#GenAI is all the rage! And the FOMO is real!!! But security always lags the enthusiasm of new tech.
Read my article on the latest security finding on LLM & vector databases, and how you can address the concerns.
https://t.co/uVy8emQuUx
#LLM@milvusio@trychroma@pinecone
The US releases its July #inflation /#CPI data tomorrow (August 10th), which will impact interest rates. Read how a little #Analytics on the previous data shows what is likely to be the message delivered… and why it should be taken with a grain of salt!
https://t.co/VhSvJUJGPF
First @twitter, and now @Reddit . One side effect of the generative #LLM hype (like #ChatGPT & #Bard) is the death of open APIs and 3rd-party apps, as social media sites look to monetize their “golden goose” in the spirit of “data is the new oil”.
https://t.co/otHbzi6z1T
@Andy_Ball_819 @acoyne No I get it - (I should have added a “vs. Hybrid”). My point is there is the question of what’s fair/right in our current Westminster system, and there’s the separate (and equally valid) question of if/how to change to a different system with a PR element.
@Andy_Ball_819 @acoyne Separate question: People will argue PR vs. regional seat representation (with arguments to be made on both sides). Good debate to have.
But in our current Westminster system, having ridings selected FPTP doesn’t represent the will of those ridings.
@rollie1356 @beehugger29 @IshatReza I think we’ve run out of new ground to cover here, I graciously bow out of this thread. Thanks for the discussion! 🙂
@rollie1356 @beehugger29 @IshatReza 3rd point: vehemently disagree! Artificial spilling of a segment is undemocratic. Doing runoffs (just like they do in the PC leadership vote) is democracy in irs fullest
@rollie1356 @beehugger29 @IshatReza 2nd point - that’s a feature, not a drawback! Just because one segment is over-represented by candidates, doesn’t disqualify it’s voters in segment. The logistic of the reform party forming didn’t reflect a surge in liberal support, just an artificial splitting of the right
@howardcole@acoyne Ranked ballot ISN’T PR. Separate question: People will argue PR vs. regional seat representation (with arguments to be made on both sides). Good debate to have.
But in our current Westminster system, having ridings selected FPTP doesn’t represent the will of those ridings.
@rollie1356 @beehugger29 @IshatReza Like what? A fringe party is not going to get any seats in a ranked ballot system. It literally just allows a voter to say how she wants her vote counted (even if her preferred choice doesnt win) in her riding.
@rollie1356 @beehugger29 @IshatReza Don’t confuse PR and ranked ballot. The argument you’re making is one people sometimes make against proportional systems. A ranked ballot represents the will of the constituents of that riding. No speculations involved.
@therealfrasio @rollie1356 @beehugger29 @IshatReza Select the candidate that represents the will of a constituency- sounds like the same goal to me. ( unless you’re being cynical and stating the goal of Canadian elections is different, which might be true). Re:the cbc article - MMP is NOT ranked ballot.
@therealfrasio @rollie1356 @beehugger29 @IshatReza Does the Conservative party choose its leaders with a FPTP vote? Of course not! They realize that would be unfair and not representative of the will of their party members. (I guess they are less concerned about the fairness and the will of the whole Canadian populace though…)
@ArpaSelect@acoyne Separate question: People will argue PR vs. regional seat representation (with arguments to be made on both sides). Good debate to have.
But in our current Westminster system, having ridings selected FPTP doesn’t represent the will of those ridings.
@Andy_Ball_819 @acoyne It’s a recipe for allowing people to use their vote to chose what they want. Whatever the majority of Canadians choose to do with there vote, is a separate question - but they should have that right