@afanelli93 @Deenosaurr15 There's a relatively new material called graphene, that may revolutionize the way we make batteries. Hopefully development on the material will come fast enough to limit our need for rare earth minerals
@ccarl012@NatGeo It's hard to say. Scientists also say that they have limited information on polar bears due to the remote areas that they live. I have read that grizzlies have begun interreeding with polar bears due to global warming
@afanelli93 I prefer nuclear to coal honesty. Nuclear waste is problematic, but we have the abilitiy to store it. Our planet however does not have th eability to fend off much more CO2 in the atmosphere
@ajacquin_273@globeandmail there's a clear connection between fracking and earthquackes, need look no further than texas in the US. They are practically the pioneers of fracking, and areas with no history of earthquackes are experiencing 500% more than norm
@Jordan_273 what's also depressing is that scientists theorize that there are likely many species that are going extinct that we havent even idnetified yet.
@kathrynphys273@CNNAfrica I read that they were able to conserve it's semen, they might be able to artificially inceminate some of the left over females. IT's a long shot though.
@amanda_melaram @melgendreau people complain that they do damage do avian birds. what these people dont understand is that there cats do way more damage to bird populations than windmills
@ajacquin_273 To be fair it's hard to tell how polar bears are doing overall. They live in some of the most remote locations on the planet. This could have been an outlier. I am reading conflicting information about this subject.
@TA_Andrew_P273@TaqiHaque @han_boyi They do effffect birds a little bit, however I read a study that said that cats are way worse to birds than wind turbines will ever be