@rishibagree After the Hon’ble President of India rejected her claim to become Prime Minister due to her foreign origin, she was completely shocked and worried. She also feared that if she chose Rahul as the Prime Minister, his alleged dual citizenship might be exposed.
Export duty is a tax imposed by a government on goods that are exported to other countries. When the duty is reduced:
Exporting these fuels becomes more profitable for oil companies and refineries.
Indian refiners may increase exports because the tax burden is lower.
The government's revenue from these export taxes decreases.
Global buyers may find Indian fuel exports more competitive.
@FalconUpdatesHQ Scientifically, paper currency carries bacteria, fungi, oils, sweat, and contaminants because it constantly changes hands. In practical terms, money is treated as a utility object, not a sacred object.
A stricter public order system can produce visible short-term gains: cleaner civic behavior, better compliance with rules, reduced petty disorder, smoother public services, and greater predictability in daily life. Countries that enforce rules consistently often appear more efficient because people internalize consequences. Traffic flows better, public spaces stay cleaner, corruption at low levels may reduce and institutions look more credible.
@Beno10_MFC D is the different one.
In A, B, and C:
the mixer arm and bowl alignment are the same,the bowl sits slightly more to the left under the whisk.
In D:
the bowl is shifted slightly to the right, the whisk appears more centered differently relative to the bowl and stand.
This time Assam witnessed a record breaking pooling percentage -85.80%
In 2016, it was 84.72% which resulted the defeat of Tarun Gogoi lead Congress government !
You assumed: “No sugar = harmful → must start sugar immediately” That’s not evidence-based. The body does not require added sugar (sucrose) at all. Children get glucose from:
Rice, roti, fruits, milk
All carbohydrates → converted into glucose
So, No added sugar ≠ deficiency
No sugar does NOT stunt growth by itself
The pediatrician’s advice is usually meant to prevent:
Early junk food habits
Sugar addiction
Childhood obesity
Dental caries
Future metabolic issues (especially relevant in India)
Given your own note (growth concern), here’s the key: The issue is almost never lack of sugar, it's usually overall calorie or protein intake
Instead of reacting emotionally, you should have asked:
Total daily calorie intake?
Protein intake (milk, eggs, dal)?
Feeding frequency?
Appetite?
Growth chart percentile?
Because a child can eat zero sugar and still grow perfectly OR eat lots of sugar and still be malnourished
The pediatrician’s advice is standard, evidence-based
Not giving sugar to a 3-year-old is completely acceptable
Sugar is optional, not essential
Growth issues should be evaluated through nutrition, not sugar intake.
@DrakeGlider@dhruvesh_naik The fair comparison used by energy researchers is kitchen efficiency:
Cooking method Efficiency to pot
Gas stove ~40–45%
Induction ~85–90%
So induction still transfers about twice as much energy to the food.
A doctor securing Rank 1 in the UPSC examination is an inspiring achievement. It shows that professionals from diverse fields can contribute to public service and governance.
Medical training develops discipline, analytical thinking, and a deep understanding of public health challenges - qualities that can be valuable in administration.
About the claim that “India has lost control of its maritime region”
That statement is political rhetoric, not a factual assessment.
Key facts:Countries do not control international waters outside their territorial sea (12 nautical miles).
The attack location was well outside India’s jurisdiction.
This is likely oversimplified and possibly misleading.
Under the SARFAESI Act, banks can seize and auction secured assets without court intervention if the loan becomes an NPA.
A loan is classified as NPA only after 90 days of non-payment, not immediately after 3 missed EMIs.
After NPA classification, the bank must issue a 60-day demand notice (Section 13(2)) before taking possession and auctioning.
The borrower still has the right to clear dues anytime before the auction sale is finalized (right of redemption).
So the claim “lost flat after just 3 missed EMIs” is incomplete difficult to believe.
Under the leadership of Narendra Modi, India must ensure that taxpayer-funded aid is tied to measurable guarantees of minority safety, human rights protections, and accountability. Strategic partnerships cannot be unconditional when core civilizational and humanitarian values are repeatedly undermined.
Lowering NEET PG cutoffs to 103 and even −40 is not reform, it is institutionalised dilution.
If 18,000 seats are still vacant, the problem is NOT merit , it is exploitative private college fees running from ₹25 lakh to ₹1 crore+.
Blaming students by crashing cutoffs is intellectual dishonesty. This is a bailout of private medical colleges, paid for by future patients’ safety. Postgraduate medical training is not a charity scheme and not a real-estate inventory problem.
Lowering standards to fill overpriced seats will only produce undertrained specialists, worsen public trust, and damage Indian medicine long-term.
Fix fees. Regulate private colleges.
Do NOT destroy merit to cover policy failure.
The Rafale comparison is fake.
• UPA never bought Rafales , no contract was signed. ₹570 cr was an early estimate, not a deal.
• Modi govt bought 36 Rafales, not 114.
• Total cost ≈ ₹58,000 cr, not ₹3.25 lakh cr.
• Higher cost includes weapons, spares, training, India-specific upgrades.
• Tech transfer claims are misleading , core tech was never on offer, even under UPA.
• HAL was excluded due to delivery and liability issues, not corruption.
Comparing a failed tender with a signed contract using fake numbers is propaganda, not accountability.
UPA’s trade policy wasn’t liberalization, it was strategic incompetence. They signed FTAs that opened Indian markets without securing reciprocal access, ignored rules of origin, let China backdoor through partners, and crippled domestic manufacturing. Massive trade deficits weren’t accidents they were the predictable outcome of weak negotiation and zero accountability.
In contrast, the current leadership negotiates from strength, not submission. Strategic sectors are protected, export access is prioritized, and FTAs are structured to reduce risk, not import it. That shift reflects clear vision, hard bargaining, and an understanding of national interest that something painfully missing during the UPA years.
The judgment is correct and necessary. When material on record shows planning, coordinated violence, and deliberate disruption of essential services, this is no longer dissent but a threat to public order and national security.
The Supreme Court of India rightly held that such acts fall outside the protection of free expression. Bail cannot be granted where actions prima facie point to conspiracy, economic disruption, and attempts to destabilize governance. Rule of law must prevail over ideological excuses.