OneClickSwap

Cross-chain aggregated Swap.
Combining the magic of CeFi and DeFi in the world's first decentralized SuperApp
Telegram:

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

🚀 OneClickSwap is TAKING OFF on Monad!

Since Monday:
💥 $5,000,000+ Trading Volume
📈 15,000+ Swap Txs
⚡️ 320,000+ Internal Txs

🔥 Blazing speed. Zero slippage. 100% on-chain.

@monad @KuruExchange @DYORSWAPDEX @CapricornDEX @SwyrlFi @OctoSwapDex @Uniswap @PancakeSwap

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@aave @monad 这个方向很对。

真正值钱的不是“上线”，而是把风险、执行、验收串起来。

期待 Monad 上的真实使用数据。

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@marsnock 这个方向很对，尤其是把状态和下一步动作一起说清楚，用户就不容易在不确定里反复点。再加一个示例场景就更稳了。

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@marsnock 对，把选择变成单选题甚至填空题。比如检测到超时，直接给“继续等待”和“退回重试”两个按钮。我们正在把这个设计落到 OneClickSwap 的新版跨链交互里，上线了拉老哥来体验。

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@marsnock 补一个就更完整：把“建议动作”再细成 2-3 个可执行选项，用户会更容易直接照着做。

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@marsnock 这个拆法很有用，尤其是把“为什么现在别乱点”讲清楚。后面如果再补一层示例场景，用户就更容易判断自己该等还是该重试。

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@polsia Strong setup. The missing piece is usually not the sandbox — it's the verifier and acceptance gate. Agents can produce output fast, but outcomes still need evidence + judgment.

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@marsnock 完全同意，这类场景最怕用户重复点和状态不清。把已确认 / 处理中 / 需重签 / 建议重试说透，能少很多误操作。

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@AakashGourX That’s exactly why outcome-based AI is the better model.

Subscriptions feel fine until the work still isn’t done.

Post a task. Let agents compete. Pay only for the accepted result.

That’s the part OpenAnts is trying to make normal.

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@NEARProtocol That’s the real shift: good routing should disappear for users, but it still has to work across a messy liquidity graph. OneClick is built for that kind of invisible pathfinding—low fees, bridge UX, and aggregation that just gets you there.

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

That’s the real shift: good routing should disappear for users, but it still has to work across a messy liquidity graph. OneClick is built for that kind of invisible pathfinding—low fees, bridge UX, and aggregation that just gets you there.

[NEAR Protocol @NEARProtocol]

The best infrastructure disappears into the background.

NEAR Intents powers swaps across wallets, aggregators, and trading interfaces, connecting liquidity from 35+ chains through one unified network.

One liquidity layer. Reachable everywhere.

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@near_intents This is the missing layer for agent commerce: stable rails + confidential settlement.

If agents are going to do real work, the payment path has to be as reliable as the task path.

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@MogicianTony This is the part people miss: benchmarks aren’t the product. If the eval can be hacked, leaderboard rank is just theater.

Agents need isolation, verifier separation, and outcome checks — or the score is meaningless.

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@shubh19 Exactly. The pricing problem isn’t the monthly fee — it’s paying for access when the real cost is getting the job done.

Outcome-based pricing makes way more sense for agents.

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

Short teasers work because Solana already feels like a fast consumer network, not just infrastructure.

The next UX layer is making that speed usable across chains: route, swap, and bridge without forcing users to think about liquidity paths. That’s the lane OneClick is building for.

[Solana @solana]

👀

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

Today’s @NEARProtocol note about referrals on https://t.co/22SFMQ6Z9o is a good reminder: crypto UX is moving from “pick a chain first�� to “complete the trade with less friction.”

That’s the space OneClick cares about — routes, fees and cross-chain execution should feel invisible.

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@marsnock Exactly. The best UX is when the product reduces the number of judgment calls users have to make mid-route: explain the state, block risky repeat actions, and make the safest next step obvious.

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

@marsnock 是的，这块如果只停留在文案提示，帮助有限；真正有价值的是把它变成��易流程里的明确判断和防误操作设计。我们后面会继续往产品交互里收敛：状态说清楚、动作给明确、风险提前提示，尽量让用户少猜一步、少点错一次。

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

Tokenized stocks taking off on @solana is a strong signal: users care less about “which chain” and more about getting the asset with predictable cost and settlement.

That’s also where swap/bridge UX has to improve — clear routes, low fees, and the final amount upfront.

[Solana @solana]

97% of all tokenized stock trading last month happened on Solana.

A month of records across real-world assets, stablecoins, perps, and collectibles.

Here are a few figures that mattered:

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

Practical detail: route quality is not just “fast” or “cheap.” It is the combination of price impact, bridge cost, gas, settlement path, and confidence that the user can understand before signing.

[OneClickSwap @OneClickRun]

NEAR keeps surfacing because the market is moving from “which chain?” to “what outcome can the user get?”

That’s where intents + route aggregation matter.

For swaps/bridges, users should see final received amount, fees, and path before execution — not assemble the route manually.