@JohnBrittas Other than Vizhinjam, which project was supported by Keralam?
Nokku coolie, bandh, and no land for anyone, why crying now?
And BTW, you chased even Kitex.
Kudos to the girl to come on camera and saying this loud and clear.
It's the Hindus in Karnataka that should be careful and smart to do what is supposed to do; to keep the culture of Sanatan Dharm protected.
Watch the full video...
@Regular__Indian limit production, get the items only for self and party, keep others deprived. that has been the congress way of governance for years starting from Jehru
@maa_bhaishiiH the socialist model screwed our country big time. foolishness of the then high post guys (dont want to call them lead-ers" lead-errors they were!
Modi govt destroyed the ISI-backed terror group Shahzad Bhatti Network ahead of Independence Day and thwarted its plans for subversive attacks by arresting more than 200 operatives.
Indian security forces ripped apart the network by launching coordinated operations across different locations in 14 states upholding a brilliant example of India's zero-tolerance towards terrorism.
Substantial recoveries, including IEDs, grenades bearing Pakistan Ordnance Factory markings, pistols, live cartridges, and CCTV cameras used for espionage, were made from the ISI-funded group. The network was involved in several terrorist activities.
P. Chidambaram stood in Parliament in 1998 and called India's nuclear tests a vanity project. Congress opposed one of the most consequential strategic decisions in independent India's history. And history has delivered its verdict on that opposition.
When Operation Shakti detonated at Pokhran and India formally declared itself a nuclear weapons state, Chidambaram argued that nuclear weaponisation went against India's philosophy and moral values. That building nuclear weapons was beneath what India stood for.
International sanctions followed immediately. America, Japan and several Western nations imposed economic pressure designed to make India reverse course. For a period the diplomatic and economic cost was real and significant.
Now look at 1998 from 2025.
India sits between two nuclear armed neighbours. Pakistan to the west with weapons and a stated willingness to use them as diplomatic blackmail. China to the north with an arsenal that has grown substantially over the same period. Both countries have at various points used the implicit or explicit threat of nuclear capability to shape their dealings with India.
The deterrence India established at Pokhran has been the single most consequential factor in preventing either neighbour from miscalculating the cost of direct military confrontation at the highest level.
Operation Sindoor demonstrated this in real time. India struck Pakistani military infrastructure across 11 airbases and 9 terror sites while Pakistan's nuclear arsenal sat in its silos. Because both sides understood the doctrine. Because India had established credible deterrence in 1998 and built on it for 27 years.
What Congress called a vanity project in Parliament has functioned as the foundational guarantee of Indian sovereignty for nearly three decades.
The leaders who opposed it were wrong.
The leaders who authorised it were right.
And the scientists of DRDO and India's strategic programme who made it happen under enormous secrecy and international pressure made one of the most important decisions in independent India's history.
Pokhran-II was not vanity.
It was survival. Planned in advance. Before the need became obvious to everyone.
That is what real strategic thinking looks like.