Thank you @spamhaus for ignoring our emails and requests for over a month and closing our tickets without giving us any helpful response, wrongly listing subnets, and yet having time to pressure our partners to stop working with us because of your unreasonable listings. 1/6
@ClashPlayer_@spamhaus Abuseipdb is not a reliable source for abuse reports. Not only can anyone create an account and post what they want, most of the reports I was able to see are for port 80... Accessing a webserver is not abuse.
@Gi7w0rm@spamhaus@neterranet Check the URLHaus feed please. Every single IP is offline/terminated and its also displayed as "offline" on URLHaus.
From what i can see on Greynoise, most of the IPs are Tor Nodes. The site will also not display more information without payment.
@spamhaus@neterranet We urge @spamhaus to engage in transparent communication and resolve these issues fairly, instead of damaging our business and reputation without justification. 6/6
@spamhaus@neterranet At this point we are wondering if they are just considering any domain pointing to our infrastructure as malicious, as their reports also contained our nameservers ns1 and https://t.co/jeHuFXBPVv. We are not alone with such issues. 5/6
@LemonHaze420_ What is the point of your post then? Obviously we will take down any malware that is reported properly (via URLHaus or email), it looks like you are just trying to display us in a bad light.
@banthisguy9349 There is no connection between the domain you mentioned and the IP 193.35.18.142. The domain used this ip previously, which is no longer the case.