Dear Indian nationalists, Please stop engaging with accounts that post lies, provocative nonsense & rage-bait just to trigger you. These online beggars earn money every time you comment, like or share. Many are anti-India foreign handles or brown sepoys. Starve them.
Congrats to @ECISVEEP. They made communists to hold tiranga.
The CPI(M) (formed 1964) began hoisting the national tricolour at its state/district/party offices nationwide for the first time in 2021 (75th Independence Day), often alongside the party’s red flag.
@SfiDelhi The CPI(M) (formed 1964) began hoisting the national tricolour at its state/district/party offices nationwide for the first time in 2021 (75th Independence Day), often alongside the party’s red flag. These guys are talking about Tiranga!
@sfi_uk The CPI(M) (formed 1964) began hoisting the national tricolour at its state/district/party offices nationwide for the first time in 2021 (75th Independence Day), often alongside the party’s red flag. Kudos to EC..EC made communists to hold our flag.
@SfiDelhi The CPI(M) (formed 1964) began hoisting the national tricolour at its state/district/party offices nationwide for the first time in 2021 (75th Independence Day), often alongside the party’s red flag. These guys are talking about Tiranga!
Journalist said that there are allegations of CJP protestors misbehaving with women security personnel.
Look at the way they all laughed especially Prakash Raj.
Do they consider women's safety a joke?
🚨 WHO IS FUNDING INDIA’S ONE PIECE PROTESTS?
FOLLOW THE MONEY.
If these demonstrations are being organised and financed transparently, the financial trail should withstand scrutiny.
If allegations of undisclosed funding exist, they must be investigated with evidence, not dismissed or accepted blindly.
WHOSE FINANCIAL RECORDS SHOULD BE EXAMINED?
1️⃣ Abhijeet Dipke & the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) — donations, crowdfunding, private contributions and protest expenditure.
2️⃣ Ashutosh Ranka & other reported contributors — the source, amount and purpose of any financial support.
3️⃣ Saurav Das, CJP spokesperson — publicly reported grants, their declared purposes and any documented connection to protest expenses.
4️⃣ Thakur Family Foundation & its founder, Dinesh S. Thakur — grant records, recipients and any verifiable financial links to the organisers.
5️⃣ Neha Bora & the All India Students’ Association (AISA) — organisational funding and expenditure associated with the demonstrations.
6️⃣ George Soros & the Open Society Foundations — publicly disclosed grants and any documented financial connection to organisations involved in these protests.
7️⃣ Alleged Pakistani involvement — investigate any evidence of funding by Pakistani state agencies, intermediaries or private donors.
8️⃣ National Endowment for Democracy (NED), International Republican Institute (IRI) & USAID — examine relevant grant records and recipients for any demonstrable connection to protest financing.
9️⃣ Domestic political parties, businesses, wealthy donors and crowdfunding networks — establish who paid for transport, accommodation, publicity, legal assistance and other protest-related expenses.
⚖️ THE QUESTIONS THAT MATTER:
• Who transferred the money, to whom, and when?
• Were grants or donations declared accurately?
• Did any funding actually reach protest organisers or pay for demonstrations?
• Were foreign intermediaries involved, and is there documentary proof?
• Have independent auditors or competent authorities verified the financial trail?
NO DOUBLE STANDARDS.
NO POLITICAL PROTECTION.
NO UNSUBSTANTIATED ACCUSATIONS.
If there is nothing to hide, transparent accounts should help establish the truth. If there is evidence of unlawful or undisclosed funding, it should be investigated regardless of who is responsible.
Follow the money. Verify the documents. Hold everyone accountable under the law.
🚨 WHO IS FUNDING INDIA’S ONE PIECE PROTESTS?
FOLLOW THE MONEY.
If these demonstrations are being organised and financed transparently, the financial trail should withstand scrutiny.
If allegations of undisclosed funding exist, they must be investigated with evidence, not dismissed or accepted blindly.
WHOSE FINANCIAL RECORDS SHOULD BE EXAMINED?
1️⃣ Abhijeet Dipke & the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) — donations, crowdfunding, private contributions and protest expenditure.
2️⃣ Ashutosh Ranka & other reported contributors — the source, amount and purpose of any financial support.
3️⃣ Saurav Das, CJP spokesperson — publicly reported grants, their declared purposes and any documented connection to protest expenses.
