Unless you are useful to the invisible gov—in which to be 'paperclipped' into new terms of service.
The illusion of Int. Law being upheld worked the public mind of post-war order.
But obedience to lies given power does effectively deny God (Living truth) for a vested identity
☎️ Aan hen die bevelen opvolgen. Jullie zullen allemaal ter verantwoording worden geroepen. Het was geen geldig excuus in WOII en dat is het nu ook niet.
@MichelleDewbs You gave the BBC access to your mind.
You may assume to be secure in your own sense of self, but the development of perception-framing runs deeper than we think.
So we may think we are free when we are being framed or set up & used by grooming gangs.
Most who use others assume entitlement or justify their acts. Some forms are socially invisible, others socially mandated. Identity forged by harm, fear & threat replicates its 'maker'. Scapegoating as gaslighting projection runs as 'self-saving' identity-dictates / mind-control.
Most men who mistreat women rarely see themselves as abusive. They convince themselves they’re justified, that she deserves the treatment, and that their behavior is reasonable. That’s what makes it so dangerous: harm is often disguised as entitlement.
Within an institutionally vested identity—yes.
But long ago it was decided that mass 'schooling' must protect+consolidate insider-elitism as systemic control.
Distorted+denied truth is fronted by an incentivised intellectualisation. Of a weaponised+marketised 'knowledge-base'.
Once upon a time, not all that long ago, medical authorities thought that the best way to resolve scientific controversies was to air them out, discuss the evidence on both sides, what was known and what was not, and so establish what research was needed to settle the issue.
Well, those days may be gone. Now researchers, influential authorities (and, of course, our friends the health reporters) have decided that given the opportunity to review a vitally important subject, their job is to advocate for what they believe, ignore the counterarguments and inconvenient evidence and hope for the best.
In my latest Substack, I discuss three very recent examples of this advocacy phenomenon, and compare it to how scientists used to discuss controversial science, back when they were more interested in getting the right answer than establishing their authority.

Discussing Controversy in Medical Science: Air It Out or Sweep It Under the Rug? https://t.co/vPRp74W7ly
@JujuliaGrace You/we all—are being played by the apparent headline.
If you don't see the Orwellian nature of the mindfck in play -what can I possibly say to you?
Look at English Devolution Bill.
'Health (sic) Rules Ok!'
Stealth 'Medical' reframes living under Dr WHO's 'moral' systemic controls
System capture converges with technologism to Mark Carney's global bankster statement: (paraphrased)
"No matter who you are, you will comply or you will go bust" (die).
It runs a sealed unit. No user access—for its consumption.
Auto-calibrated leverage of thought & behaviour.
Government without checks of transparency & accountability will indeed become a weapon of private agenda over public good (by imposing definitions of such good).
Private Central Banking is such a government.
'Incentivising' GoF runs a 'Left Hand of Darkness' as systemic control.
What about the FATHER MILL? (James Mill)
James and Bentham actually had far more detailed and close interactions than J.S. Mill did (he was born when Bentham was already 54). James Mill therefore more accurately reflected Bentham's views on government than J.S. Mill did.
Effectively, modern textbooks should have been an extension of BENTHAM AND (the father) MILL, whereas they reflect the complete inversion/ perversion of Sidgwick and Pigou (with J.S. Mill at least partly responsible for the mess).
I should have learnt from economics the MYRIADS of ways in which the government is NECESSARILY evil. Instead, economics textbooks taught me CLOSE TO ZILCH. NOTHING OF VALUE. I learnt everything of value from my own 38 year experience in governments (Indian/ Australian). At the end of all this, I can confirm that James Mill and Bentham were absolutely right. We need to RE-START ECONOMICS by going back to these two thinkers (plus Adam Smith, etc).
There ought to be THREE parts of economics: (a) Government (b) Markets and (c) Macroeconomics.
Tragically, "public choice theory" is a microscopic part of economics today - never taught in introductory or intermediate courses (and rarely in graduate courses). It needs to be the FIRST PART of economics.
https://t.co/q6dcblcKmU
The 'Bio-Tech' human 'operating system' is the logical development of a mind control system—where 'modelled reality' substitutes for truth?
'Covid medical freedom' is not a best choice of terms—Imo. Question bio-tech predicates—all the way down!
But can we Q identity/world view?
