@A_May_MD Appreciate all the knowledge you share on here. Everyone has to trade their own path and beware the risk every stock comes with especially biotech which you always highlight
From my reading of the declarations is they all talk about shell briefs being sent around etc and no one noticed the change which seems reasonable. The papas declaration though seems to be the one who says she included it in her draft that ends up being inadvertently included but she does still seem to advocate the position even in her declaration that she believes the site supports their contention. Essentially not making up new evidence but that the law that existed supports that they are right on prior art. The laws the law and I’m not going to pretend to know anything in this area of law but if that’s correct it doesn’t seem improper and is uthr again pointing ANDREWs to why they think they win
No one will be disbarred but to allow this without some sort of sanctions and ruling in favor of lqda would be in poor form. Honorable attorneys and judges (like Judge Andrews) hate scumbags who make the whole profession look bad. I just still don’t understand why we are so delayed in the olion and this being pointed out. It’s what has be confused
@Biomaven@zipjet You owe a duty of candor to the court and to correct anything improperly asserted. It’s certainly not “work product” to intentionally not do so but was rather a strategic play