means accepting both victories and defeats with grace and humility.
Respect for our constitutional institutions is paramount. It is the collective responsibility of leaders across party lines to uphold public confidence in India’s democratic process.
@ECISVEEP
परवरिश @shantanug_ ? मैंने तो तेरे परिवार के बारे में कुछ कहा भी ��हीं. तेरी परवरिश ये है के अपना relevance बनाए रखने के लिए एक सरकार का चाटुकार बने रहना पड़ता है. खानदानी आदत है? क्यों? और तू ...इतना desperate है... के अपने LinkedIn की बात करने लगा? मैं क्या हूं... वो अपने sponsors से पूछ ले अधूरी कटोरी ( 👨🦲)! तेरा अस्तित्व सरकार की वजह से है...फिर भी zero impact. मेरा अस्तित्व तेरे sponsors के दमन के बावजूद है!
The BJP's obsession with Muslims is fascinating. Yogi Adityanath thinks Ghaznavi, who looted India between 1000 CE and 1027 CE is a relevant topic in 2026. He sounds like a broken record. We get it Yogi Adityanath, you hate Muslims. We really get it.
We are the world’s largest democracy, or so we like to believe. Women are protesting in the national capital for their safety after a brutal gang rape and the Prime Minister is indulging in ‘Bhajan clubbing’
Are we really doing this ???
🚨IMPORTANT NEWS🚨
Since Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar is in the news, I have some very important but sad news to share about a Supreme Court judge.
Supreme Court judge Justice Satish Chandra Sharma. Just two months away from retirement.
If you remember, the Allahabad High Court had imposed a penalty on Medha Roopam, the DM of Noida and daughter of Gyanesh Kumar with a fine of five lakh rupees for irrationally issuing NSA order against a student Activist for Noida labour protest.
That order was challenged before the Supreme Court of India. Live Law, the news portal, reported that Gyanesh’s daughter’s case was listed before Justice Satish Chandra Sharma out of turn and in violation of the Supreme Court roster and rules and convention. The challenge ought to have gone before Justice Nagarathna’s bench, known to be an independent upright judge.
Two days back, when the matter was listed for hearing, Justice Sharma‘s bench switched off the audio of the Supreme Court proceeding, which is highly unusual and almost never done. ALARMING. There was no explanation from the judge’s side as to why this extraordinary favour was done for Gyanesh’s daughter.
In any case the fine and the adverse remarks of the Allahabad High Court were stayed by Justice Sharma immediately.
Same day, in another case related to Gyanesh Kumar—the constitutional challenge that was filed against the 2023 law on election commissioners of India was finally decided by a two judge bench of which Justice Sharma was a part of.
Under challenge was the appointments procedure where the leader of opposition today holds only an ornamental seat in the Three-member selection committee that selects Election commissioner of India. The other two are PM and his Cabinet Minister. Justice Sharma dissented which led to a split verdict and the case has now been sent before the Chief Justice of India for constituting a larger bench. This has delayed the case by years probably. This split verdict itself came after three years. This is how the Supreme Court refuses to hear most important cases that affect our lives and the country.
A separate blanket immunity granted to past and present election commissioners of India by Modi’s government is also pending for last 9 months before CJI Surya Kant. Today, the Chief Election Commissioner has been exposed for gross illegalities and for stealing votes and elections at the behest of powers that be. Any sane, sorted, neutral, just person can see that the selection process of ECIs is not independent and tilted in govt’s favour. But not Justice Sharma.
And here’s the big news: his son holds not one, not two, but four big, plum government counsel panels, including income, tax department, GST, customs, and excise, and a Madhya Pradesh government lawyer panel. I need not explain the great perks and influence that come along when you hold such plum government panels. Read my Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma report where I exposed the same thing.
I am withholding the name of the son for now.
The important question is: how can a judge be expected to do impartial and fair Justice in politically sensitive cases if his family members serve at the pleasure of the government? The judge is also retiring two months later, and several lawyers have informed me that there are vacancies in NCLAT and other search plum tribunals.
I’M SORRY TO SAY such a system of judiciary does not inspire confidence in its ability to do impartial justice. There is a reason why the ethics code for judges require them to maintain a sense of aloofness and not do anything which can harm the their image and that of the judiciary.
Both in Justice Swarna Kanta’s case and several other judges case, including that of the Supreme Court, it is TRAGIC to notice the complete capture of the institution of the Indian judiciary. Can the judiciary go on like this?
योगी सरकार बनने के बाद सपा, बसपा के समय की पूरी गुंडागर्दी को भाजपा सरकार ने नेस्तनाबूद कर दिया है और इसी के कारण यहां पर बहुत अच्छा माहौल इंडस्ट्री लगाने के लिए देश और दुनिया के उद्यमियों के बीच में आया है: माननीय केंद्रीय गृह एवं सहकारिता मंत्री श्री @AmitShah जी