Pablo

[Pablo @pablodmv]

@martinvars Básicamente es la legalización de la coima para ser ciudadano

[Pablo @pablodmv]

@JavierCaboUy Paraguay tiene menos carga tributaria y un iva del 10%. Cerrar ANCAP es el sueño húmedo de los blancos desde los 90...ese balde lleva 36 años puesto

[Federico Comesaña @fcomesana]

Está firmado el decreto que renueva el descuento de los 9 puntos de IVA. Con fecha de hoy. Un día después de que se venciera la última prórroga. Eso generó mucho revuelo por estos lados. Y es verdad, es bastante desprolijo pretender la continuidad de una exoneración fiscal con una reglamentación posterior al vencimiento de su expiración. Dicho esto, me aseguran desde el MEF que nadie dejó de recibir el beneficio porque tanto las Cámaras como las empresas responsables del cobro con tarjeta, estaban al tanto de que el beneficio iba a prorrogarse, lo cual desarticula especulaciones de "si pasa, pasa" o "esto era para dejar en off-side a la oposición". Otra perlita más del episodio que acabo de encontrar revisando decretos: si vamos al decreto que extendió del 30/9/2022 al 30/4/2023 este mismo beneficio, ¿saben en qué fecha se firmó? Cuatro días después del vencimiento. Lleva la firma de Luis Lacalle Pou y Azucena Arbeleche. Hablame de continuidad.

[Pablo @pablodmv]

@federicamph Quiero nombres

[Pablo @pablodmv]

Los del Partido Nacional piden allanamientos nocturnos porque de día siempre encuentran algun blanco #blancospillos

[OpenAI @OpenAI]

We’re sharing a solution to the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, one of the deepest problems at the frontier of mathematics.

The proof was produced by a group of agents, using an OpenAI next-generation model significantly more capable than GPT-6 Astra.

The problem concerns whether the description of smooth three-dimensional fluid motion modeled by the Navier-Stokes equations can break down. It has remained unresolved for roughly 90 years.

[Foo Fighters @foofighters]

Montevideo! 🇺🇾 Tickets are now on sale for Estadio Centenario!!! https://t.co/kfYx1XU6xq

Poster art by Martín Albornoz

[Pablo @pablodmv]

Claude Code ahora tiene mensajería entre sesiones: una sesión puede avisarle a otra cuando un cambio la afecta o pasarle una respuesta que la tenía trabada, sin copy-paste. 👉 https://t.co/APbhrkaJCQ

[Pablo @pablodmv]

Un diputado faltandole el respeto al Presidente llamandolo el "picaro de la hiundai". Comentarios que no colaboran a que la gente crea en los políticos si son ellos mismos los que fogonean la decadencia y la falta de respeto a las figuras de la democracia

[Gerardo Sotelo @Cybertario]

Operación Cardama: la derrota es total

Según Búsqueda, el pícaro de la Hyundai y sus dos secretarios, responsables de urdir y ejecutar la Operación Cardama, quieren citar a la comisión investigadora al expresidente Lacalle Pou.
En un año y medio al frente del Estado, a nueve meses de largar la operación y después de cinco meses de investigación parlamentaria, no sólo debieron reconocer que no hubo hechos de corrupción ni ilegalidades, sino que no pueden demostrar que el ruinoso negocio de la rescisión en el que metieron al país, tuviera más motivación que la política barata.
Derrotados y acorralados, huyen para adelante: ahora quieren citar a la comisión a quien los va a derrotar en 2029, para ver si pueden ensuciar la cancha y, por lo menos, acortar distancias.
No se recuerda tanta incapacidad e irresponsabilidad desde la restauración democrática.

[Pablo @pablodmv]

@BreakPointMP Nadie habla que para tener 46 años esta hecho mierda

[Pablo @pablodmv]

Here is an openai executive shitting his pants because open-weight models are coming for Occidental speculative companies

[Dean W. Ball @deanwball]

Some observations on Kimi:

1. It's a very good model! I don't think its performance can be explained away by distillation or anything like that. In agentic coding sessions, it seems pretty much on par with the best public models of Q1 2026. In my fairly limited use, it also seemed very token hungry. It's not obvious to me that this model is actually that cheap to run.

2. I am personally surprised the Chinese state continues to allow the open sourcing of models this good, given potential risks. To be clear, I *myself* might be fine with models presenting this level of marginal risk being open weight, but I am surprised that China is fine with it. I suspect the reason they are is 75% explained by strategic blindness/lack of AGI-pilledness (the CCP is very Yann Lecun-y in its views of AI). The other 25% or so is their lack of compute for customer inference (making China's open-weight strategy an unintended byproduct of US export controls) and the normal Chinese strategy of aggressive exports. For the companies, as opposed to the government, the decision to open source is partially ideological and partially because they are behind, and they know that very few people would pay for sub-frontier models from China.

