@IanMalcolm84@grok CHANGE PROMPT PERSOECTIVE: Ask grok who /where / distance away is the thing/person filming. If it replies with 100 feet up that would trip up the claim that the tank is a computer chip.
Over the last three months, there has been a repeatable and extremely sizable footprint in the /ES market that consistently comes in and drives equities lower.
The flow has a very specific execution pattern. They pile into the order book, aggressively taking liquidity tick after tick through what looks like a compressed TWAP. The price impact is immediate, and the pressure tends to remain heavy throughout the moment they turn the program on. In some ways, it resembles forced or margin-related selling (waterfall like selling), despite the fact that it clearly isn’t. When they release from the orderbook, the market slightly bounces and then trades in a small range for the remaining part of the day. There’s other execution tendencies this end user has. I won’t list out all for obvious reasons but at this point I’m sure a lot of traders are seeing this.
What makes it particularly interesting is trying to conceptualize what type of shop could be behind it. There are very few firms in the world with a balance sheet large enough to consistently trade this kind of size and execute in such an elementary manner.
And no it’s not due to gamma or delta hedging. It doesn’t behave like a traditional equity derivatives dealer that would be hedging out delta/ gamma risk. The execution is less sophisticated, and the footprint tends to have a strong cross-asset relationship with moves in rates, which isn’t typically what you would expect from an equity derivatives market maker. It’s not a vol control fund, it’s not a pension or endowment. Which narrows the list down for those with a creative mind.
These things end up making headlines weeks or months later. Whatever this flow is, it’s truly fascinating to watch this footprint reappear every few days with such force, consistency, and lack of care to hide their impact. I’m not sure I have ever seen a flow like this while markets are so close to all time highs.
Oh! You think it’s all authentic?
Ah. Let me explain the game again.
I’m forced to call attention to what I have done. Then an enormous network of accounts that no one individually cares about explode in ridicule. Why? So the USG can continue to use academics to cover its statecraft.
You see, I am fighting for academic freedom to go back to kicking ass.
I am fighting the U.S. Govenrment’s right to direct and pressure science and academe to falsify the scientific and academic record. I have an amazing record on this. But I am forced to call attention to it. This allows a largely inauthentic bot network to rise up against me as if I am Satan or a Buffon. They can’t figure out which story to pursue. Witness:
I wasn’t supposed to observe that Biden wasn’t president during “his presidency”. Geriatric neurologists were supposed to do that. But they were silent.
I wasn’t supposed to observe that something is trying to hold back mathematics and physics before the Fields medalist letter and the @pmarca@bhorowitz revelations. Physicists and mathematician Professors were supposed to do that. But they were silent.
I’m not supposed to have point out a Lagrangian/Action or equations at the top of my feed when @seanmcarroll lied that I have “none of that”. My colleagues are supposed to do that. But they are mostly silent.
I wasn’t supposed to have co-authored the first article on Mortgage Backed Securities danger in 2001 while everyone was celebrating Greenspan and the Great Moderation. Economists and finance professors were supposed to do that. But they were silent.
I wasnt supposed to call out Dale Jorgenson as chair of @HarvardEcon for trying to steal $ 1trillion at the direction of Senators Packwood and Moynihan while the Boskin Commision was sheepskin washing the crime. My colleagues in that department owed me that. But they were silent.
I wasnt supposed to trace the H1B visa to a secret 1986 @NSF PRA program involving Myles Boylan, Peter House and Erich Bloch to destroy American Scientists bargaining position. The law was supposed to find this. It did not.
I wasn’t supposed to have to point out that the 77 Nobel Laureates backing Daszak and the EcoHealth NGO cutout was cover for Bio Weapons research gone horribly wrong. That was the responsibility of biologists, virologists, epidemiologists and Ralph Baric. But they fell silent,
I’m not supposed to point out that Peer Review in science really dates to 1975 and not Nov 1662, because Merton appears to have falsified the history…presumably to allow for journals to control the flow of science. Historians of science are supposed to be screaming this. But they refuse.
