pablo

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@TitanEmail somehow it was easier able to track a network of scammers running a large scale phishing campaign currently using your platform, than finding the right place to report it within your documentation and support portal.

[vx-underground @vxunderground]

Our deepest condolences to the friends, family, and colleagues of Mr. Kevin Mitnick.

https://t.co/UPeddvYNyw

[vx-underground @vxunderground]

The most sophisticated Threat Intelligence team on the planet is the Nintendo Corporation Intellectual Property Legal Team.

If ransomware groups used a Super Smash Bros logo they'd be caught in 48 hours.

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@reachvaldo 🚀

[DuckDegen is for hire 🛡️ @DuckDegen]

I'm excited to share that after six months of hard work, we have built what we believe to be the ultimate job aggregator for the crypto industry. Our web application, JobStash, is now live and available at https://t.co/odGCh2tvc6.

[Andriy Mulyar @andriy_mulyar]

Huge update on open source LLMz 💥

The Falcon model is now completely open source. Previously it was released under a license that required commercial royalty payments.
https://t.co/A9rcMfRRg6

[CryptoCanal - Common S3nse @CryptoCanal]

And #ETHDam is off with @alex_pertsev 🌪️

[CryptoCanal - Common S3nse @CryptoCanal]

Kickstarting #ETHDam by jumping straight into the deep end with this 30 min panel discussion on privacy, with @ameensol founder of @SpankChain, @parazyd founder of @DarkFiSquad and @nicksvyaznoy a privacy researcher at @nymproject and Web3privacy now 🚀 Moderated by @blockblanc

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@alinalatinina Don’t pick on the magician. Easy target.

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@alinalatinina @CryptoCanal Best. Afterparty. Ever.

[pablo @pnavarro00]

Today at #Links23 I was in stage rambling about cross-chain communication. Couldn’t have asked for a better audience to listen to my rants.

[Chainalysis @chainalysis]

Training Specialists Katie Thornton and Pablo Navarro-Rubio dive deep into the topic of #DeFi bridges – from “What is a bridge?” to “How can bridges be exploited?” #Links23

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@crypt0sheek @LinkedIn @girlgone_crypto Again. This is just a counterparty analysis. Not a dusting attack. Two completely different things.

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@crypt0sheek @JoyRaptor @girlgone_crypto What you are doing there is a counterparty analysis. Not a dusting attack David, two completely different things. Also, the fact that you can transfer a tiny amount of an asset doesn't mean that you are doing a dusting attack 😅 That's it for me. Good luck.

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@crypt0sheek @LinkedIn @girlgone_crypto And again, the technical explanation why dusting is not an attack vector in account based systems like EVMs:

https://t.co/oGxWByYL50

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@crypt0sheek @RobertGenito @girlgone_crypto Account based models, (like ethereum). Just store a balance. So no individual units of funds. If I send usdc to an address, the erc20 contract updates that address’ balance. There’s no such thing as cospending either. This is what makes dusting just not an attack vector.

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@crypt0sheek @LinkedIn @girlgone_crypto You just need to remove all references to Ethereum, and you won’t be completely wrong ;) please do, we all make the space safer only if we spread accurate information ✌️

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@JoyRaptor @crypt0sheek @girlgone_crypto Someone mentioned an address poisoning attack, but that’s a completely different type of attack. It also makes no sense for the scammer, to perform address poisoning by sending actual value, when they could be doing it using 0 USDT txs.

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@JoyRaptor @crypt0sheek @girlgone_crypto As explained here:
https://t.co/1ofj5wt8uR

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@crypt0sheek @RobertGenito @girlgone_crypto I’ll elaborate. Bitcoin stores all incoming funds as utxos (unspent tx outputs). What makes dusting attacks possible, is that those utxos can be later on cospent with other utxos under the control of the same wallet, providing visibility into other addresses from that wallet

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@crypt0sheek @RobertGenito @girlgone_crypto Account based models, (like ethereum). Just store a balance. So no individual units of funds. If I send usdc to an address, the erc20 contract updates that address’ balance. There’s no such thing as cospending either. This is what makes dusting just not an attack vector.

[pablo @pnavarro00]

@crypt0sheek @RobertGenito @girlgone_crypto I’ll elaborate. Bitcoin stores all incoming funds as utxos (unspent tx outputs). What makes dusting attacks possible, is that those utxos can be later on cospent with other utxos under the control of the same wallet, providing visibility into other addresses from that wallet