Nicholas Drake

Professional student. Mediocre lifter of moderately heavy objects. Technically certified in some things. Most thoughts are mine

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@SeanFennessey @TheBigPic

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@SinBinVegas @Palla003 Get em Ken

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@RepDavids Why can’t the state of Kansas support those efforts if it’s going to receive money directly from the federal government?

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@SinBinVegas For 435? No wonder league revenues are skyrocketing

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@JackKennedy West world

[Olathe Police @OlathePolice]

SPECIAL ORDER: Olathe Police Chief Mike Butaud approves Kansas City Chiefs hats, effective immediately through February 9th. Go Chiefs! #3peat #SuperBowl #ChiefsKingdom @CityofOlatheKS

[The Lord of Leisure @LeisureGod69]

69 retweets and I’ll read this and report back on what really happened

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@bomani_jones Couple of haters with the 4* ratings

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@PharmDabbler Im still fairly new to the stock market, shouldn’t encouraging data increase price?

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@SunsetStation_ Damn it. I was just here for my bachelor party.

[SinBin.vegas @SinBinVegas]

1 year ago today

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@SinBinVegas Would be a pretty good lineup for next year assuming no Stephenson

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@SinBinVegas Really like to see Cotter-Bill-Stone on a line with each other.

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@MikeMcKenna56 great crystal ball gazing for the Ducks pick from yesterday! Love hearing you on the radio, miss the goalie interference run

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@SinBinVegas +600 to score a goal on barstool…hammered it.

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@SinBinVegas That’s incredible

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@SinBinVegas @James_Buckle04 It is….but the internet hasn’t provided the goods yet.

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@MikeMcKenna56 That’s horrible.

[Nicholas Drake @nbdrake]

@SinBinVegas Never

[Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, PhD @TracyBethHoeg]

Just published in @JME_BMJ our group's reply to Dr. Lam & Nichols' published Response to our article "COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: A risk-benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities"

tl;dr (or cr) version (since not open access)

"In conclusion, we have given a fair representation of the expected harms of the booster dose for young people and provided a conservative overestimate of the benefits of the booster dose against severe COVID-19 in this age group. Thus far vaccination has not been shown to prevent future severe disease in those with infection-derived immunity and this is currently estimated to be over 93% of first-year college-aged people in the USA.

The benefits of the booster in this age group, even to those not previously infected, have not been demonstrated using randomised data.... For these reasons, and because we did not subtract out incidental hospitalisations, we have constructed this analysis conservatively in assuming the upper limit of possible benefits from the booster dose in this age group.

Even in doing so, we have found net harms outweigh net benefits in this 18–29-year-old age group."

w/@KrugAlli @KevinBardosh @sdbaral @ID_ethics @s_keshavjee @TrudoLemmens @VPrasadMDMPH & @MartyMakary
Great team!

https://t.co/9oWkqLsmZX