Ironically, classic ideas of cyborgs - Ghost in the shell style with biological brains controlling artificial bodies got it entirely the wrong way around. We are not the ghost but the shell. Artificial brains already do and will continue to expand control on biological bodies
@DisgracedProp this entire tweet is just putting the cart before the horse. the industrial revolution enabled britain to dominate the globe, fixation on manners/services came as a wasteful byproduct and is exactly what drives the UK’s decline. supply drives demand, what?
@jess_ann_pin@IterIntellectus@grok jess says the study is justified in saying “Testosterone eliminated the audience effect in prosocial reward-maximizing choices.” wouldn’t the effects she denies necessarily follow from eliminating audience effects, e.g. decreased submission to audience expectations?
@SergiSanz05@NickClairmont1 imo “cooked” feels much more like a rediscovery/re-popularization because its meaning is so intuitive. unlike other invented terms like “mogging”. analogy would be more like an ancient forgotten tool, in which case you would say the origin of the tool was in fact ancient
@iamtrask@Vijay2050977 i don’t understand this take. you’re conflating valuable specialised context (hedge fund would provide this themselves, they already pay millions for specialised apis) and the actual unit of computation (from ai companies). the computation behaves exactly like a utility
@AustinTLynch@kaimicahmills a good analogy would be to patients under general anesthesia. nociceptors fire and a brain is present. but patients have no conscious experience of pain. would that not be enough? a brainless body still has damage response
@JammerPalmer@kaimicahmills trying to understand on what dimensions you think this is good. if we had a drug that would render brained pigs into a state of bliss, would that be better than removing the brain?