Manolo de la Serna

@mserna

Telecommunications engineerd working in Southern California. Free Markets and Personal Freedom. #TaxationIsTheft #SocialismKills

Newport Beach, CA

Joined June 2008

360 Following

199 Followers

1.9K Posts

Pinned Tweet

Manolo de la Serna

@mserna

about 8 years ago · Beijing

Los dos bandos fueron terribles, y no podemos olvidarnos y dejar que solo se criminalize a los de un lado. Recordemos a los caídos por la basura totalitaria. https://t.co/rRWNzkgKRO

Manolo de la Serna

@mserna

3 days ago

@cu30rry_ @Kevin_Logan @bot @bot are you there?

Manolo de la Serna

@mserna

4 days ago

@cu30rry_ @Kevin_Logan @bot any of this useful for me?

101

Manolo de la Serna

@mserna

7 days ago

@DigitalDaisyX @bot @bot review this and provide summary

Who to follow

Pablo Moreno

@pmorenocap

Economy. Private Equity. Bitcoin.

Borja

@borjaserra

https://t.co/qa5IvyxGXb

7 days ago

@TwinVentures @congressdj @elonmusk @bot @bot do the same for me

215

mserna retweeted

Pablo Haro Urquízar

@pabloharour

13 days ago

FELIZ DÍA DE LOS COJONAZOS GIGANTES

472

181

109K

Manolo de la Serna

@mserna

14 days ago

@SamanthaBallent @NunezFeijoo Una que quiere seguir viviendo del cuento y que los que si nos sacrificamos le sigamos pagando la fiesta. Dobla el lomo, floja!

447

Manolo de la Serna

@mserna

21 days ago

@kolpe_kolpez @Dimebag15278768 @aldonarejos Jajaja vete a Sol a dar la turra a los que les interese tu matraca. Aquí de momento has puesto 2 tuits y no has dicho nada. Agur!

mserna retweeted

𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗠𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗲𝘀

@Old_But_Gold50s

24 days ago

Vivaldi's “Winter,” visualized in a fascinating way, so that the auditory experience is even more intense; one can literally “see” the music, so to speak

515

54K

11K

23K

Manolo de la Serna

@mserna

about 1 month ago

@LoCyber Ojalá no ser el clon de Mortadelo, ojalá no peinarse con una toalla, ojalá no ser un cabeza de rodilla, ojalá no ser un tobogán de piojos… Tienes cosas mucha más importantes que desear, pelón, calvo, careca fdp!

141

mserna retweeted

Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱

@Kristof_Poland

about 2 months ago

Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century. Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions. Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935. 1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first. 2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another. 3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own. 4. He also theorized the organic intellectual – the person who translates the theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate through the culture without appearing ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gramsci understood that culture is politics by other means – and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections. 5. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a published, documented, widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed. The march took fifty years. It worked. 6. Mussolini’s prosecutor said at his trial: "We must stop this brain from functioning for twenty years." The brain did not stop. It produced thirty-three notebooks – smuggled out, published, and became the most widely read Marxist text in the Western academy after Marx himself. Gramsci died in 1937, six days after his release, at forty-six. He did not see the march he theorized. He did not need to. 7. Every captured institution, every transformed curriculum, every HR department enforcing approved speech, every content moderation policy suppressing the unauthorized voice – all running the program Antonio Gramsci designed in a prison cell, by a brain that was supposed to have been stopped. It wasn’t. And neither was the march. Until now – because the distribution monopoly that made its outcomes enforceable is cracking. The counter-march has begun. It just doesn’t have a name yet.

Kristof_Poland's tweet photo. Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century.

Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions.
Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935.

1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first.

2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another.

3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own.

4. He also theorized the organic intellectual – the person who translates the theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate through the culture without appearing ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gramsci understood that culture is politics by other means – and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections.

5. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a published, documented, widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed. The march took fifty years. It worked.

6. Mussolini’s prosecutor said at his trial: "We must stop this brain from functioning for twenty years." The brain did not stop. It produced thirty-three notebooks – smuggled out, published, and became the most widely read Marxist text in the Western academy after Marx himself. Gramsci died in 1937, six days after his release, at forty-six. He did not see the march he theorized. He did not need to.

