WE the people.... Husband, Father, Sports Nut, NLPoker Player, Conservative, Christian; Not Against Progress - Truth & Common Sense MUST Prevail; Husker Alum.
Someone shared this with me, it is the truth! 🙏🇺🇸❤️🌎🙏
The Muslim religion is the fastest growing religion per capita in the United States, especially in the minority races.
Last month I attended a training. During the training session there was a presentation by three speakers representing the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Muslim faiths, who each explained their beliefs.
I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say. The Muslim gave a great presentation of the basics of Islam, complete with a video.
After the presentations, time was provided for questions and answers. When it was my turn, I directed my question to the Muslim and asked:
'Please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a holy jihad [Holy war] against the infidels of the world and, that by killing an infidel, (which is a command to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven. If that's the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?'
There was no disagreement with my statements and, without hesitation, he replied, " Nonbelievers"
I responded, 'So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not of your faith so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?'
The expression on his face changed from one of authority and command to that of a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the cookie jar.'
He sheepishly replied, 'Yes.'
I then stated, 'Well, sir, I have a real problem trying to imagine The Pope commanding all Catholics to kill those of your faith or Dr. Stanley ordering all Protestants to do the same in order to guarantee them a place in heaven!'
The Muslim was speechless.
I continued, 'I also have a problem with being your friend when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me! Let me ask you a question:
Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to kill me in order for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells me to love you because I am going to heaven and He wants you to be there with me?'
You could have heard a pin drop.
Needless to say, the organizers and/or promoters of the 'Diversification' training seminar were not happy with my way of dealing with the Islamic Imam, and exposing the truth about the Muslims' beliefs.
In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the US. to elect the President.
I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on! This is your chance to make a difference.
Just Copy & paste.
The chief benefit from rising atmospheric CO₂ levels is an undeniable increase in planetary green leaf cover, now clearly visible from space.
This fresh greening covers an area twice the size of the continental United States - yet it remains ignored by the institutional forces driving a narrative of climate emergency, and largely overlooked in the mainstream media.
Data from NASA’s MODIS satellite instruments tells the real story. Rather than triggering global collapse, the rise in CO₂ sparked a massive expansion in the green canopy, stimulating agricultural yields (some cereal crops up by 280%) and natural ecosystems alike. This 'CO₂ fertilisation effect' occurs as plants perform photosynthesis more efficiently while losing less water through their stomata.
Meanwhile, the global economy has been severely disrupted by a 40-year campaign built on forecasts of environmental doom from anthropogenic CO₂. This trace gas is not a climate control knob. It is the fundamental driver of biological photosynthesis and oxygen production.
These campaigns, led by UN activism, demand a rapid, forced transition away from hydrocarbon energy. Yet wind and solar cannot supply the dense baseload power required for steel production and heavy industry. Hydrocarbon fuels still provide 82% of global primary power.
This entire transition is justified under the warning that CO₂ emissions are leading the planet to the brink of catastrophe - with the total cost of this pointless pivot estimated at a staggering $275 trillion.
Earth's geological history, paired with empirical satellite data, reveal a completely different reality: CO₂ is a powerful agent of biological enrichment. Its capacity to drive runaway global warming faces steep, immovable physical limitations.
A critical pillar of atmospheric physics is how the warming effect of CO₂ continually reduces along a sliding logarithmic curve. The first 100 ppm of CO₂ exert the greatest impact on capturing outgoing infrared radiation. But as concentrations rise, absorption bands rapidly saturate. Each subsequent doubling of CO₂ yields an ever-smaller increment of radiative warmth.
The concept of a runaway warming feedback loop loses its theoretical foundation under actual atmospheric conditions, where the 'rate of warming' diminishes progressively. Yet this debunked narrative is routinely recycled to fuel panic.
Annual COP climate summits over the past thirty years also endlessly amplify this agenda of fear, functioning largely as high-end junkets for global elites.
In geological terms, atmospheric CO₂ is in long-term decline - a fact carefully airbrushed from IPCC worst-case scenarios. During the Cambrian period, atmospheric CO₂ peaked as high as 7,000 ppm. Even with those immense concentrations, there was no global boiling; instead, it marked the greatest explosion of biological diversity in Earth's history.
During the Last Glacial Maximum (26,000 to 19,000 years ago), CO₂ levels plummeted to roughly 180 ppm - dangerously close to the 150 ppm threshold below which most C3 plant life starves and dies. From a long-term evolutionary perspective, modern levels hovering above 420 ppm represent a vital, partial recovery from a geologically recent carbon drought, rather than a precursor to apocalypse.
Today’s global average temperature sits at approximately 15°C. In the context of the history of complex life on land, this is remarkably cold. Earth’s baseline historical temperature average was closer to 24°C, characterised by ice-free poles and expansive, highly productive ecosystems. Our current global average actually reflects a colder-than-average ice age regime.
Global climates are not controlled by trace gases. They are driven by massive, slow-moving astronomical, oceanic, and tectonic forces - such as Milankovitch orbital cycles or the shifting configuration of continents blocking equatorial ocean currents.
