Preben Hansen

[Preben Hansen @pchrhans22546]

Tyske tropper befinder sig stadig i Polen og bistår på vegne af eu med kupforsøg!

[NFS 🇩🇰 @NFShne]

Den polske premierminister Donald Tusk indrømmer nu åbenlyst at han har indhentet hjælp fra Tyskland i et kup mod sit eget land. Det er verdenshistorie der skrives.

En statsleder i EU får bistand fra kanzler Merz til at sætte forfatningsdomstolen ud af kraft for at ændre sit eget lands grundlov. Alt er afklapset med Bruxelles for at knægte Polen der modsætter sig den gældende dagsorden bl.a om migration.

EU er ikke kun på kanten af sin jurisdiktion. EU bryder enhver folkeret. Det er en krigserklæring.

[Preben Hansen @pchrhans22546]

@TheRealTomKrus Danmark har doneret mere end 90.000.000.000kr og vi er lidt under 6 mio sjæle, altså over 15.000kr pr indbygger. Dvs 60.000kr pr dansk familie med far, mor og to børn. Eller 120.000kr, hvis vi regner bedsteforældrene med. Så nej, vi taler ikke om 82kr,

[Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll]

When I first posted the 15% Band, I compared Republicans vs. Democrats, so it covered 30 Senate races.

Now that results are nearly final, I updated it to include every vote: Republicans, Democrats, independents, third parties, everyone, in all 35 Senate races. Then I ran a new regression analysis. Once again, the number came back .85.

34 of 35 Senate Republicans fell below President Trump's 2024 share. Red states and blue states lost the same proportion.

In some states the lost votes went to Democrats. In others, like Idaho, Nebraska and Montana, they went to independents. Different opponents, different places for the votes to go, and the Republican share still landed at about 85%.

This isn't just an average. An average can hide states scattered all over the place. A regression tests whether one rule fits every state.

Here, it does: Trump's 2024 share × .85 lands close to the Republican result state after state after state, and explains 87% of the differences between them (R² = .87).

Five nights ago, I was pretty sure. Tonight, I know.

This is real. It deserves an answer.

[Preben Hansen @pchrhans22546]

@carstenbreum Danmark ville i stedet kunne have bygget motorvejsforbindelse mellem Jylland og Sjælland via Samsø for de milliarder, der i alt er doneret. Men i stedet har regeringen valgt død og ødelæggelse (over en million mennesker er døde (kun til nytte for våbenproducenternes intressenter)

[Preben Hansen @pchrhans22546]

@Kimtruth4 For få år siden stemte vi om afskaffelse af Danmarks eu-forsvarsforbehold. Dette fordi danske politikere blot ønskede at deltage i møderne og derved holde os orienteret.
Nu misbruger regeringen danskernes tillidserklæring og går nu forrest i finansieringen af krig mod Rusland.

[Preben Hansen @pchrhans22546]

@SchaldemoseMEP Når børnehaven holder forældremøde bliver børnene meget sjældent inviteret med. Samme princip gælder vel her? Efter VV1 blev Tyskland ikke inviteret med. Hvis krigen fortsætter bliver Ukraine jo nok heller ikke inviteret med.

[Preben Hansen @pchrhans22546]

@CommonSenseASAP Attentatforsøg mod præsidenten og mord på tilskuer i Butler PA, har FBI og lokal politi ligeledes slettet og eller fjernet bevismateriale.

[Preben Hansen @pchrhans22546]

@mejlhedetv2 Midtvejsvalget I 2026 var tydeligvis organiseret til at blive "too rigged to fix". Men forthåbentlig vil det denne gang lykkes at få anholdt både bagmænd og operatører og få dem dømt.

[Catturd ™ @catturd2]

There's a better chance of you playing golf and having a hole-in-one on every hole, than this to be true.

