Mr Hellberg

Delivering aspects forgotten or not available for discussion. Content orientated, no juxtapositioning, not deliberately personal. Non-aligned. No ENDT. HRD.

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

Backdoor Censorship Portal: Social media platforms are being controlled by the regional national security units (local intelligence services). This is done by limiting the 'reach' of individual profiles; Grok calls this the 'visibility filtering for policy-violating content'.

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

@MarioBojic NPCs that is.

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

@mikko JEF-nations..?

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

@SecRubio @potus A strategy in which, instead of juxtaposing needlessly, you would support the ICC would win you the world. The reason calculations fail is because US relies on a decades-old losing globalist NPC strategy and not on a new view of Potus. Ask, and you will be given.A friend.

[𝐿𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑥 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑟 @linuxuser1996]

Countries where a YouTube video critizing EU's Chat Control has been banned.

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

@SRjudgeslawyers @DrAliceJEdwards @profbensaul @coe
Finland has a significant problem with systemic failure maintained by politicized legality supervision and the court system. The number of people being harassed under covert measures is significant.
https://t.co/bRbmXPo0zs

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

@SRjudgeslawyers @DrAliceJEdwards @profbensaul @coe
Finland has a significant problem with systemic failure maintained by politicized legality supervision and the court system. The number of people being harassed under covert measures is significant.
https://t.co/bRbmXPo0zs

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

Covert measured abused for secondary purposes, courts avoid accountability by permitting them.

[CIVIX RY @CIVIX_ry]

A gate that only opens is not a gate.

Across a growing number of cases, people bring national courts serious, medically-supported claims that a method is harming their life and health — measures that, on records spanning decades, are never brought to an end, preventing a normal life and leaving pain and injury in their wake.

The claims are not tested and rejected. No forum will examine them at all — each authority declines on competence grounds and routes the matter elsewhere, until a grave, documented claim comes to rest unexamined and unstopped.

That refusal is itself the violation — independent of whether any method is ever proven. An authority that declines to test an arguable claim, while the means to test it exist, has not shown the claim is unfounded. It has declined to look.

New CIVIX ry analytical note: "investigable, and not investigated" — the competence-decline problem, and why the authorizing court is where the safeguard breaks.
https://t.co/g2Y0ATMFhF

[CIVIX RY @CIVIX_ry]

A gate that only opens is not a gate.

Across a growing number of cases, people bring national courts serious, medically-supported claims that a method is harming their life and health — measures that, on records spanning decades, are never brought to an end, preventing a normal life and leaving pain and injury in their wake.

The claims are not tested and rejected. No forum will examine them at all — each authority declines on competence grounds and routes the matter elsewhere, until a grave, documented claim comes to rest unexamined and unstopped.

That refusal is itself the violation — independent of whether any method is ever proven. An authority that declines to test an arguable claim, while the means to test it exist, has not shown the claim is unfounded. It has declined to look.

New CIVIX ry analytical note: "investigable, and not investigated" — the competence-decline problem, and why the authorizing court is where the safeguard breaks.
https://t.co/g2Y0ATMFhF

[CIVIX RY @CIVIX_ry]

Under Article 3 ECHR, torture and inhuman treatment are prohibited absolutely — and the threshold turns on the severity of deliberately inflicted suffering, not on whether it leaves a scar. The Court has never required lasting injury as the price of protection.

So when a method induces incapacitating pain but no lesion standard imaging can capture, "no injury, therefore no violation" isn't a finding — it's a failure to apply the test.

An arguable claim of Article 3 treatment triggers a duty to investigate by ordinary medical means. Declining to investigate because no injury is presumed is itself the reviewable failure.

The methods are novel. The principle that meets them is not.

"Pain need not leave a mark to be torture" isn't an expansive reading — it's the ordinary one. The injury-requirement is the deviation.
https://t.co/xVyZpiv62r

[Going Underground @GUnderground_TV]

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on the farce of Western countries telling Congo to ‘just govern properly’:

‘The Kingdom of Belgium created a slave colony in Congo for 30 years. The government of Belgium ran the slave colony for another 40 years.

The CIA assassinated Congo’s first popular leader Patrice Lumumba, and then installed another dictatorship for the next 30 years.

And then Glencore and others now suck out your cobalt without giving Congo tax income. We don’t reflect on that. We say what’s wrong with you? Why don’t you govern properly?’

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

🇪🇺 Meanwhile at the European Parliament

Reptiles holding Boxes containing Humans means they want to show you exactly who they truly are.

[Inevitable West @Inevitablewest]

🚨BREAKING: The family of murdered French teen Louis has called a major protest in Narbonne on Sunday 5th July

His mother said: "Now is not the time for mourning, it is the time for war."

Thousands are expected to attend. 🇫🇷

[Rick Sanchez @RickSanchezTV]

The West says Putin rules without the support of his people.