Last year the surface of the Greenland Ice Sheet gained a record amount of ice, and this year it is gaining mass even faster - about 25 billion tons of new snow already this month.
https://t.co/Ekp80rmuR0
20 years ago ABC broadcast a docudrama called The Path to 9/11 showing all the national security failures the 90s that led to the attacks
The movie was banned due to political pressure from the Clintons
Here is Part 1 in full:
In 2007, @algore was awarded the @NobelPrize for making a science fiction movie about climate. At the ceremony he predicted an ice-free Arctic by 2014. Since then Arctic sea ice extent has increased 9%.
@NSIDC maps here:
https://t.co/wZDWitW1By
https://t.co/qlKbL2TAUy
Wind and solar cannot replace coal, oil and gas as the world’s power workhorse. It's because of the physics, the slogans and empty promises.
'Renewables' are built from costly and high-maintenance, low-yield technologies. They degrade from the day one and do not run when needed. Wind and solar harnessing devices are intermittent by their nature. They do not deliver baseload power. Whether they have delivered a net public return on the subsidies that built them, is a separate accounting issue; but the machines themselves do not.
They are not simple to build either. They are highly complex arrays of electronics, specialised glass, composite blades and concrete. Like any appliance, they wear out. For many early rooftop buyers, that has already happened: their panels are now roof junk.
A wind turbine cannot take all the energy out of the air that passes by. In 1919 Albert Betz showed why: if the blades extracted 100 percent of wind’s kinetic energy, the air behind them would stop, and new wind could not enter.
The theoretical maximum for an open-flow turbine is 59.3 percent. In the field, good machines reach about 45 percent, but only in ideal wind conditions. Over a year, global capacity factors sit roughly in the mid-20s to high-30s, depending on site. It's a built-in mechanical bottleneck.
Solar also hits a wall of its own. Standard silicon cells sit under the Shockley–Queisser limit of about 33 percent. Much of the incoming spectrum is either too energetic and is lost as heat, or too weak and passes through unused.
Nameplate claims of 'clean power from the skies' do not change this energy loss. Commercial arrays lose energy from the angle of the sun, dirt, heat and failing inverters. Rooftop capacity factors are often around 12–15 percent; commercial solar sits higher, but still far below promised production levels.
Because they only work 'sometimes', they need a second backup system, because they were not designed to integrate into the existing grid as dispatchable power. So to compensate, they created more wires, more backup gas and short-lived battery arrays.
On a net-zero path, BloombergNEF has put the global grid-upgrade bill at about $21 trillion by 2050. That is the price of redundant machines that cannot hold the load on their own.Homeowners discovered the rest.
Rooftop solar does not start a washing machine or a dryer after dark. As early subsidies and high feed-in tariffs fade, owners keep paying daily grid charges while output falls. Solar panels are warrantied for decades; but the string inverters are not.
Ten to fifteen years is a common solar lifespan. When it dies, power generation stops. What remains on the roof is expensive silent hardware. They promised power from wind and sunlight.
But the physics never allowed it.
🚨 LISTEN TO EVERY WORD OF THIS SPEECH.
Marco Rubio is talking about the terrible mistake America made with manufacturing.
But listen again and think about America’s SKILLED WORKFORCE.
We were told it didn’t matter WHERE things were made.
Find the lowest cost.
Maximize efficiency.
Maximize profits.
Then we woke up and realized we had hollowed out our own industrial capacity and become dangerously dependent on other countries.
Now we’re being told something remarkably similar about our skilled workforce.
It doesn’t matter WHO develops the software, engineers the systems, analyzes the data or builds the technology.
Just find the talent wherever it comes from.
Meanwhile, American graduates are trying to break into these careers while employers can recruit through H-1B, OPT, STEM OPT and CPT.
Here’s the lesson I take from Rubio’s speech:
A country’s capacity isn’t just its factories.
It’s its PEOPLE.
Their skills.
Their experience.
Their knowledge.
Their careers.
Rubio says 21st-century reindustrialization will require workers with MORE skills and more education.
So let’s build that capacity here.
Train Americans.
Hire Americans.
Develop Americans.
We spent decades learning what happens when we outsource our industrial capacity.
Let’s not learn the same lesson with our human capital.
@SecRubio@JDVance@SusieWiles47@realDonaldTrump@RepRileyMoore
A modern combined-cycle gas plant turns more than 60% of the fuel into electricity - exactly 'when you need it'.
It’s known as 'dispatchable power' — the kind that keeps the lights on at 7pm in a cold July, when everyone’s home and the air-con is roaring.
Nuclear looks worse (on paper): because around a third of the heat becomes electricity. But then you look at the rest of the picture. US nuclear plants run around 90% of the time. A pellet of fuel the size of a fingertip replaces a tonne of coal. The plant sits on a small patch of land for 60 or 80 years. Operating emissions are basically nothing.
So gas wins on speed and cost to build. Nuclear wins on density and how little it has to be touched once it’s running. Both give you firm power and neither cares if the wind drops.
Wind and solar are a different energy product, cheap to run and clean. Lifecycle emissions are low — wind especially. That’s real. But what they don’t do is deliver dense energy 'on demand'.