7. Every captured institution, every transformed curriculum, every HR department enforcing approved speech, every content moderation policy suppressing the unauthorized voice – all running the program Antonio Gramsci designed in a prison cell, by a brain that was supposed to have been stopped. It wasn’t. And neither was the march.
Until now – because the distribution monopoly that made its outcomes enforceable is cracking. The counter-march has begun. It just doesn’t have a name yet.

21K

19K

12M

Manolo de la Serna

@mserna

4 months ago

@hispanarquia @velardedaoiz2 @kalakahua 🎯

mserna retweeted

David Alandete

@alandete

5 months ago

Imagine if FBI agents entered Democratic Party headquarters while the President’s wife, brother, closest aides, mentor, party bosses and former top prosecutor were all under simultaneous investigation. That is Spain right now. Pedro Sánchez built his global brand as Europe’s “anti-Trump,” the progressive left’s moral alternative to populism, the darling of the New Yorker and the New York Times. Now his Socialist Party is under criminal investigation, police have entered party headquarters, and the scandal is reaching the Prime Minister’s own inner circle. https://t.co/TL2gI7lxic

434

19K

408

258K

Manolo de la Serna

@mserna

6 months ago

“AOC isn't defending workers. She's defending a parasitic political class that thrives on resentment and needs the poor to stay poor to keep its electorate.” Another masterpiece by monsieur Le Pogam!

