@Albert_Kim2022@charlescerb set-piece oriented haramball with positional fluidity is the new meta, fortunately Lee is built for exactly this. Aguirre-RCDM era, but at Champions League knockout level. 10+ assists just from corners. Sorloth will eat.
@JohnLeupp@JOBhakdi It would have been a good move to have predicted that NVIDIA would own the AI semi market, and to have invested in them before it showed up in the financials and the stock re-rated accordingly. The objective is to try and guess what will happen in the future before it happens.
@nullvoider07@XFreeze Nature didn't take "billions of years" to build human intelligence. There's no evidence that modern crocodiles are smarter than their Triassic antecedents. It is more correct to say that, after billions of years, one branch of living organisms evolved intelligence rapidly.
@typhalive I maintain that PSG have only seen his floor. He's capable of so much more when used as the conductor rather than 5th violinist. Dembele and Vitinha being (justifiably) entrenched in the big match XI means PSG will never see his best level.
@zay4337 @FSFootball_ imo the Venn diagram of "clubs that could reach latter stages of UCL in any given year" and "clubs where LKI can become the main protagonist" has a pretty narrow intersection and Atleti are squarely in there.
@zay4337 @FSFootball_ Disagree, I think he would fit perfectly. Being the protagonist of the attack rather than a peripheral figure. Possession-ball brings out his worst, playing safe too often. He was more dynamic at Mallorca. ATM is probably the highest status club where he'd be the focal point.
Suppose there already existed a "utopia" where food, shelter, healthcare, etc are ~0 cost. Is the logical conclusion then that net "wellbeing" (however defined) would increase if artificial scarcity was imposed such that not everyone could access healthcare etc, and the subset of the population that has access must qualify by showing up at an office from 9-6 for decades doing busywork?
@Josh_Rodriguez_ Obviously you think the kind of weapon makes a difference, or you would have just said "he was carrying a gun" instead of adding buzzwords like "AK47" and "automatic weapon". He was legally open-carrying a gun. That does not permit anyone to attack him.
@Josh_Rodriguez_ I wasn't trying to make you change your mind. I was pointing out that either you're lying or that you lack basic facts about the case. Either scenario kinda undermines your opinion, don't you think?
@Josh_Rodriguez_ Moreover, you seem to be ignorant of--or willfully misrepresenting--basic facts about the case. Rittenhouse was carrying an AR-15 rifle which is neither an "AK-47" nor an "automatic weapon".