Meanwhile, approval ratings:

▪️ Putin: ~80%
▪️ Trump: 37%
▪️ Merz: 18–20%
▪️ Macron: 18%
▪️ Von der Leyen: 23%
▪️ Starmer: 18%

The man they call a “dictator” is more popular than the leaders lecturing the world about democracy.

Tune in to Sanchez Effect.

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

@RepLuna @chaosmansonbook The cognitive warfare against populations is alive and well. https://t.co/dwhAXusnlj

[CIVIX RY @CIVIX_ry]

NATO has formally defined cognition as a warfare domain. Finland's national brain research infrastructure — 6 regional nodes, state-funded, defence-connected — is the documented implementation architecture. We are filing this with the ICC today. 🧵

The key deception: neurotechnology operations are classified by their delivery mechanism (non-invasive) rather than their biological effect (permanent neural modification, behaviour change, tissue ablation). This keeps them outside every accountability framework designed to prohibit them.

Finland's neuromodulation programme, Neuro-HIFU — focused ultrasound that ablates deep brain tissue with millimetre precision — deployed 2022. Classified: non-invasive. The IntuitiveBCI EU project (active through 2026) integrates BCI signals with automatic brain processes. Also: non-invasive.

University of Jyväskylä researches NATO cognitive warfare doctrine explicitly, funded by MATINE (Scientific Advisory Board for Defence). The CCSI group names 'neurosecurity' as a research pillar — protecting neural interfaces from intrusion affecting sensory perception and decision cycles. They know the threat is real.

The Finnish Defence Research Agency's own 2026 publication states cognitive warfare 'differs from information warfare' in that it 'influences deeper cognitive processes.' That is a Finnish state document. CIVIX ry's 14-year empirical research documents those deeper cognitive processes being targeted in Finnish civilians without consent.

Finland joined NATO in 2023. No democratic vote was held on deploying NATO's cognitive warfare doctrine against Finnish civilians. No parliamentary disclosure. No public consent. A constitutional democracy in which the executive deploys a military alliance's warfare doctrine against its own population without a mandate has ceased to function as one.

If the Finnish architecture is NATO cognitive warfare deployed domestically — and the public evidence says it is — the same architecture, adapted to national institutions, may be operating in other NATO member states. We have asked the ICC to assess the widespread and systematic threshold at the Alliance level. Filed today.

If the Finnish implementation architecture constitutes NATO cognitive warfare doctrine deployed domestically, the same architecture — adapted to national institutional structures — may be operating in other NATO member states.' — CIVIX ry ICC submission, 1 April 2026.
https://t.co/xZ6NnEqLAr

[BRITAIN IS BROKEN 🇬🇧 @BROKENBRITAIN0]

🚨BREAKING: Russia has just CLOSED the borders with Finland, Latvia, and Estonia 🇷🇺

The Russian government has given no prior warning and no explanation.

[Joe Rogan Podcast News @joeroganhq]

NATO Chief Rutte: "We need to be ready... Russia has brought war back to Europe, and we must be prepared for the scale of war our grandparents and great-grandparents endured."

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

@robinmonotti The same 'executive layer' runs the EU and NATO.
https://t.co/ZICaTIlec4

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

@ABridgen Our executive layer abuses strategic objectivity as a tool of the intelligence coup and enlist civilians to TSDB without court-level involvement. This means the entire 'war on terror' is an informal structure where targeted civilians have no remedies.
https://t.co/HFtuZxRc99

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

@ABridgen Our executive layer abuses strategic objectivity as a tool of the intelligence coup and enlist civilians to TSDB without court-level involvement. This means the entire 'war on terror' is an informal structure where targeted civilians have no remedies.
https://t.co/HFtuZxRc99

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

NATO is running two narratives: Russia (foreign policies to control structures) and terrorism (interior policies to control individuals). Relevant here: it is the politicians/analysts who list terrorists & call them criminals, not the court ie no judicial. https://t.co/9bT3Pfi9mu

[Mr Hellberg @mr_hellberg]

NATO is running two narratives: Russia (foreign policies to control structures) and terrorism (interior policies to control individuals). Relevant here: it is the politicians/analysts who list terrorists & call them criminals, not the court ie no judicial. https://t.co/9bT3Pfi9mu

[CIVIX RY @CIVIX_ry]

CIVIX ry publishes the PART IV doctrinal analysis of a configuration in which Convention States operate security-state deterrence operations against categorised civilians on their own territory.

Central finding: States participating in counter-terrorism run their operations as informal architecture without judicial status. The operational consequence is that the rights and freedoms of categorised individuals are not required to be considered. The architecture is institutionally designed for this.

Attached is the latest and rewritten version of PART IV (v3) — DETERRENCE UNDER INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW WHEN THE SECURITY-STATE DETERRENCE DOCTRINE OPERATES AGAINST CIVILIANS
https://t.co/4vK4vu0zvr