@cabinsmountain Why wouldn't you cover the face beam to the edge? Why are these so perfectly flat and thin? Why are the cuts rounded? Why isn't it straight? Why aren't there screws at the top of that nearest one?
Qwen3.5-27B is underrated. on this test concerning detecting if a question is ambiguous or not, 3.5 performs the best. These tests were run in native precision, no quantization. This is related to my work on the next version of Peacebell. I'm on the verge of just using 3.5 for everything non-coding related.
@broodsugar@dhh@MrOrange2222 that's a gut punch - and it distracts from genuine discussion. You're doing it on purpose. You should reply to the meaning of his words - man is the human race as a whole. Don't even reply to me.
Would we rather have suspected fraud reported than known fraud not reported? I'm thinking about the false accusations. On the one hand, we are supposedly innocent until proven guilty - but that's bs and everyone knows it. Paying for a lawyer to defend yourself can ruin your life, loose your home, all your assets, you can loose your job while the trial is ongoing and nobody will hire you with that looming over your head and they'll say you didn't give enough 'eye contact' during the interview and will pass. How many times have we seen a person deplatformed because of a false accusation?
I think the backwards justice system needs revamped while we are at it - making it criminal to adversely affect someone whom has been accused before court judgement is reached - and somehow balance a fortune 200's lawyer power and money with what a wage worker can afford... lots of problems... I don't have the answers.
@Brianna_1q@realDonaldTrump maybe there should be substantial monetary incentives for reporting fraud, in addition to the proposed mandatory sentences for not reporting it.
sure, that's a truth. I've described it differently. I imagine every person more or less having the same potential - which I compare roughly to a tank of fuel in a car. You can travel perhaps 350 miles on your tank, but some choose to make a lot of turns and take a lot of side tours while others stay on one path the entire time, going very far (in one direction). After thinking about this for a very long time (years), I think both are OK. you have to make the best choices with the cards you've got at the time. With the assumption that everyone is making the best possible choices with their cards. And maybe that's the problem - maybe people aren't making the best choices with their cards every time. Though also, it's hard to find the motivation to think about the best choices when you've not spent a lot of time training yourself to make the best choices, and when you're very tired from a physically or mentally demanding day job. I think we kind of need to slow down to speed up.