Call it whatever you want, but this is what a losing invasion looks like in real life.
I have spent years in Ukraine, on training grounds, near the front, and inside the system. If Russia were winning, this war would not look like this in year four.
They would not still be grinding forward meters at a time. They would not be burning through equipment from the Soviet stockpile, pulling out T-62s and T-55s, and fielding poorly trained replacements to fill gaps left by massive casualties.
Armies that are winning do not mobilize repeatedly, empty prisons, or trade tens of thousands of lives for small pieces of ground.
Your Iraq comparison is exactly right. If the United States had invaded Iraq, lost hundreds of thousands of troops, failed to secure the country after years of fighting, and only controlled a fraction of the terrain, no serious person would call that victory. They would call it a strategic failure. The same standard applies here.
Ukraine is still fighting. It's command structure still functions. Its society is still intact. It's military is adapting faster than Russia is. Russia is not advancing because it is strong. It is advancing because it is willing to spend lives at a rate no professional military would accept. That is not winning. That is attrition without an exit.
Anyone calling this a Russian victory has never planned operations, never trained soldiers for combat, and never watched what a real winning campaign looks like.
This war has exposed Russian weakness, not strength, and it has done so in front of the entire world.
Slava Ukraini. Heroiam Slava. 🇺🇦
@Gerashchenko_en Hi, I'm from Hungary. The answer is yes and no. Yes: independent media has reported the attacks, and no: state media and outlets under the government's control have not
Elég volt abból, hogy mások döntenek helyettünk! 🛑
Most itt a lehetőség, hogy mindannyian beleszóljunk. Töltsd ki online a Nemzet Hangját, és mondd el a véleményed! https://t.co/B0tqso7jjW
Elég volt abból, hogy mások döntenek helyettünk! 🛑
Most itt a lehetőség, hogy mindannyian beleszóljunk. Töltsd ki online a Nemzet Hangját, és mondd el a véleményed! https://t.co/B0tqso7jjW
Elég volt abból, hogy mások döntenek helyettünk! 🛑
Most itt a lehetőség, hogy mindannyian beleszóljunk. Töltsd ki online a Nemzet Hangját, és mondd el a véleményed! https://t.co/B0tqso7jjW
Elég volt abból, hogy mások döntenek helyettünk! 🛑
Most itt a lehetőség, hogy mindannyian belesz��ljunk. Töltsd ki online a Nemzet Hangját, és mondd el a véleményed! https://t.co/8NRWVoPc95
Chinese AI Model DeepSeq: Despite U.S. sanctions restricting access to Nvidia AI chips, Chinese researchers developed DeepSeq, an AI model reportedly more powerful than OpenAI’s.
Overcoming Hardware Limitations: With only a limited supply of Nvidia chips, Chinese engineers achieved groundbreaking efficiency optimizations, reducing training resource requirements to just 1/100th of what OpenAI, Microsoft, or Google typically use.
Open-Sourcing the Innovation: In a bold move, the developers open-sourced their AI models, making both the code and methodology freely available to the public, significantly reducing the competitive edge of proprietary models like OpenAI’s.
Impact on AI Industry: The release of high-quality free alternatives disrupts the market, potentially devaluing OpenAI’s models and forcing American AI companies to rethink their strategies.
China’s Rapid AI Innovation: The success of DeepSeq underscores China’s growing self-sufficiency in AI and its ability to leapfrog hardware limitations through advanced software and algorithmic breakthroughs.
"Sokan vannak, akik őszintén szeretnének javítani azon, ahogy ez az orsz... https://t.co/G7SnezhHlJ via @YouTube @Léderer_Sándor a K-Monitor tevékenységéről.
Elon Musk has been backing neo-Nazi parties around the world, interfering in elections and using his massive platform to attack anyone who doesn’t share his extreme right-wing views.