@DanSchneierNFL The NFL playoffs structure limits that impact.
The Giants didn't play a single playoff home game in that run.
Other leagues structures leaving the potential for a much longer and more sustained local impact.
@SkylarSkye3@CF101B The issue with Ontario is that it is both huge and absolutely littered with lakes.
You can't make a straight highway going across it as the roads need to weave around all the lakes.
BC is similar, except the problem there is that most of the province is varying mountain ranges.
@JoshuaTelford1@LachInTheCrease Because the Canes were not married to starting a specific goalie no matter how bad he was.
Their starter wasn't even accused of rape but they still sat him.
Meanwhile Vegas had a cup winning goalie on the bench but stuck with the historically bad sex pest against all reason.
@OCAgbese@MetalheadHarris@SeppBlatter In regards to locking someone up in prison yes.
In regards to admitting a foreign national who is already being accused of sex crimes in a prior country that admitted them?
Nope.
@MetalheadHarris@SeppBlatter Canada denied entry to a player arrested for and currently awaiting trial for multiple sex crimes.
Not really the same thing.
@stopeatingfaces@JoshYohe_PGH McDavid won it this year. It was already announced.
The players thought McDavid was the MVP.
The media had people voting for Nick Suzuki.
@JoshYohe_PGH You are illustrating their point.
Hart voters are generally clueless.
Lemieux getting robbed by clueless Hart voters isn't a justification for other players getting robbed by clueless Hart voters.
It is justification for getting rid of clueless Hart voters.
@hilly5353@streetfighthard And a go/no go pedestrian light with the go indicator on for the opposite crossing.
It very much looks like they were jaywalking, and then the dipshit decides to stand in front of an oncoming car frantically trying to stop on wet pavement.
Dipshits all around.
@FarkusBuckmeyer@USA_Polling No.
That was you getting confused.
I assumed you had the common sense necessary to understand that you would amend the constitution first, because that is how a reasonable person would expect it to go.
I gave you too much credit.
@FarkusBuckmeyer@USA_Polling Lol who said anything obout changing the constitution after.
You amend the constitution first, and then implement the law.
And that is something any sovereign nation can do.
Also not really the point of my post, but it is a second thing you are confused about.
@FarkusBuckmeyer@USA_Polling I see it went over your head.
Any Sovereign nation can make any law it wants, even ones prohibited by their constitution, because with enough public support you could change the constitution.
And in this of non democracies they really can just do it without that hassle.
@FarkusBuckmeyer@USA_Polling There being no tax provision is not the same thing as not being able make a tax provision.
Sovereign countries can make any law they want, if enough of the population supports it.