T

[T @prettywittyish]

The coincidences are just uncanny, aren’t they? Looks like we know who authored Morrisey’s pre recorded message to potential jurors back in 2023. Morrisey is just the McAlberts’ mouthpiece..it’s like watching a snake eat its own tail. #karenread #investigatecanton

[T @prettywittyish]

Tik tok banned my ability to make photo comments because I posted this one I used Grok to create. I guess Larry is making progress on the new TikTok isrealgorithm. Ramp up your data privacy kids ASAP. Use a VPN & data removal service. #surveillance

[T @prettywittyish]

@JDVance if monopolies are “bad for liberty and prosperity,” start here:
Break up monopolies like UnitedHealth Group
Ban PBM kickbacks.
Rebuild real competition from prescription to payment.
Start protecting AMERICAN health-not corporate profits. #antitrust

[T @prettywittyish]

Vance: “When you have one or two companies dominating a single sector, it’s bad for liberty and bad for prosperity.”
Then why is UnitedHealth Group—a monopoly vertically integrated from prescription to payment—still protected? Where’s the America First when profit > pain?

[T @prettywittyish]

Vance: “My job is to look out for the people of the United States.” Every job outsourced overseas isn’t just lost labor — it’s lost income tax, local spending, and future growth. Corps cut costs while America loses revenue, skills, and stability. Global efficiency=domestic decay.

[T @prettywittyish]

@SandraBarr28075 @DropMicrodots I wouldn’t trust anything produced by Canton PD.

[T @prettywittyish]

@eupaulaprado I love this woman! Reacting to lunacy with sarcasm; the chef’s kiss of responses.

[T @prettywittyish]

@eupaulaprado Anyone that calls a bilingual individual “unintelligent” or mistakes an accent for ignorance is the definition of the offensive words they wield. ❤️

[T @prettywittyish]

@DoctorTurtleboy @kreadisinnocent In Johnny D’s defense, the fake juror told him “I was an alternate, I was an alternate, I was an alternate”.

[T @prettywittyish]

@BostonDefender The irony is that flat-earthers are science-deniers which is precisely what you must be to believe Karen Read is guilty.

[T @prettywittyish]

@Bederowlaw Juror harassment is a crime under M.G.L. c. 268, § 13B and includes publicly criticizing a juror’s decision, POST case conclusion.
Paula-contact the Jury Commissioner's office to report them-if the harassment is by an attorney, report it to the Board of Bar Overseers. ❤️

[T @prettywittyish]

@Bederowlaw You are too kind sir & give them too much credit. These are the same people basing guilt on 3 words Jen McCabe & a couple of questionable paramedics claimed she said but were never corroborated in ANY report. You can’t use logic with science-deniers. Leave them to their fantasy.

[T @prettywittyish]

@Bederowlaw Looks like she has a little typo that’s confusing everyone—easy enough to fix:
It’s J-e-n-n-i-f-e-r
not
j-u-r-o-r-s.
There. Now it makes sense. You’re welcome, Jenny C.

[T @prettywittyish]

@Bederowlaw I would like to highlight the truth in this statement. The O’Keefe’s (specifically John) DID deserve better from the justice system. Proctor, the Albert’s and McCabes (among others) made sure he didn’t get the very justice he deserved.

[T @prettywittyish]

@kreadisinnocent Phil, that you?? How fitting!

[T @prettywittyish]

@Bederowlaw @DoctorTurtleboy If gaslighting was a person….

[T @prettywittyish]

So..to summarize the “evidence” ..you have voicemails, suspicions, excuses, presumptions, and your own self serving interpretation of the data that your “experts” couldn’t interpret with certainty. ..I’m bored as fuck, Hank. #FreeKarenRead #fuckhankandbev

[T @prettywittyish]

@kreadisinnocent @suspiciousauce Something stinks….

[T @prettywittyish]

@Bederowlaw Who the fuck feels sorry for Brennan? Hank is, hands down, the most underhanded, seedy, unsavory weasel I’ve ever witnessed. He was hired for a reason: he will do what the ethical will not. And he did just that. Seeds are sown, Hanky. Hope it was worth it.

[T @prettywittyish]

At what point would a prosecutor, while cross examining experts whose science-based opinions staunchly oppose the State’s theory, begin to doubt their case/reconsider the charges against a defendant? Does it exist? Does pride always trump duty (assuming duty=pursuit of truth)?