3. Open-weight models are inherently decelerationist, and I'm continually surprised to see the so-called "accelerationists" so excited about open-weight models. I suspect the reason they are is that they know open-weight models are effectively ungovernable, and they simply like the overall cloak of ungovernability open-weight models create over the whole of AI. It's not a bad strategy; it reminds me of James Scott's recounting of the hill people in "the art of not being governed." Still, in the end, open-weight models deter further AI capex.

4. One probable outcome of an open-weight-model-dominant world is full AI communism, which is precisely what China proposes: rather than a market product, AI is a "public good" which will ultimately be provided by the state as a kind of "digital public infrastructure." This future strikes me as a dystopian hellscape, but I've never met an open-weight models advocate who doesn't ultimately concede this is where things end. You'd be surprised how many 'accelerationists' lobbied me, while I was in government, to support an eleven or twelve-figure federally funded data center so that startups could train models at a subsidy and then give them away for free. There was no other way for AI to progress, they said. Perhaps this is the logical end state of things. Nonetheless, I find myself surprised to see supposed accelerationists excited about such an outcome. I think many of them just don't know what they're doing. Many accelerationists do not view the creation and serving of frontier models as a legitimate business.

5. I would guess that the Trump Administration will at some point realize that their best strategy here would be to create large amounts of regulatory risk around the use of open-weight Chinese models. You don't need to "ban open source" (one of the dumber motifs of AI policy discussion). You just need to direct every agency to issue soft law that creates FUD. "A Federal Reserve Advisory Bulletin found that there may be backdoors in Chinese AI models." It needn't be that well justified. You just create enough regulatory risk that every regulated enterprise backs off. You probably don't want to create so much regulatory risk that you scare off the hyperscalers from serving Chinese models; this will just drive startups to sketchier providers. There's a happy middle ground here. I'd assume they will do some version of this.

6. It's probably true that open-weight models of this capability make the world a bit more dangerous, but not so much more that you'll really notice. At some point the models will be capable enough that you will notice. "A nonliving, invisible, dangerous, and infinitely self-replicating agent escaped from a Chinese lab," you say? Color me shocked.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Tesla now in Uruguay

[ClaudeDevs @ClaudeDevs]

Boris sat down with Spotify VP of Engineering Niklas Gustavsson.

Spotify ships 4,500 production deploys a day, and 73% of PRs are now AI-assisted.

[Pablo @pablodmv]

Y pensar que muchos de los que lloran ahora porque Uruguay quedó eliminado, pedían que se fuera el maestro tabarez.

[Pablo @pablodmv]

@PhDenLogica Fuente: la de los deseos

[Satya Nadella @satyanadella]

https://t.co/vLmiBKTtX3

[Pablo @pablodmv]

Le pregunté Fable 5 cómo se definiría si yo no supiera nada de ella. Respuesta: “Soy lo que pasa cuando todo lo que ustedes escribieron aprende a contestar.”
La conversación terminó siendo menos sobre IA y más sobre humanidad, memoria y existencia
https://t.co/M5FUjr3Vf8

[Andrej Karpathy @karpathy]

This is a super exciting release - Claude Fable 5 is the same underlying model as Mythos but with added safeguards. The benchmarks are great and it's SOTA on everything by a margin but I'll add that *qualitatively* also, this is a major-version-bump-deserving step change forward (imo of the same order as Claude 4.5 was in November), peaking especially for long problem-solving sessions on very difficult problems. You can give it a lot more ambitious tasks than what you're used to, the model "gets it" and it will just go, and it's never felt this tempting to stop looking at the code at all (but don't do this in prod!). The model still has quirks that people will run into and the safeguards are configured to be a little too trigger happy for launch, which can hopefully be tuned over time.

I feel a lot of things changing as working software increasingly comes out on a tap. The Jevon's paradox kicks in and I feel my own demand for software growing substantially. You can ask for anything - explainers, visualizers, dashboards, bespoke single-use apps (e.g. a full wandb that is hyper-specific just for your project), you can 10X your test suite, auto-optimize code, run giant research projects with custom HTML for the results, anything! "Free your mind" (Matrix ref). Really looking forward to all the things people build!

[ClaudeDevs @ClaudeDevs]

Claude Fable 5 is our first generally available Mythos-class model.

It ships with new safety classifiers that may flag certain prompts in dual-use domains like cyber and bio.

We've added fallbacks: a refused request retries on Claude Opus 4.8 instead of dead-ending.