왼손잡이右派 🇰🇷🇺🇲🇯🇵

사~노라면~~언~젠가는~~

[황교안 Hwang Kyo-ahn @hkyoahn]

아무리 표를 맞추고 조작질을 해도 완벽하게 할 수는 없다. 결국 드러나게 돼 있다.
그러니 즉시 '생중계'로 '재개표'하라!

[🎙자유의 목소리 @voice_ofreedom]

야 언론들아 이제 평균 300명밖에 안 모인다고???

낮에 이 정도면 끝난 거에요^^(실시간)

허위사실 작작 유포합시다^^
JTBC처럼 되기 전에^^ 우리가 개돼지죠?

앞으로 저는 허위사실 유포하는 언론은 불매합니다😡😡😡

동참하실 분들은 반드시 하트 재게시 부탁드립니다. 또 진실을 알려주세요!!!!

국민을 개돼지로 아는 언론들 *참교육*합시다!!!

[Ava @real1RmConserve]

이 분들은 애국자입니다.

[🇰🇷인돌 @Yjjal33]

<6.21일 안동 첫 집회 현장>

WE GO TOGETHER
SAVE KOREA🇰🇷🇺🇸

-출처.대한사람1948-일부 영상

[Gordon G. Chang @GordonGChang]

From a friend in Korea, about A-WEB:

“I would like to bring to your attention an issue that I believe deserves far greater international scrutiny than it has received.

In January 2025, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol formally requested fact-finding regarding the Association of World Election Bodies (A-WEB), describing it as one of the alleged ‘hubs’ connected to election-related concerns.

This was an extraordinary act.

A sitting president does not casually identify an international organization headquartered in his own country as an election-related hub.

The President of the Republic of Korea is the nation's highest constitutional authority. He has access to intelligence briefings, classified security assessments, and information unavailable to ordinary citizens.

The obvious question is:
What did the President know, and why did he believe A-WEB warranted judicial inquiry?

Unfortunately, this question was never seriously explored.

The Constitutional Court rejected requests for additional fact-finding.

As a result, one of the most important questions in modern Korean political history remains unanswered.

This is particularly troubling because A-WEB is not a minor NGO or an academic forum.

A-WEB was designed during the Lee Myung-bak administration and formally launched during the Park Geun-hye administration as a global election-governance organization headquartered in Seoul.

Over time, it developed extensive connections across South Korea's political establishment, including figures from:
- ruling and opposition parties,
- election authorities,
- academia,
- the legal community,
- major media organizations,
- and business circles.

It became, in effect, a transnational election-governance network with deep domestic institutional support.

Its international activities deserve even closer attention.

A-WEB and projects associated with its ecosystem have repeatedly appeared in countries that later experienced:
- disputed election results,
- recounts,
- allegations of fraud,
- violent unrest,
- annulled elections,
- and institutional crises.

Examples include:
- Iraq,
- the Democratic Republic of Congo,
- Kyrgyzstan,
- and other countries where election technology and infrastructure projects became highly controversial.

Whether these controversies prove wrongdoing is a separate question.

The point is that a pattern of repeated international controversy exists.

Yet despite this record, there has never been a comprehensive independent investigation into why South Korea's sitting president considered A-WEB serious enough to identify as an election-related hub.

This raises broader concerns.

Election administration lies at the heart of national sovereignty.

When election governance becomes concentrated in transnational networks involving governments, international organizations, technology vendors, and unelected institutions, democratic accountability becomes increasingly difficult to maintain.

For many observers outside Korea, the central issue is no longer partisan politics.

It is this:
Why did the President of South Korea publicly raise concerns about A-WEB, and why was there no transparent and independent effort to determine whether those concerns had merit?

A democracy should not fear questions.

A democracy should fear the refusal to ask them.

Until these questions are fully examined, public confidence in both Korea's election governance system and the international networks surrounding it will remain under a cloud of uncertainty.

I hope this issue may be worthy of your attention and consideration, given its implications for election integrity, democratic accountability, and the growing influence of transnational governance networks.

