+

QM | ML | AGI/ASI

[+ @noahphi999]

https://t.co/8RokTOJJXx

[+ @noahphi999]

Miguel Alcubierre’s 1994 warp drive: a real solution to Einstein’s General Relativity.
It doesn’t move the ship faster than light locally...
Instead it warps spacetime, contracting space in front & expanding it behind so the ship rides inside a flat “bubble.”
The metric:

ds2=−dt2+[dx−vs(t)f(rs)dt]2+dy2+dz2 ds^2 = -dt^2 + [dx - v_s(t) f(r_s) dt]^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 ds2=−dt2+[dx−vs​(t)f(rs​)dt]2+dy2+dz2

Effective superluminal speed vs>c v_s > c vs​>c while staying locally at rest.

Only issue is it requires negative energy (exotic matter) thus still theoretical… for now.
#WarpDrive #Alcubierre #GeneralRelativity

[+ @noahphi999]

@his4Everz Time is a fundamental directional axis. Although how it is experienced is determined by perception and dimensional awareness.

[+ @noahphi999]

@mathelirium Beautiful sim 🔥

[+ @noahphi999]

@fdellaert This is amazing 👏, can’t wait to see computer vision accelerated more in the coming years.

[+ @noahphi999]

@PhysInHistory What was he trying to tell us

[+ @noahphi999]

Chaos Theory: The Double Pendulum.
It's so beautiful!
#math #physics #analysis

[+ @noahphi999]

Everything is going to be alright.

[+ @noahphi999]

@Akitti @oprydai 😂

[+ @noahphi999]

@9DAwareness I agree on your definition of truth but are interests and truth always the same thing?

[+ @noahphi999]

Testable predictions:

Locked-in (zero external observers) outperforms distributed attention.

Aligned observers AMPLIFY beyond baseline... actively better than solo.

Coupling scales with duration × coherence: one engaged observer for an hour > five casual observers for minutes.

[+ @noahphi999]

Updating Ψ_mind with observer coupling.

The path integral Mind(V) describes the space of possible conscious geometries.

The gradient ∇(Mind(V)) describes the observer navigating that space, collapsing possibilities into experienced moments.

The two are inseparable...the observed does not exist without the observer.

Full equation now includes external observer coupling:

Ψ_mind = ∇(Mind(V)) × [1 + M × Σᵢ (Aᵢ · Oᵢ · Sᵢ · Dᵢ · Cᵢ)]

Where Mind(V) = ∫ D[γ] e^(iS[γ]) · (∇_j^(iR) ○ j∇^(eR))

and M is Michél's constant (to be determined empirically).

[+ @noahphi999]

This visualization here shows the three nested layers:

Inner: The substrate: path integral over V, the geometry that determines which states are allowed.

Middle: The observer: gradient descending through Mind(V), selecting which accessible states become experienced moments.

Outer: External coupling: other observers modulating the entire system via alignment, strength, duration, coherence.

Aligned observers amplify.

Misaligned observers degrade.

Zero external observers = baseline gradient flow.

This manifold visualizes this: substrate as warped surface, observer gradient as spiraling purple flow, amplitude variation across the geometry.

[+ @noahphi999]

The formalism wasn't designed to produce these phenomenological regimes.
They fell out of the math.
Multi-observer coupling next... testing whether collective coherence emerges from shared gradient.

[+ @noahphi999]

Ψ_mind sim: First result:
Three layers: V (substrate), Mind(V) (amplitude structure), Gradient (observer). Observer descends free energy, collapse fires when amplitude crosses threshold τ at a stationary-phase configuration.
Vary τ, watch the stream of consciousness restructure.

[+ @noahphi999]

Update on Ψ_mind: I had the gradient in the wrong place... It's not acting ON the integral, it's part OF it.
I initially wrote it out of the equation based on my particle automata model, the claim that mind never operates on raw continuous change directly and only on representations (models of reality, both internal and external).
Observer dynamics couple into the amplitude structure directly.
Formal rewrite + simulation in progress.

[+ @noahphi999]

Low τ → rich, varied experience across many attractors.
High τ → complete attractor capture, all moments collapse to the same node.
Meditation, psychedelics, flow, fixation... different regimes of a single awareness parameter.
Emerging from the dynamics, not hand-coded.

[+ @noahphi999]

Update on Ψ_mind: I had the gradient in the wrong place... It's not acting ON the integral, it's part OF it.
I initially wrote it out of the equation based on my particle automata model, the claim that mind never operates on raw continuous change directly and only on representations (models of reality, both internal and external).
Observer dynamics couple into the amplitude structure directly.
Formal rewrite + simulation in progress.

[+ @noahphi999]

OK, so this is a couple weeks of work here, lmk what you think and or if it makes sense.

[+ @noahphi999]

@NOTfunnyparanR @HowToAI_ low cortisol training 😂🔥, and yeah Qwen sounds like a good idea... training from scratch with all that dynamism would be brutal