4️⃣ Thakur Family Foundation & its founder, Dinesh S. Thakur — grant records, recipients and any verifiable financial links to the organisers.
5️⃣ Neha Bora & the All India Students’ Association (AISA) — organisational funding and expenditure associated with the demonstrations.
6️⃣ George Soros & the Open Society Foundations — publicly disclosed grants and any documented financial connection to organisations involved in these protests.
7️⃣ Alleged Pakistani involvement — investigate any evidence of funding by Pakistani state agencies, intermediaries or private donors.
8️⃣ National Endowment for Democracy (NED), International Republican Institute (IRI) & USAID — examine relevant grant records and recipients for any demonstrable connection to protest financing.
9️⃣ Domestic political parties, businesses, wealthy donors and crowdfunding networks — establish who paid for transport, accommodation, publicity, legal assistance and other protest-related expenses.
⚖️ THE QUESTIONS THAT MATTER:
• Who transferred the money, to whom, and when?
• Were grants or donations declared accurately?
• Did any funding actually reach protest organisers or pay for demonstrations?
• Were foreign intermediaries involved, and is there documentary proof?
• Have independent auditors or competent authorities verified the financial trail?
NO DOUBLE STANDARDS.
NO POLITICAL PROTECTION.
NO UNSUBSTANTIATED ACCUSATIONS.
If there is nothing to hide, transparent accounts should help establish the truth. If there is evidence of unlawful or undisclosed funding, it should be investigated regardless of who is responsible.
Follow the money. Verify the documents. Hold everyone accountable under the law.
🚨 WHO IS FUNDING INDIA’S ONE PIECE PROTESTS?
FOLLOW THE MONEY.
If these demonstrations are being organised and financed transparently, the financial trail should withstand scrutiny.
If allegations of undisclosed funding exist, they must be investigated with evidence, not dismissed or accepted blindly.
WHOSE FINANCIAL RECORDS SHOULD BE EXAMINED?
1️⃣ Abhijeet Dipke & the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) — donations, crowdfunding, private contributions and protest expenditure.
2️⃣ Ashutosh Ranka & other reported contributors — the source, amount and purpose of any financial support.
3️⃣ Saurav Das, CJP spokesperson — publicly reported grants, their declared purposes and any documented connection to protest expenses.
4️⃣ Thakur Family Foundation & its founder, Dinesh S. Thakur — grant records, recipients and any verifiable financial links to the organisers.
5️⃣ Neha Bora & the All India Students’ Association (AISA) — organisational funding and expenditure associated with the demonstrations.
6️⃣ George Soros & the Open Society Foundations — publicly disclosed grants and any documented financial connection to organisations involved in these protests.
7️⃣ Alleged Pakistani involvement — investigate any evidence of funding by Pakistani state agencies, intermediaries or private donors.
8️⃣ National Endowment for Democracy (NED), International Republican Institute (IRI) & USAID — examine relevant grant records and recipients for any demonstrable connection to protest financing.
9️⃣ Domestic political parties, businesses, wealthy donors and crowdfunding networks — establish who paid for transport, accommodation, publicity, legal assistance and other protest-related expenses.
⚖️ THE QUESTIONS THAT MATTER:
• Who transferred the money, to whom, and when?
• Were grants or donations declared accurately?
• Did any funding actually reach protest organisers or pay for demonstrations?
• Were foreign intermediaries involved, and is there documentary proof?
• Have independent auditors or competent authorities verified the financial trail?
NO DOUBLE STANDARDS.
NO POLITICAL PROTECTION.
NO UNSUBSTANTIATED ACCUSATIONS.
If there is nothing to hide, transparent accounts should help establish the truth. If there is evidence of unlawful or undisclosed funding, it should be investigated regardless of who is responsible.
Follow the money. Verify the documents. Hold everyone accountable under the law.
> Abhijeet Dipke : I don't believe in Supreme Courts, ECI and Police
> Neha Bora: We get our motivation from Bangladesh Regime Change.
> Yogendra Yadav : Parliament will not decide, streets will decide India's future
> Prashant Bhushan: We will not stop untill we are successful in Regime change
> Dhruv Rathee : Army and Police should revolt against the current regime.
Do you still think it's about Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commision?
@thecaravanindia If you believe in constitution, go to court. If you don't believe in court, election, govt then don't say you believe in constitution.