I'm getting bored of being governed by successive venal narcissistic dribblers. People who think it is better to index benefits than tax allowances, that undocumented young men are more deserving of State spending than our armed forces. Who think the greatest crime is to notice that different cultures have different values and all fall some way short of the English. That there is an optimal number of bats, which we have exceeded and they dont need fucking tunnels.
American immigration enforcement agencies are currently deporting 35,000-40,000 illegal migrants EVERY MONTH.
They deported 442,000 in the year 2025 alone.
The BBC is outraged by this. But I think many British people would like to see the same. Don’t you?
Here are three seemingly separate stories you might have missed in the last week in the UK that, taken together, reveal something far more profound.
First, it's emerged that pro-immigration campaigners helped place and prepare illegal migrants in the audience on the BBC flagship debate programme, Question Time, to “test” pro-migration messages in front of the British people.
Second, it’s been revealed that a writer who helped craft storylines on the popular BBC primetime soap Eastenders is a “migration and racial justice” activist who works on “changing people’s views” through popular culture.
And third, it’s been revealed that the family of Rhiannon Whyte — a young mother who was stabbed to death by an illegal migrant from Sudan — was guided by state officials to “tone down” their statement after Rhiannon’s murder, because of fears it might cause unrest among the wider population.
Three seemingly different stories that involve three different institutions – the BBC, the creative industry, and the British state. What do they all have in common?
They all reflect the Narrative State -- a state that no longer sees its main role as being to describe reality but present a warped version of reality that reflects and reinforces its dominant ideology.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
Are Labour MPs so lacking in intellectual curiosity they are just going to crown Burnham leader without asking any questions as to how he will govern? Just different vibes. This is the only time you have leverage over the executive and you just lie there having your gunts tickled.
The next PM is excited to harness the energy of @garyseconomics’s mob.
This will mean the UK will become the next failed experiment on wealth taxes.
How can I be so sure that wealth taxes won’t work? Let me count the ways they will be a disaster…
- the UK is already the highest taxed place to be a top earner or wealthy. More taxes at the top will push more away than it collects.
- The engine room of the economy is digital assets that can based anywhere. The only wealth that will be taxed is old money fortunes tied up in real estate… the new fortunes will leave the anti-wealth UK.
- wealth is highly subjective. It’s never a clean number like income or an actual sale. Wealth is a forecast, a projection, a useful guess. Hence it can be litigated and debated - and it will. Wealth taxes tie up the courts.
- it’s not being introduced because it works, it’s being introduced because people are angry. Mostly they are angry at Elon, Jeff, Mark and Larry… all the American Billionaires who will be buying up deflated UK assets after wealth taxes set fire to their valuations. The mob wants blood that is out of reach.
- there’s not that much to tax. The UKs billionaires are already leaving. The total wealth held by billionaires in the UK is sub £700B (less than Elon’s wealth). There’’s only technically 150 of them remaining and most have already started to leave. I’d be amazed if the tax collects more than a few billion.
- this tax is going to end up destroying the middle class. Mark my words… when the rich leave the middle class have to cover the gap that they leave behind. One way that will happen is that they will use the wealth tax framework to tax nice family homes, mind sized businesses, decent sized pension pots. It will be a race to the bottom.
- Wealth taxes have been tried 15 times and tolled back 12. The only places that have wealth taxes don’t have IHT or CGT. Wealthy people pay less than they otherwise would have. It’s a wealth tax in name only. The UK has wealth taxes now in practice (School VAT, IHT, Stamp Duty,etc) but not in name.
Anyway, if it is the will of the people then so be it. I will be advising entrepreneurs to look elsewhere though - it simply doesn’t make sense to build something of value in a country that despises value creation.
I would sooner live in poverty than see my children grow up as a minority in their own homeland.
Not that we would need to, by the way, as reversing mass immigration would be nothing but a good thing for Britain’s economy.
It genuinely amused me that people think replacing Starmer will make things better.
From Boris Johnson's election onwards, we've been shuffling the bollards on the Titanic.
You have to actually change direction if you want to avoid crashing into the iceberg:
- End Net Zero
- Make business viable again
- Get welfare under control
- Fund defence
- Ensure equality under the law
- Arrest criminals and keep them in jail
- Deport illegal immigrants and close the border
- Bring the civil service to heel
Burnham will become as unpopular as Starmer within months since he isn't going to do any of that.
Those scumbags who subjected a 13-month-old baby boy in their care to physical, sexual and emotional abuse during the final four months of his life should be put to death.
A child sexually abused and murdered.
Dying after facing months of physical and sexual abuse from grown men.
With the British people's approval, a Restore Britain Government would put them to death.
Why keep these men alive? For what end? Costing tens of thousands of pounds a year? Who benefits?
They tortured a baby.
There is no redemption, there can never be redemption.
End them.
I’m fighting for a western civilization where none of them had to die.
We’re not fighting red vs. blue.
We’re fighting good vs. evil.
Darkness vs. light.
We must win.
The Rape Gang Inquiry - what happens next.
I intend to use my parliamentary privilege to name perpetrators and their enablers in the chamber.
This will be done incredibly carefully with our legal team involved every step of the way to ensure that no future prosecutions are jeopardised.
We are cooperating with the authorities in order to help cases be opened and reopened, but my faith in the system to independently deliver justice is not high...
That is why we are pursuing private prosecutions and civil litigation.
A target list has been identified, and it continues to grow.
This all has to be handled very carefully, for obvious reasons, but I am determined to act. We have had enough talk, now we need to act.
Our aim is straightforward.
Put people in prison. Deliver justice. Finally.
We will act. Not talk.
The ban on social media for children under 16 is an idea that has merits. But the way it is being done is simply a way to force everyone, including adults, to identify themselves online, creating the most powerful surveillance and censorship architecture in human history.
Someone who founded PayPal, built a car company and sends rockets into space becoming a trillionaire isn’t weird. Public servants making $174k becoming millionaires is.
Change my mind.
If a Somalian family is living in British social housing, claiming benefits, refusing to work, not even able to speak English?
A Restore Britain Government will deport that family.
No apologies, no compromises, no payments.
Deported.
This all seems to be a ploy to link IP addresses and online activity directly to an identifiable person to make them easier to catch and track down. The government falsely assumed that everyone watches porn and they thought they would get everyone that way. It obviously did not work as well as they were hoping so they are now expanding it. (I have always said that initial laws are just a foot in the door, those laws will always be expanding after the fact into their true original intended purpose).
So their plan now is if you want to use any social media or much of the internet in any way, you will need to prove that you are over 18 which means submitting an ID. This will require far far more ID submissions which will massively expand the government database, which was the real plan all along, not the safety of children.
The funniest thing about this is after all the fuss about the Online Safety Act, this blanket ban on kids using social media pretty much renders the entire act pointless and made it a giant waste of time. Which to be honest, proves that the act was never about protecting children but was really about building a giant database that links all online activity directly to a person.
This database would then be constantly poured over by AI to flag "citizens of concern" to the government who may be potential political dissidents, saying naughty anti-government things etc so the government can pre-emptively act against them.
Minority Report. This is literally the plot of Minority Report.