In the US, solar produces 25% of its nameplate over the year. Wind is closer to a third. The rest of the time you need something else to power your life: gas, batteries, overbuild or long wires.
They also take up a lot of land and a lot of costly, structural overbuild for each kilowatt-hour. And they wear out in 20–30 years. Blades and panels are only partly recycled at this scale. We are about to find out what that looks like as the first big wave of wind farms comes down.
None of this means 'don’t build wind and solar'. It means stop pretending that a megawatt of solar is the same thing as a megawatt of nuclear or gas. One is energy when wind blows and the sun is shining. The other is dense energy whenever it's needed.
Grids that ignore that difference still end up reverting to hydrocarbon energy, usually gas. Then everyone seems surprised.
Energy density - availability on demand — that’s the comparison that actually matters.
🚨 WOW! Sec. Marco Rubio just MIC DROPPED the globalist United Nations accusing Trump of causing a "humanitarian crisis" in Cuba due to no oil
"If Cuba is a humanitarian disaster? It's because their REGIME is a disaster! Because the economic model they follow doesn't WORK."
"Cuba has been a humanitarian catastrophe now for three or four YEARS — and maybe even LONGER — because they didn't invest in their own infrastructure. They STOLE all the money to build hotels and line their own pockets and because they're no longer stealing oil from Venezuela for FREE!" 🔥
"In fact, it's nonsensical because they don't allow private sector to flourish — because they don't allow individual Cubans to choose their own path in life!"
"The reason Cuba has a lack of oil is because Venezuela doesn't give them FREE oil anymore. Understand, they were getting free oil from Venezuela. They were stealing oil from Venezuela and they were getting it for free."
"Some of it, they would use about 30% of it for their own needs, and then they would resell the rest of it for CASH, and that stopped. So that's number one!"
"They were having blackouts before that, even with the Venezuelan oil. Cuba had multiple blackouts over the last three or four years because they didn't invest into their own energy infrastructure. Their economic model doesn't work."
"Cuba is a humanitarian catastrophe? And we've offered them $100 million of humanitarian aid. Others have as well. No one's impeding that from coming in!"
🔥🔥🔥
RUBIO CAN'T BE BEAT!
Honestly, if anyone knows more about Cuba than Marco, it's NOT the United Nations. All they do is parrot anti-American talking points and try to make right-wing leaders look bad
Cuba is suffering because of COMMUNISM, not America. Maybe they should surrender 🇺🇸🇨🇺
Marco Rubio just gave the greatest explanation of how Trump’s New Venezuela Oil Deal will reshape the entire global order:
“Those oil fields were previously dominated by China and Russia, as well as Iran. Iran had some concessions, and they are no longer there.”
“Now those fields will become productive and will generate royalties and income for the Venezuelan people, eventually through a democratically elected government, we hope sooner rather than later.”
This deal will change the west and America for generations. No more will the west have to rely on OPEC and the Middle East for energy and it will benefit the Venezuelan people in the process.
This is why cost of living feels impossibly high. It's not the price of gas per se, or eggs. It's that your discretionary spending is squeezed, due to Obamacare. John McCain cast the deciding vote to force you to have to get it. Neocons and communists are one in the same.
Victor Davis Hanson tells Megyn Kelly to her face the damage Tucker Carlson, MTG, and Thomas Massie are doing to the Republican Party by wanting Trump impeached and supporting Abdul El-Sayed, and the lasting effects their toxic influence is going to have in 2028.
The problem with flock cameras:
They don’t prevent crime, they just help you figure out who did the crime
So when the “crime” is a guy in an insured and registered car pull up to a red light at 2 o’clock in the morning, there’s no one around for miles, so he just decides to drive through it to get home and go to bed, they catch him and they punish him
But when the crime is a violent rape or assault by a member of the Democrat Party shock troops (a.k.a. career criminals) even if they catch him, they don’t actually punish him.
So when you ask why I’m against mass surveillance, it’s not that I don’t see the potential benefits of it. It’s that I know that the downsides of it will be aimed at me, a law abiding citizen.
And I know this because this is how every gun regulation works. Criminals still get access to whatever guns they want. But if I met my Massachusetts residence and I have a 30 round magazine, I can go to jail for it. Meanwhile, the members of the superior caste, they have no problem carrying around a 30 round magazine.
If these things have been around during Covid, they would’ve turned them off for the George Floyd riots, but they’d have used it to nail me going to church or going to the beach.
So take your flock cameras and shove them up your ass.
BESSENT: "Somehow, supply and demand does matter in the labor market, especially when it comes to immigration... When we stop the mass, unfettered immigration and had 2-3 million deportations, working Americans make more money, and have more jobs!"
If you ever asked the question or wondered who was in charge of the globalist assault to create the One World Order, there is one book that connects the dots better than any other I’ve ever read…it connects directly to the Globalist Agenda 2030 all the way to the end of our constitutional republic.
We can win, but we all need to better understand our enemy. They’re very real.
@MelKShow
https://t.co/o0jG4vUO4H