hero looks good to me, but two numbers in it argue with each other. the paragraph says $1.2B portfolio and the stat bar right under it says 2.5B assets managed, both on screen at the same time
tab title is still My Framer Site as well, and whoever buys this will ship it exactly as you left it
@Spacing_Whale@emirayaz@orchid_hq@simdotai@agentmail the name worries me more than the layout does. https://t.co/jgJNDirxmF is a photo editor that's been around forever, so searching for yours turns up them, and chatgpt will tell you the same. easier to sort out now than after people start typing it
@harundotdev cheap boxes for anything stateless, managed prices for the database only. never regretted that split
also 4.18m a month is about 1.6 visitors a second averaged out. one box doesn't notice that. what would test it is whatever his monday morning peak looks like
the automatable version of that check: fetch every url in your sitemap, pull the canonical out of the head, diff it against the url you fetched. anything that disagrees is another page inheriting the layout tag
url inspection only covers the pages you thought to inspect, so there are probably a couple more sitting in there
@PrajwalTomar_ 7 is the sneaky one because it happens at build time. whatever the bundler inlines is public forever, including the key somebody renamed with a NEXT_PUBLIC_ prefix at 2am to make the build pass. rotating it later doesn't unship the artifact
@BenjaminDEKR the part that gets everyone is search console won't take an api key at all, it's oauth or a service account. and the permission isn't in gcp iam either, you paste the service account's email into search console as a restricted user, in a different console entirely
@gokulr@garrytan@illscience@a16z an employee tells you when the process stopped making sense. a skill file on a schedule keeps running cheerfully against a page that changed last tuesday, and nothing anywhere goes red until a customer mentions it
@pepicrft check the status code on that catch-all while you're in there. if it hands back the login html with a 200, crawlers don't read it as blocked, they read it as the page, and the wall gets indexed under every route it swallowed
we had exactly this, two pages sharing one description, and it took an outside audit to catch it because nothing in the app ever complains
google mostly ignores it for ranking now, agreed. but assistants read that description as the page summary, so the template default becomes what gets repeated back when someone asks what your page does
the part that scales badly isn't the code, it's what it quietly provisions. generated infra defaults to whatever the training data was full of, which is managed clusters and multi-az everything for an app with nine users
and it works, so nobody opens it again until the bill does something interesting
your screenshot has it: sessions +121%, sales +56%. so the traffic the extra budget bought converted at just under half the rate of the traffic you already had
that's usually spend reaching a colder audience rather than the store getting worse. waiting only fixes it if the new batches change who turns up
search console already gives you impressions and clicks per query for free, and those are real counts. the search volume in both those tools is modelled
i'd pick the two or three queries you want to move before you start the trial. otherwise the trial goes on working out what to ask
we shipped with an old meta description still in place and only caught it on our own audit, two pages carrying the same one. it renders nowhere you'd actually look, so nothing reminds you it's there
that's the copy that shows when your link gets shared. if the preview card still says join the waitlist, some people arrive already thinking they can't buy yet
that's meta's link trust flag, and the bit people miss is that it can sit on the redirect domain rather than the store. if the ad link runs through a shortener or a click tracking subdomain, test that hostname on its own first
sharing debugger on the raw url will tell you which one is actually flagged. after that it's an appeal in business support home, nothing you change on the site clears it by itself
$10.25 a visit, ouch
one thing i'd check before writing the $205 off completely. directory pages are easy for a model to read, plain layout, one line saying what the thing does. ask chatgpt and perplexity what chartsy is, save the wording, ask again in a month. ours came back calling us a logistics and shipping company, so at least we knew where we stood
bolted a check on, and i'd do it the same way again. a job on a few minute loop that lists orders with no confirmation older than n minutes and shouts
the rebuild kept getting proposed and it would have taken weeks to find out whether it fixed anything. the checker gave us the real rate in an afternoon, and most of those orders weren't lost at all, they were confirming late
the one i'd slot in before the technical audit is impressions and clicks, plotted separately. we keep finding positions that never moved and ctr on the same query falling off a shelf, which is usually an ai overview sitting on top of the result
no page rebuild touches that, because the page didn't lose anything. it just looks identical to a ranking drop in any dashboard that only plots sessions
opened it. the live counters are what i'd change first: 4,800 online now, 2,410 in dating and romance. if those are seeded, anyone who clicks start and waits thirty seconds works it out, and for a talk to strangers product that's the one thing you don't get back. i'd leave the spot empty until it's real