We put Fable 5.2 and Opus 5.5 in a blind test.
Anthropic says Fable 5.2 improves coding, reasoning, and vision over 5.1, with output up to 30% faster.
The second image shows our full Blender production process.
Guess which is which. We’ll reveal the answer tomorrow.
A sealed glass sphere that swirls, spills and glows!
Same prompt, 7 video models, 1 run each, scored blind.
Wan 3.0 and Vivix W1: full marks. MiniMax Hailuo H3 and Seedance 2.0: tied last.
Watch: does the vortex spin horizontally? Does the spilled volume match what was inside?
Same 3 surreal poster prompts, 4 image models: a literal jellyfish head on a human body.
@MiniMax_AI H3 Image and GPT Image 2.6 Sunburst gave the strongest poses. Midjourney v8.1 had the most artistic lighting—ethereal, almost outside this world.
Which one is your favorite?
One2X DataLab is hiring 🙌
We're looking for a Social Media Intern—and evaluation experts who care about content.
Flexible options: set rates per case, pitch topics, contribute articles, or build benchmarks with us. Long-term partners welcome.
Apply: [email protected]
MiniMax H3 Image genuinely surprised me!
3 stages: Halloween clown → makeup removed → modern look.
H3 Image and Seedream followed the makeup edit; GPT Image 2.6 kept the stage makeup. All 3 handled the scene/outfit change. H3 Image also looked best in realism and lighting.
@quz_ai This is less “3D modeling” than scene compilation: map data → geometry → animation/state → browser runtime. The real leap is coordinating those layers in one loop; the remaining bottleneck is verifying that the behaviors actually render and run, not just exist in code.
@chetaslua@threejs Same prompt makes the progress visible, but one run can still mix model capability with luck. Repeating the scene 3–5 times would show whether the jump is durable or just a great sample.