Decoding Prop 24 by Brandi Bennett "More insidious is the idea of paying for our privacy that Yang’s dividend would lead to." #prop24 https://t.co/GU6W2EpdaO
Time to ban Bitcoin? As COVID hospitalizations soar, so do ransomware attacks on health care facilities. Cryptocurrencies make this possible. @RedTapeChron https://t.co/WuuxsidLtI
@nelibadass I know, right? Like, just vote no! If people didn’t read it, then at least take a lesson from the people who did read it. IT’S LONG & TWISTED, and screws with our privacy rights, there are soooo many bad provisions tucked in there. #Prop24
New York Times opinion piece by Editorial Board member @GregBensinger explains why Prop 24 is bad for privacy Vote #NoOnProp24#Prop24
https://t.co/xyJTOus7dS
@IAM__Network #Prop24 is chockful of loopholes and exemptions that weaken privacy rights. "Ensuring the loopholes are closed should be a goal, but not at the cost of opening up new ones." https://t.co/DWsWHFtl9o
Confused by Prop 24's mind-numbing 27,000 words of legal jargon? Take a few minutes to read the League of Women Voters impartial analysis and you will most likely agree with their recommendation to Vote NO On #Prop24@LWVC
https://t.co/ODmZJtAsD7
This is Pay for Privacy language. #Prop24 locks in wealth-based privacy. One reason Color of Change, Black Lives Matter LA, ACLU, CA Alliance for Retired Americans, League of Women Voters, Consumer Federation, Dolores Huerta say VOTE NO on Prop 24. @ACLU_CAP @LWVC@DoloresHuerta
Also in the fine print of Prop 24: It sets a low ceiling on our privacy rights. It locks in its pay for privacy, elimination of privacy when you travel, and other reductions to privacy rights, making it next to impossible for lawmakers to fix its many flaws. #Prop24#NoOnProp24
Have you read Prop 24's 52 pages of fine print? Maybe you should before you vote. That is where it hides the REDUCTIONS to our privacy rights. #Prop24#NoOnProp24
NEW: @nytimes comes out AGAINST Prop 24:
"Voters should reject Prop 24 and hold out for a less muddled solution that both closes the law’s loopholes and sets a proper baseline standard for other states"
-@GregBensinger#NOonProp24
https://t.co/XGbjyFdpIA
"Voters should reject Prop 24 and hold out for a less muddled solution that both closes the law’s loopholes and sets a proper baseline standard for other states." @GregBensinger editorial board member @nytimes#VOTE NO on #Prop24
Privacy is not a luxury, and we should not have to pay to ensure our data is protected.
Vote NO on Prop 24 to stop a fake privacy law that puts vulnerable communities’ privacy at risk. #NoOn24 https://t.co/LH7RfkDFGh
San Francisco Chronicle Editorial: Vote No on Prop. 24, "a complex, legalistic 52-page initiative crafted behind the scenes, including participation of the companies that are the supposed targets of regulation." @sfchronicle#Prop24#NoOnProp24 https://t.co/5cRoutqWNG