Two clear issues with this clip.
She misses horror’s tragic essence. The horror story doesn’t necessarily glorify darkness, when at its proper, it confronts us with evil, suffering, and mortality, deepening our understanding of the human plight. This cultivates fortitude in combating the evil or warns us against man’s undoing when choosing the evil.
Her rhetorical approach is dogmatic, not explorational. Rather than asking what horror reveals about human nature, she begins with a verdict. Prudence requires consideration with our engagement of stories, of course, but her posture here disqualifies any type of dialogue to the contrary.
To your point, there is a difference between depiction and celebration. This is 101 with all art.
Depiction demonstrates the reality of the tragedy, with weight and seriousness.
Celebration in horror strives to create shock by finding new ways to mutate the human condition. The Saw movies are a clear example of this.
Of course there are many horror films that we should abstain from in the spirit of rejecting the celebration of the mutated. As we should in any genre that endorses an upside view of reality.
Something to consider, at its core, horror is a form of tragedy. It centers on the presence of evil, the corruption of what is good, the violation of the natural order, and often the downfall of the human person.
The question is not simply whether a film depicts darkness, but whether it invites us to weigh evil with moral seriousness or to delight in it as entertainment. There is a profound difference between confronting darkness to understand the gravity of evil and celebrating darkness for its own sake.
Yes, as Dostoevsky said, “Beauty will save the world” However, sometimes a soul requires tragedy first to awaken its sensibilities to the poisons of vice. Then the beauty of virtue becomes more clear.
I don’t understand why this is controversial. This is just common sense.
Horror films typically are glorifying darkness and the demonic. Of course we should not be a fan of that.