Nick Drachman

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

Very excited to see the central work of my Phd finally published in @NatureComms

https://t.co/329pUk5W8D

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@slavov_n @Nature This is really stunning work Nikolai! Congratulations to you and your team

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@bitcloud Thats not how this works at all. MRI measures the magnetic properties of tissue, there is no reason to assume that an ultrasound will contain the same information

Its like thinking you can use AI + a scale to tell the difference between a red ball and a blue ball of equal weight

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@ChrisPainterYup Its just the math of running huge numbers of scans on asymptomatic people. If the odds of an asymptomatic person having some specific tumor are 1/10000, and the scan produces a false positive rate of 1%, then 100 ppl get a cancer diagnosis for every 1 that actually has cancer

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@altryne @midjourney "It can image internal tissues finer than the width of an atom."

If you believe this then no one should take seriously anything you say about a technical topic ever again.

The picometers refer to the movement of the piezo transducers, not the resolution of internal tissues

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@Clarksterh @IterIntellectus They are obfuscating the difference between imaging resolution and the subatomic movements in the piezoelectric transducers that are detectable. That makes it sound impressive but isnt novel at all

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@ChrissGPT @praj_jwol lol not even close

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@AWar1586398 @nickmmark Lol, it was invented within the "sacred priesthood", these guys are just commercializing it and made a flashy video about it.
https://t.co/jbrl2s3oVK

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@vortogen @midjourney This does not scan to the subatomic level. The femtometer scale they're talking about is just the amount of movement in the piezoelectric transducers that is detectable, not the resolution of the images

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@maxfielddagoat @WildWhy_v3_44 or you could go to Great Circles which is a record store in philly that actually sells just electronic and experimental music

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@DellAnnaLuca @pythagoreanmetr If I recall from my undergraduate experience, the "drop out rate" for pre-med students was around 50%. They didn't actually drop-out of college altogether, they just switched majors or decided not to apply to med school

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@segyges Common usage among math/physics/CS folks that comes from vector calculus. If the interaction between two vector quantities is defined by a dot product, and the vectors are orthogonal, their dot product equals 0, so they are independent or "unrelated"

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@RamonPang About a month ago discogs changed the search logic for multiple styles from AND to OR, making this kind of digging impossible. Thankfully enough people complained that they switched it back

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@LauraDeming Momentum dissipates too quickly at the microscale in biological systems for anything to be "thrown"

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@NBABabySecret Watch his debate with William F Buckley, absolutely wipes the floor with him

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@francoisfleuret We would have never arrived at anything like machine learning, or any modern technology, without those 20 centuries of philosophy

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@himbo_urbanist Providence

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@martinmbauer Someone was browsing r/physics...

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@marinasmigielsk You don't think that happened in the past? No one in the 80s was making Ragtime music

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@YourFiendTina Model/Actriz is the band you're looking for

https://t.co/AJN1EUThAz

[Nick Drachman @ndrach1]

@sight__unseen the fakie double flip fakie manny made me a believer