@NateSilver538 So from getting a program to meet its specs, we need to graduate to learning what specs we should want it to meet. It sounds to me like being promoted to a boss, but I've never been a boss and I'm not sure bosses of programmers are good at learning- what- to- ask- for.
Mammals and birds, then apes, evolved sociability. How close together were the human invention of tools and of language? But with writing, humans became server pods for sociability's evolution: trade, cities, money, long-distance trade, mass comm, computers, internet and AI.
@deanwball "A bit more dangerous, but not so much more that you'll really notice."-- so... lemming in a slowly-warming pan of water off a cliff commentary.
@way_opener@owlshapedheart Have been using standard bankers' boxes on NSF shelving. There are literature-mailing boxes that fit six to a bankers' box... for *sub-categories*! Standardizing on a certain "72-quart" translucent bin bc (my sister points out) they stack without shelves. All with LABELS.
@paulg Once as teenagers a friend and I were planning a trip to the city. My friend said "Make sure not to look up at the tall buildings or you'll be spotted as a mark."
@timhwang oh you mean our legal systems, not like one of Asimov's or Peter's or thermodynamics' Laws... But to your point, I'd say Law (especially statute rather than common) imposes on us more literally than technology does. Tech hands us, what, Faustian bargains.
LLMs have low-level structure roughly like brains, and behavior roughly like humans'. We have working mockups of that old dream; we can be concerned where that'll take us, but we can't call it implausible on its face any more.