Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account)

@phdskat.org at bsky

Political economist, @CBScph | International tax, green accounting, professionals and expertise

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

🚨 New paper out!

Excited to share this, where I take a 'weaponized interdependence' view at explaining historical failure and recent success in global tax policy - and how that view can help fight climate change and inequality🧵👇

#OA @Global_Policy:

https://t.co/FSry1V1A5L

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

Jeg har snakket med @MadsOlrik om hvad Trump (ikke) kommer til at betyde for det globale (skatte)samarbejde.

Læs med, hvis du er til den optimistiske side - og hvis du ikke er!

https://t.co/MQbzExahb5

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

Glad to have contributed to today’s @FT on the threat of global tax war under Trump II:

https://t.co/qCCBfwN88i

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

Glad to have contributed to today’s @FT on the threat of global tax war under Trump II:

https://t.co/qCCBfwN88i

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

Efter Sanjay Shah-dommen, og fordi jeg har "udtalt mig kritisk" om udbytteskat-systemet, har jeg fået en masse spørgsmål om hvad man så burde gøre i stedet. Det svarede jeg på for to år siden, her:

https://t.co/Xeis5yNBv8

[Dan Neidle @DanNeidle]

Fascinating paper on how network effects may be the key to changing international tax policy:

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

Well, I did a thing. Link dead. Here's the right one:
https://t.co/4oB1cScKpT

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

Why did research on 'corporate escape' fade in the 1980s–90s, just as profit shifting and tax haven use surged?

With unique data, @mattiylonen and I argue losing trans-disciplinary knowledge and supportive institutions had severe consequences.

🧵👇

#OA: https://t.co/ZJEvJvsFU7

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

I've authored today's op-ed in Danish business newspaper Børsen, calling for calm among the doomsayers who believe Trump will inevitably kill the global minimum tax:

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

For the non-Danish readers, it's basically a slightly more elaborated version of this thread:

https://t.co/FcAJAOBv8h

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

Couple of research-informed reasons why, structurally, it might not be as easy as some tax observers think for Trump II to impose his will on global tax policy: 🧵👇

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

I've authored today's op-ed in Danish business newspaper Børsen, calling for calm among the doomsayers who believe Trump will inevitably kill the global minimum tax:

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

@danieldbunn I've inadvertently galaxy brained it. They supress posts with links too, so.. yeh!

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

Well, I did a thing. Link dead. Here's the right one:
https://t.co/4oB1cScKpT

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

Why did research on 'corporate escape' fade in the 1980s–90s, just as profit shifting and tax haven use surged?

With unique data, @mattiylonen and I argue losing trans-disciplinary knowledge and supportive institutions had severe consequences.

🧵👇

#OA: https://t.co/ZJEvJvsFU7

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

It was an absolute joy to work on this; I'm so glad it's out.

Tons of people to thank, and many have been already, but for me, most of all my brilliant co-author @mattiylonen, who is truly the brains (and the brawn) behind this paper. /ends

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

Why did research on 'corporate escape' fade in the 1980s–90s, just as profit shifting and tax haven use surged?

With unique data, @mattiylonen and I argue losing trans-disciplinary knowledge and supportive institutions had severe consequences.

🧵👇

#OA: https://t.co/ZJEvJvsFU7

[Rasmus Corlin Christensen (ghost account) @phdskat]

Our narrative (a goldmine of quirky historical bits) informs disciplinary history, re-introduces MNEs as study objects, and warns of the risks of 'forgetting' pioneering research on critical topics such as corporate power and inequality.

Full paper: https://t.co/fp4ykvd4JJ