algo, find me some designer who are amazing at what they do but are even great with communication (they over communicate!)
go find them!
looking to add a new "designer" to the baked team
As a VC, Fable is better than me at VC work.
It breaks down white papers better than I do. It's better at financial analysis. It chews through mountains of diligence in minutes. There is no single well-scoped intellectual task where I beat a frontier AI. I catch its mistakes sometimes, but it catches mine more often.
If my job is "VC work," then Fable is better than me at my job.
But Fable alone would be a mediocre investor.
It would quickly pass on all the bunk, sure. But among the set of doable deals, it can't find the one with the je ne sais quoi. It doesn't have the bias toward special people, wild ideas, or risk-taking. Its tweets and thinkpieces are OK, but they're too safe, too obvious. I can prompt it in the right direction, but even then it's not quite right. It's too suggestible. It changes its mind too easily. It's not stubborn, self-assured, irrationally confident about how the future will play out, the way great investors are.
But me + Fable is really good. Better than either of us alone. In fact every investor on our team has leveled up with AI in the same way. We all feel we have more to do now, not less. We feel more capable, not less.
My theory is that AI disempowers service providers and empowers owners. If you sell your labor by the task, AI is genuinely terrifying. It can accomplish that task cheaper, faster, with more control and less bullshit. But if you own the outcome, if you're using AI to do something for you, then AI is amazing. It's empowering, not disempowering. Make your own logo, design your own website, write your own copy, build your own systems.
It also means is that you should aim to reorganize yourself in the food chain. If you don't, AI will do it for you. Don't be a service provider, be an owner. If you're building something, you are a beneficiary of AI, all of the incredible gains that AI is enabling will accrue to you too.
But if you're a tax on people building things, just know that the tax rate on building is rapidly going to 0.
Hi, I'm Andrejs @andkorss — Product Designer at Relate 👋
I design interfaces & web products, present work to clients, and mentor junior designers. AI is a big part of my workflow — automating routine tasks, analyzing briefs, generating ideas, and building web animations.
For animations, I use Claude. I build in Webflow, but I'm not deep into GSAP or Three.js — so Claude helps me vibe-code the parts I can't build myself. For example, on a recent project, we used AI to create a set of interactive illustrations and built them right into the website.
Here's a quick walkthrough on a live project ↓
Curious to hear why would you use Webflow or any other site builder today? Isn’t it easier to ship stuff directly empowered with LLMs? Easier to maintain for most clients since they often have in-house front-end or can also setup a workflow of pushing changes though a chatbot interface.
Site builders seem like an unnecessary intermediary to me. But I’m curious to hear your opinion.
Hey, it's Anita @aaatsiklauri 👋
I'm the Branding Lead at Relate — I run the processes in our brand team, mentor junior designers on the visual side, and still do hands-on branding work myself. Today I'm giving you an inside look at Relate's culture.
Think we'd be a good fit? Browse open roles and apply here → https://t.co/KDezHmFsax
Drop your portfolio in the replies to speed things up. Follow us so we can DM you.