Since 2014, we’ve used this account to share #OpenResearch
However, in recent years - like many others - we’ve experienced a huge drop in engagement due to developments on the platform.
He seems wedded to things he doesn't understand, whilst committed to gargling the deeply unclear language that he claims to oppose (Rule 10: “Be Precise in Your Speech”).
I wrote about his profound misunderstanding of evolutionary theory here:
Excellent in person Research Culture event earlier launching our Open Research Champions Network & Open Research Hub.
Great talks by @NickPlantLeeds @mrnick, Claire Knowles, @DrEmilyG, @emrinke & @cat_davies#openresearch
As we all await the outcome of what feels like a make-or-break election, I want to offer some perspective, if you’ll hand a fellow with eight-plus decades the mic for a moment.
"Open access improves the dissemination of science: Insights from @Wikipedia"
Key result: Wikipedia increasingly relies on OA articles. Relatedly, OA articles have a higher likelihood of being cited in Wikipedia. The effect is particularly strong for highly cited or newly published articles.
@cervisiarius@WikiResearch #OA #OpenAccess #OpenScience
https://t.co/K2RRL33hmA
Ok, here we go: Much of my work concerns the history and return of scientific racism. I’ve written extensively about attempts to resurrect the shuffling corpse of
race science and eugenics for many years. Bigotry dressed up as biology. 1/n
I’ll only accept “person dead” (wouldn’t matter* if they’d archived in a repository)
*well, it’s sad they’re dead. Obviously. But at least they’d live on through their DOIs