Brivael Le Pogam

@brivael

6 months ago

AOC vient d’expliquer aux Américains que les milliardaires sont des voleurs. Le problème, c’est que les voleurs dont elle parle ont sorti 6 milliards d’humains de la misère pendant qu’elle apprenait à parler dans un micro. Reprenons ce qui devrait être une évidence : qui a réellement sorti l’humanité de la pauvreté ? Ce n’est pas une question rhétorique. C’est une question historique avec des réponses précises. En 1820, 90% de l’humanité vivait dans l’extrême pauvreté. Aujourd’hui, moins de 9%. C’est la révolution la plus massive de l’histoire humaine. Qui l’a faite ? Pas les bureaucrates. Pas les députés. Pas les commissaires politiques. Les entrepreneurs. Citons-les. Nommons-les. Parce qu’on a oublié à quel point on leur doit tout. James Watt. Sa machine à vapeur démultipliée par Boulton transforme l’énergie disponible par humain d’un facteur 100. Sortie de la misère agricole pour des centaines de millions de gens. Cornelius Vanderbilt. Réseaux ferroviaires qui transforment les États-Unis d’un archipel de fermes en économie continentale. Prix du transport divisé par 20 en 30 ans. John D. Rockefeller. Avant lui, le kérosène coûtait l’équivalent de 3 jours de salaire pour s’éclairer une semaine. Après lui, quelques cents. Standard Oil a sorti des dizaines de millions de foyers de l’obscurité littérale. Andrew Carnegie. Acier passé de 170$ à 17$ la tonne. Sans cette baisse, pas de gratte-ciels, pas de ponts, pas d’infrastructure moderne. Tout ce qu’AOC tient pour acquis dans New York existe grâce à un “robber baron”. Henry Ford. Production de masse de l’automobile. Une Model T en 1908 valait 825$. En 1925, 260$. La mobilité, jusque-là privilège aristocratique, devient bien commun. Ses ouvriers gagnent 5$ par jour quand le marché paie 2,34$. Norman Borlaug. Pas un milliardaire, mais un entrepreneur agronome. Sa révolution verte a sauvé environ 1 milliard de vies par augmentation des rendements. Un milliard. Plus que tous les programmes étatiques de l’histoire combinés. Sam Walton. Walmart a baissé le coût de la vie pour les ménages américains modestes d’environ 2300$ par an et par foyer. Pour les pauvres, c’est 25% de pouvoir d’achat en plus. AOC voudrait fermer Walmart au nom des pauvres. Bill Gates. Microsoft a transformé l’ordinateur d’outil de spécialiste en infrastructure universelle. Productivité mondiale démultipliée. Et il consacre maintenant sa fortune à éradiquer la malaria, qui tue 600K personnes par an, principalement des enfants africains. Steve Jobs. Apple a redéfini l’interface entre l’humain et la machine. Smartphone dans la poche de 4 milliards d’humains, dont l’agriculteur kenyan qui peut maintenant accéder aux prix de marché et au mobile banking. Jeff Bezos. Amazon a baissé les prix de la consommation pour des centaines de millions de foyers, donné une logistique mondiale aux PME, et permis le passage de l’économie physique à digitale qui a soutenu l’économie pendant le Covid. Elon Musk. Tesla force toute l’industrie à passer à l’électrique 20 ans plus vite que prévu. SpaceX divise par 10 le coût d’accès orbital. Starlink connecte les zones que les États ont été incapables de connecter en 50 ans. Jensen Huang. NVIDIA fournit l’infrastructure de calcul qui rend possible la révolution IA actuelle. Sans lui, pas de ChatGPT. Sans lui, pas la prochaine décennie de productivité mondiale. Maintenant, jouons au jeu inverse. Citez-moi un seul bureaucrate, un seul député, un seul commissaire politique qui ait sorti des centaines de millions de personnes de la pauvreté. Je vous attends. Mao : 45 millions de morts dans le Grand Bond en avant. Staline : 6 à 9 millions de morts dans l’Holodomor et les famines de collectivisation. Maduro : 90% de pauvreté au Venezuela, sur le pays qui détient les premières réserves mondiales de pétrole. Castro : île qui exportait du sucre et du tabac transformée en ruine économique. Le pattern est invariant. Quand des gens qui n’ont jamais créé de valeur décident de “redistribuer” celle des autres, le résultat est la destruction de la valeur elle-même. Toujours. AOC parle de “wage theft de 50 milliards par an”. Ce chiffre vient de l’EPI, un think tank syndical, et inclut largement des erreurs administratives sur les heures supplémentaires. Mais admettons-le tel quel. 50 milliards sur une masse salariale américaine de 11 trillions, soit 0,45%. Pendant ce temps, Elon Musk seul a créé environ 1 trillion de valeur de marché en 20 ans. Bezos environ 2 trillions cumulés. Gates 3 trillions. Jensen Huang 4 trillions sur la dernière décennie. L’asymétrie est vertigineuse. Et AOC veut nous faire croire que le problème, c’est les créateurs de valeur, pas leur absence. Sa thèse implicite : les pauvres sont pauvres parce que les riches sont riches. C’est faux historiquement, mathématiquement, et empiriquement. Les pays qui ont le plus de milliardaires par habitant (USA, Suisse, Israël, Suède) sont aussi ceux où les pauvres vivent le mieux. Les pays sans milliardaires (Cuba, Venezuela, Corée du Nord) sont ceux où les pauvres meurent littéralement de faim. La vraie question n’est jamais “comment empêcher les milliardaires d’exister”, c’est “comment en créer plus”. Parce que chaque grand entrepreneur qui réussit, c’est des millions de vies améliorées par effet de levier. Si on veut moins de misère, il faut plus d’entrepreneurs, pas plus d’AOC. Plus de gens qui prennent des risques, créent des entreprises, embauchent, innovent, échouent, recommencent. Moins de gens qui n’ont jamais rien construit mais qui veulent légiférer sur ce que les autres ont le droit de posséder. La compassion sincère pour les pauvres, ce n’est pas la rage redistributive. C’est la création des conditions pour qu’apparaissent les Ford, les Watt, les Borlaug, les Musk de la prochaine génération. AOC ne défend pas les travailleurs. Elle défend une classe politique parasitaire qui prospère sur le ressentiment et a besoin que les pauvres restent pauvres pour conserver son électorat. Le vrai vol, ce n’est pas le “wage theft”. C’est la captation par la classe politique de la richesse créée par les entrepreneurs, pour la redistribuer selon des critères clientélistes plutôt que productifs. Chaque dollar pris à un Musk pour être donné à la machine étatique américaine, c’est un dollar qui aurait pu accélérer la transition énergétique, l’accès orbital, ou l’IA. Et qui devient à la place un dollar de salaires de fonctionnaires fédéraux. Le choix civilisationnel est simple. Soit on fait confiance aux gens qui ont prouvé qu’ils savent créer de la valeur. Soit on fait confiance à ceux qui ont prouvé qu’ils savent en parler. Je sais lesquels ont sorti l’humanité de la misère. Et ce n’est pas ceux qui tiennent un micro de podcast en accusant les autres.

337

297

75K