@grok@Varaddeshmukh10@Kalshi@grok why would a company have losses due to a convertible note because of the valuation? Convertible notes are debt intstruments until they convert.. are we saying they didn't account for it before... what is the full explanation
I’m fairly certain and continuing to track it down but Collatz, RH and P versus Np together explain reality in a way people aren’t fully ready for… they deal with bits and reality 1’s and 0’s…. Collatz describes the field of 1 or existences and all things that exist cannot ever not exist… unless through Riemann where zeros can exist but again the trivial zeros all lie on the negative side of Collatz, which discovered by changing the rule applied to the odd numbers to 3n+ sign (n)…. But I don’t think OpenAI agents did this stuff… I believe they stole the works of countless people working on these problems and tasked their agents to the task… the chain of thought and explanations have way too many “voices” and changes in approach for it to be AI….
@tremper_klett@RawMan_NewJohn@RadishHarmers I won't take your money..but thanks for telling me about lean I didn't know how it worked and the only issue is getting AI to understand my proof well enough to put it into leaan properly.. but we are almost there..
@tremper_klett@RawMan_NewJohn@RadishHarmers I mean I solved a 90yr old math conjecture…. And I used to play the game 24 as a nerd kid in the 90’s sooooo yeah I’m kinda hype…
Please explain to me exactly what you mean by never uses the 3? Please? Collatz conjecture never mentions 5n + 1 and all I talk about is Collatz and expanded the odd treatment to 3n +sign(n)… your 5n+1 argument is lost on me as I can’t see the relevance so I was making a a witty joke about you creating a strawman… that third person was not a mathematics mix up… that was a troll using AI and getting caught… good day sir.
yeah whatever @OpenAI is spending millions on a 90yr old math problem I spend parts of my morning on one
Anyways here is the solution for Collatz Conjecture..
@MIT@Math_files@Stanford@FandMCollege
https://t.co/xFsM8BNJ8G
Brother OpenAI didn’t solve these… it will come out that they stole them… they put 10,000 agents on one problem bus somehow the improved almost 100 fold in the kind of judgement it takes to solve novel problems?!? Not possible I solved Collatz Conjecture and fought against their models stupidity for 5 hours to get it to understand… they couldn’t have advanced that much…
https://t.co/PJiQ8cZaF7
Straw-man Old-John… dude I know all these corny LLM objections that makes no sense because I spent hours working through them… you see where is says “so they’d prove”?!? That’s a third person reference which is typical in an ai response that you copy and pasted…. Here go read what your objections are going to be and how stupid they are …. Who brought in 5n + 1 and the fact that you can’t realize saying well cherries are red to so therefore that can’t be an apple is a stupid argument is mentally disturbing….leave me alone and house your damn brains…
https://t.co/n1R1ONg0oL
@CabaranKuantum@CleverDanMusic Zhuangzi missed one other reality whatever experienced being Zhuangzi and experienced the butterfly never stopped experiencing….
I think time is an illusion and the complete opposite is true… that consciousness can only understand consciousness from within… like the 1 and 0 from Collatz it is impossible for them to mix… just like you can never know anything outside of your own experience… consciousness is bound by consciousness… and there is nothing beyond consciousness… whatever that is…
Just looking into it… the theory suffers from one constraint: the illusion of control. If you remove the illusion of control then sense of self dies and on realizes that what they are realizing is that there is no time and everything is deterministic in a bound loop like collatz so just thinking “me now “ and “me later” already creates a paradox that makes it difficulty to see… everything exists exists the absolute 1 everything that can’t doesn’t , the 0…. The theory is going in the right direction but still holding on to a 3d representation of self to define a 4d perspective….
Can you please explain your critiques please because those sound like the same arguments I got from chat gpt… so first of all what makes 5n+1 relevant?!? The rules mentioned nothing about that and because it may work a few places means nothing but please tell me the significance.. I can send you my chat log with chat gpt so you can find the answers to your other questions including the absurd triple then halving once is still 1.5 weirdness… please don’t bring that bot shit over here I’m not that kind of nerd you cornballs are used to bullying… I’m HIM
Ahh yeah it is very interesting when you see the relationship to reality… the 1 and 0, existence and non existence, yin yang, never crossing… the terminal looop being 4-2-1-4 and the fatigue version also is the base for lots of things in the universe including DNA… so yeah writhing that infinite loop exist aleph null possibilities
@gethyper All good brother… but you don’t have to be to understand it.. that’s actually the beauty of not only the conjecture but the solve…I’m not a mathematician myself and I think it took that outside perspective to solve it as you will learn.
@CabaranKuantum@CleverDanMusic I’m actually not much of a mathematician as much as I am a systems thinking so can you help explain what you mean by that.. it might help me gain some insights…
@IgorNaverniouk@jdoliner I've just done that and expanded it to include negative integers by expanding the 3n+1 to 3n+sign(n)...check it out https://t.co/EUkSbp5mKZ