[Dotsthoughts @DorothyStangle]

TRUMP DROPS THE HAMMER: DEMS INVENTED MILLIONS OF VOTERS OUT OF THIN AIR IN 2026
President Trump just broke his silence on the midterm numbers, and the data he is amplifying is impossible to ignore. Republican House candidates put up a solid, normal midterm performance. They matched or slightly improved on 2022 totals, landing around 55.6 million votes nationwide. Democrats, meanwhile, somehow exploded from 51.3 million in 2022 to a projected 70.4 million. That is nearly 20 million brand-new votes that appeared from nowhere.
In Texas the picture is even more absurd. Greg Abbott beat his own strong 2022 performance by 100,000 votes and set a record for any Republican gubernatorial candidate in state history. His Democratic opponent, Gina Hinojosa, gained 1.7 million more votes than Beto O’Rourke received just four years earlier. She pulled more votes in Texas than Kamala Harris did in the 2024 presidential race and is already past Joe Biden’s 2020 total. No poll predicted anything close. Turnout lines should have been around the block. They were not.
Republicans did not stay home in large numbers and switch sides. Their vote totals look like every other midterm cycle. The Democratic surge is the outlier, larger than anything seen in a presidential year. That does not happen by accident. Trump has stayed quiet for days after the election. Now he is circulating these exact charts and calling the Democratic numbers “Looney Tunes.” The pattern is familiar. He is laying the groundwork. The question is no longer whether the totals look fraudulent. It is how long the people who produced them will keep pretending the numbers are normal.

[Deep Leaks @DeepLeaksHQ]

The UN has publicly announced that climate change never existed!!

Solar power generation was just about vested interests. All man-made!!

That's the whole story!!!
🐸

[aly @anette_aly]

Stadig ikke et ord i danske medier, fra @SSI_dk politikere eller læger.
@berlingske @btdk @jyllandsposten @EkstraBladet @politiken
Besynderligt, at man sådan, i samlet flok, lyver for danskerne.

[Kari Lake @KariLake]

No way in hell.

Iowa did not vote for communism because of gas prices (that were the same or less than under previous admin) or a war to end a nuclear threat (w/ no boots on the ground).

I know Iowa.
Iowa raised me.
Iowa educated me.

The math isn’t mathing here.
Let’s audit this election to make sure the results are honest before we hand over the Hawkeye state and America to Communists.

Do not certify until you VERIFY the vote.

[Breener Meeker @MeekerBreener]

@gatewaypundit @packingpatriot_ It’s eerily similar to the not shit was done about it in 2020

[David J Harris Jr @DavidJHarrisJr]

🚨Look at the numbers from this midterm and tell me how this makes any sense.

🔴Republicans: Went from 54.2 million in 2022 to 55.6 million in 2026—a modest net increase of 1.4 million votes.

🔵Democrats: Jumped from 51.3 million in 2022 to roughly 70 million in 2026—an astronomical net increase of 19 million votes in a midterm election.

When 19 million more Democrats suddenly show up out of nowhere while Republican turnout remains steady, it defies reality.

When can we stop calling this a "blue tsunami" and start calling it fraud?

[Lisa Mei Crowley @TheNotoriousLMC]

They can't be THIS stupid...can they?

Or were [they] told to make the steal BLATANTLY obvious?

Drop 24:
For the betterment of the country not all will be prosecuted and all will do as told.

Drop 4461:
Only when evil is forced into the light can we defeat it.
Only when they can no longer operate in the [shadows] can people see the truth for themselves.
Only when people see the truth [for themselves] will people understand the true nature of their deception.
Seeing is Believing.
Sometimes you can't tell the public the truth.
YOU MUST SHOW THEM.
ONLY THEN WILL PEOPLE FIND THE WILL TO CHANGE.
It had to be this way.

[Preben Hansen @pchrhans22546]

@DrFrankModels https://t.co/lchLwZ8aUZ

[Insomnus @nighttimemedia]

Speaking as a computer scientist...

Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.

This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.

At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.

Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.

[👑G👑 @3mrwellington3]

Yeah if Putin goes, it's the Scramble for Africa part deux...

[Preben Hansen @pchrhans22546]

Regan om Demokraterne. “…freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp.” https://t.co/fX0IQUTYHm via @YouTube

[Preben Hansen @pchrhans22546]

Just a programming error hard to fix now. Overall the program may have rigged the election to big to fix

[The SCIF @TheSCIF]

UNBELIEVEABLE! Democrat candidate Ericka Lomick DROPPED OUT and suspended her campaign a full month before people even started voting, but somehow SHE WON her election?

What kind of ELECTION FRAUD is going on here? This is BEYOND ridiculous and people are tired of it.