@nytimes Seems everyone was waiting on how SPCX was going to perform. A bit odd tho, if things were so clearly 'on the up' around AI, why wait? Unless...
@radiofun8 Really cool! 😀 For a second I thought the triangle and square elements were mutated from actual circles... that would have been amazing but maybe not needed since the effect kinda feels like that anyway. Are the elements actually working buttons?
@chhopsky “I couldn’t kill that player because I’m BETTER, so my bullets make LESS damage” - “That player killed me because they are WORSE, so their bullets do MORE damage” — perfect, “bulletproof” cope 😅
@uncle_authority I read this and it made me angry, so this is a very American opinion indeed 👏 Maybe adding a mandatory 🦅 in front of the date would push it higher
@chhopsky I’m a bit, confused I guess, on how “No SBMM” was the first thing mentioned as the ‘key feature”. It reads as “We tried making the best looking water in games” — games should be fun and give players a reason to return… an important reason on why matchmaking logic is so complex
@TheRealOneFrom1@huacha_roja Pero amigo… es como decir que te gusta el pisco sour pero sin pisco. Yo solo quiero que el pueblo lea un nivel más allá de la Wikipedia 😔
@TheRealOneFrom1@huacha_roja Ya vale, te compro. Hagamos algo, pon en tu perfil lo que dices acá: “Amo el glorioso y exitoso modelo político-económico en China!” - Si tú lo haces, yo lo hago también. Ok? Así todos somos consecuentes 👍
@drfell22@TheRealOneFrom1@huacha_roja El modelo Schrödinger chino: comunista cuando me conviene, capitalista cuando me conviene. Recoja un libro amigo, tiene miedo de aprender algo?