Source:
Munhwa Ilbo, Jan. 22, 2025, reporting that President Yoon Suk-yeol requested fact-finding regarding A-WEB and identified it as an alleged election-related ‘hub.’
https://t.co/NKCY7uGRmm”

[gazago @mw9fsbv]

입틀막 곧 시작

[묵향(墨香)™🐬 @c584637]

채널A가 큰일을 하는구나🤣🤣🤣

[₿itcoin hodler⚡️ @morrisoi37]

6.25 참전 용사 어르신 맞이하는 아이들🇰🇷🇺🇸🫡

이게 맞지… ㅈ같은 중국 노래 말고….

자유 대한민국 지켜주신 어르신 여러분 감사합니다🙏🏻

[캡틴강 🇰🇷🇺🇲 @captinkang38]

경기도 안산 태극기내리고 짜장국기 달고 있습니다.

답답한게 자꾸 구호를 재선거로 통일하자고 하는데 이걸 보고도 그런 말이 나오십니까?

한미공조 국제수사 AWEB이 미국개입 전제조건이 되니까 그걸 덮으려는 의도아닙니까?

거기에 아무거나 외쳐도된다 성조기 왜드냐 재선거만 외치라고 분탕치면서 선동하시는데 아직도 멍청하게 ㅂㅈㅅㄱ를 단순히 선관위만 독단적으로 진행했다고 생각하고 계십니까?

지금이 진짜 마지막 기회라고 생각합니다. 정신들 차리십시요.

[Bithereum @nickdasugar]

주말 밤이라 훅 빠질 줄 알았다면 큰 오산.

민주화 운동, 이제 새벽반이 시작됐다. 🫡🇰🇷

[거제머스크 @sh27021]

분탕 치지 마라!!
왜?? 갈라치기 하세요??
재선거만 합시다!!

.. 하시는 분들에게..

제가 정말 하고 싶은 말이..
바로 이 말입니다.

여러분, 우리 이번에 이거..
못 파헤치면..
.
.
.
대한민국.. 끝장입니다..🇰🇷🙏
https://t.co/9chSNmYRT1

[제이🇰🇷🇺🇸🇰🇷🇺🇸 @jake__L_]

대구는

재선거다 부정선거다 어쩌고 말 나오면

구호를 그냥 "멸공" 으로 질러버림 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ

[카라시니 @air0208]

이건 잘 만들었다. . .

[FAFO👣 @leeyc5781]

🆘 [충격] 잠실 올공 대전차 기갑부대 등장...😎💤

🔜세계 최강 군단 👍 귀여우면 끝난거야🤣🤣

출처:메타시안

[Bithereum @nickdasugar]

오늘 올공에 역대급 인원이 모였습니다.

10, 20,30대 애국 청년들이 압도적으로 많네요. 🫡🇰🇷

[Bithereum @nickdasugar]

민주화 항쟁, 성공할 것 같습니다. 👍🫡🇰🇷

[사토시옹 🍔 @greenpark67]

비오는 날도 멈추지 않는다🇰🇷🚨🇰🇷🚨🇰🇷

[자유의 파수꾼 🇰🇷 🇺🇸 @ehlover19]

계엄군 때문에 죽을뻔 했다고 망상 소설 쓰는애들이.... 전방 병력 1/3로 줄이는건 괜찮고?!

[𝓡𝓞𝓚 𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝔂 𝓖𝓞𝓓 ✝️ @ROKmadebyGOD]

잊지말자 우성아파트 🇰🇷

[🎙자유의 목소리 @voice_ofreedom]

🚨전국 해병대 일어나게 생겼다!!!!!

전국각지 먼길에서 오셨습니다....ㄷㄷ..

해병대의 응원과 외침 전국민이 기억해야 할 것입니다. 이제 누구 차례인가요???

마지막에 기념 사진도 찍고 가시네요...그럴만하죠...🙏🙏🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷
(스레드에서 펌: inhans0)