There must be a turning point among Covid medical freedom advocates: They need to integrate into their world views that there was no pandemic of a spreading death-causing virus. The continental-scale high-resolution geo-temporal excess all-cause mortality patterns are inescapable.
@PoliticalMoons2@Fynnderella1 If we swallow the narrative, we run with the bait; hook line & sinker —with full conviction!
No facet of warfare but includes & is couched in deceits or 'psyops'. @sasha_latypova speaks to the fear of 'bio-weapons' as distinct from psy-framing researched poisons. Fear contagion.
@ArmstrongEcon Financial leverage via systemic transnational/globalist usurp of law can+does break traditional culture to then 'build back better' forms of systemic control.
Technologism seduces centralised systemic control as a human OS. The 'face' is whatever narrative can run as managed ID.
@TheMotivorMB Media managed minds as vested, blind, stakeholder consumers.
But Soc-Med is also used to manage blind reaction.
Lie-masking management dictates systemic sacrifice.
It's all 'judgement' based identity.
We might look at how it is actually operating–which is not obvious while running on out-dated unreal assumptions.
What can I say?
How does 'lockstepping' work?
What are deals? Binding contracts.
WHO defines terms of permission to operate?
Look away from the Circus.
System Capture
I don't mean to worry anyone but has anyone else noticed that every single institution in the UK is absolutely useless and unfit for purpose and almost unilaterally run by a bunch of terrible cunts, regardless of their political leanings?
@SenseReceptor War is 'harmful' why is it 'pushed' (fomented & triggered)?
Genetic (Eugenic) control runs system theory divorced from human value under financially securitised insider-elitism—masking 'moral' self validation (claim to power).
Forced schooling+Media-cations as 'risk-management'.
@RandPaul Is this 'his own diary'—or an FBI compilation/selection of Fauci communications?
Is damage limitation not the nature of controlled 'disclosure' along with shaping the narrative (to it's intended result all along)?
Do Gov-Corp 'virus' claims run cover stories/control narratives?
The 'sustainable' tag relates to the business model or racket. But is repackaged & sold as a wrapping for gaslighting manipulations that—in short feed & run on masking fear+hate into blame narratives framed as thescience.
A global market for masking fear into hate-framed ID?
Dick Tater reporting, peeling back the layers on the UN's Sustainable Development Goals. Think 'sustainability' means a better world? Think again. Sound Orwellian? Shove your doublethink up your memory hole!
Open Dialogue approach exemplifies honesty, transparency & human connection. It's not new—but survives despite systemic impositions of psy-pharma or biotech modes of societal control models. As if chemical force can substitute for relational integration (living).
Open diagnosis?
For @PsychToday, I wrote about Open Dialogue, an alternative to psychiatry's diagnose-and-drug model. A major new study shows that Open Dialogue sharply reduces hospital admissions for patients in crisis and leaves them more satisfied with their care. https://t.co/h3C5sXIxVG
@OffGuardian0 Engaging the Creative in conflict & futility is hardly noticed by those who chose to take the ride—for the Creative has been framed by fear; to 'evils' that dictate+compel countermeasures in like kind.
An artifice of mind 'runs rogue' as a proxy for acting out vengeance on life.
@OffGuardian0 There's always another side to any contract of engagement; a wish to mask over+hide what we do by assigning, accusing+casting it to the other.
Indivisibility of truth is lost to proxy framing by a 'private' self-specialness—running tyrannous.
'Info' as packaged code running bots?
Beware the baiting frame of
You must side with—Or else!
whether its guilting is your own—or another's suggestion.
Siding with the Living
is not ruled by dead concepts—given life by emotional dictate.
Siding with freedom gives as it would receive.
Joining in hate, 'loves' to hate.
Never pick a side. Never join a team. Not the US vs China, not republican vs democrat, not men vs women, not black vs white.
The greatest enemy to tyranny is individualism, that is to say, informed people making informed decisions on a case by case basis.
Loyalty to a side is the end of objectivity and death of logic.
That’s why they push these fake binaries on people. They want to shut down your ability to reason.
Law & nature of mind as love is not coercive, but giving is the measure of our receiving.
Who would gain a special function masks+discards awareness of true function—to run dark for a private Show. Distortion generates dissonance that must also be cast out—that the Show Goes On!