no_secrets

web3sec | zk | opinions are my own

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

if you are talking about blockchain/defi, why are you citing the opinions of others as if that gives any extra merit here, instead of looking at on-chain statistics
what is the probability a protocol will get hacked given that it is open source vs if it's closed source? look at ethereum vs solana for instance
should be pretty obvious the former is significantly higher. you can compute the conditional probabilities yourself if you want
the obvious game theoretic reasoning is that it's much easier for a human to find severe flaws in code that both they and AI can read without anything that obfuscates the program behavior. citing a bunch of people does not change that

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

do you
- use codex w/ gpt 5.5
- give it knowledge base of past valid and past invalid findings
- give it tool calling and testing abilities on the codebase associated with the bounty program
- have it empirically validate the findings independently without relying on the reporter's PoC, then compare independent root cause analysis to reporter claims + PoC
- automate this at least partially

if you don't do all these things then you are not making maximal use of the tools available to solve this triaging problem

compound this with the fact that your reply here looks extremely AI assisted if not AI generated. you are likely complaining about others' alternate uses of that which you benefit from (which is not going away, so adapt)

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@bbl4de_xyz @immunefi LFG

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@Donkortess56 @filosofiadoalto @miniapeur

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@flowidealism lol

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@outpxce Maybe good opsec is so rare that it is signal moreso than it hides people

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@4gontuk Congrats 🔥🔥🔥🔥

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@jaginger @frankmaraschino @gphelpsIII @TheJFreakinC Yes yes apply all the conditions you need until it makes sense. You seem to love and hate amendments at the same time

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@jaginger @frankmaraschino @gphelpsIII @TheJFreakinC “the feds can do whatever they want” is plainly incorrect. Exit the denial stage pls

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@jaginger @frankmaraschino @gphelpsIII @TheJFreakinC Maybe don’t say things that are flatly wrong next time buddy
And be grateful you live in a country where the feds cannot in fact “do whatever they want”

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@philipgporter Look into the mirror not the window

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

You are now deliberately concentrating your previously general statement that "the feds can do whatever they want" now that I have shown you how absurd it is. Now you have backpedaled to "the judges in every state"

The supremacy clause does not mandate universal, unconditional override of state law. For that to be the case, it would imply that there is absolutely zero ambiguity in deciding which one applies in which situation. And that is false. The 10th amendment acknowledges this by delegating any powers not explicitly delegated to fed govt to the states.

For heavens sake bro just understand what you are reading instead of looking for the little piece that confirms your biases (and no, i did not do this)

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

No, it does not. Read your own sources before citing them

“To prevent the federal government’s newly expanded powers from smothering state regulatory authority, the Court simultaneously narrowed the circumstances in which federal law displaced state law. Besides retreating from the “automatic” field preemption of the early twentieth century, the Court articulated a “presumption against preemption,” under which federal law does not displace state law “unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress.”

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@FXStrypes @TypeErrorDev @HeroDividend He has sense of what matters, which is the result. Not three extra minutes that don’t contribute to the result

That is why he is trusted to protect a country, and you are trusted with a cubicle and excel spreadsheet

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@DMiller52325459 Nothing lame about pointing out the difference between nice pictures and what the human eye actually sees. Also I can still reply even if you didn’t address me and I don’t follow you. You do not control others’ words unless you restrict the post lol

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@tetsuoai He lied about the side lengths after sliding the triangles
Also he moved the halves out slightly

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@iyugov @Math_files 👍

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@iyugov @Math_files Alright bro

Let $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_{26} \in \mathbb{R}$. Compute:

$$
(x_{25} - x_1)(x_{25} - x_2) \cdots (x_{25} - x_{26})
$$

You happy now?

[no_secrets @no___secrets___]

@iyugov @Math_files Stop being pedantic
You know the alphabet and you know exactly what it implies