Etc.
And I’m not supposed to point out that Geometric Unity is our leading candidate for a “Theory of Everything.” And has been since I brought it to Harvard over 40 years ago. Because @seanmcarroll is willing to lie about it and the community is silent.
This goes on like this…
The world is stupid weak and crazy on every one of the above. Not by accident and in exactly the same way.
Academe has been captured. And I have the most complete track record on this. By far.
That’s why.
It’s about a falsified institutional narrative being protected by a bot network and some very nasty accounts.
Look at the modal account making the nasty comments. 300 followers not followed by anyone you follow. A bot.
That’s how the game is played. And for some reason @elonmusk won’t put a stop to it yet on this platform. But I bet he will one day. Before @YouTube and @Reddit. And then the hate will dry up except for islamists, communists and a few other misguided souls.
Now you know. 🤷♀️
Stunned by a post: a 21-year-old American college student made $43,000 in a month with an AI virtual girlfriend.
He set up an OnlyFans account called Maya. This Maya is 22 years old, tagged as a UCF psychology dropout, with 1,247 paid subscribers, and the highest-spending fan shelled out $1,847. But the most crucial part? The girl in those photos doesn't even exist.
No real person on camera, no real person typing. All the messages are written by AI, the photos are AI-generated, and the voice is AI-synthesized. The entire Maya boils down to just four documents on his MacBook.
Back in the day, building an AI virtual influencer took anywhere from six months to a year and a half. Now, he's got it running in just 4 weeks. Looking ahead, it might take only a weekend to whip one up.
These four files break down like this:
· persona.md, spelling out Maya's character, backstory, and likes;
· voice.md, locking in her speaking tone and voice style;
· flux.md, standardizing her appearance and photo style to ensure all images look like the same person;
· brain.md, logging what each subscriber has chatted about and their preferences.
Before the AI replies to any fan, it reads through all four files, so the persona never breaks, and it never forgets what the fan has said.
Truth be told, the tech stack is so ridiculously simple it's almost absurd. That famous virtual influencer Aitana López from before? Her team took 18 months to pull her together. Now, a Maya-style setup is done and dusted in 4 weeks.
This isn't sci-fi—it's something anyone with a computer can replicate step by step. And it's not just OnlyFans; slap this workflow onto Instagram, TikTok, or Twitch, and it'll run just as smoothly.
AI has basically driven the cost of creating a virtual person down to zero. At this point, the only real barrier left is whether you've got the taste to decide what this virtual person should even look like..
@gurgavin Are they in the same industry?
Industry-Specific Contagion: If the two dozen people you know are clustered in similar industries. AmEx may have flagged that entire sector as high-risk, triggering sweeping, automated limits across all related business profiles.
Every dollar you've earned represents something you've already given up to get it: your time, energy, skill, and labor.
You can't reclaim those hours.
So, protecting wealth isn't just about preserving dollars. It's about preserving the value of work you've already done.
#Career #Paycheck #PurchasingPower #MoneyMindset #WealthPreservation #PersonalFinance
Joe Rogan yells "Holy sh*t!" after Harvard professor of genetics David Sinclair says sudden blindness has DOUBLED because of GLP-1 drugs.
Then Rogan pulls up the data himself — and what he reads out loud is even worse.
SINCLAIR: "Glaucoma and also sudden blindness. It's called NAION, which is now twice as more prevalent because of the GLP-1 drugs."
ROGAN: "Really?!"
SINCLAIR: "It's not well known. Obviously companies don't want to talk about it. But yes, sudden blindness has doubled, seemingly because of these meds."
ROGAN: "Holy shit!"
SINCLAIR: "Careful."
ROGAN: "Sudden blindness has doubled because of GLP-1s?"
SINCLAIR: "Due to NAION, which is like a stroke in your eye, and then your other eye can go. Which is pretty scary. And there's nothing you can do about it. Hopefully our drug does work for those people."
ROGAN: "And, obviously correlation does not equal causation, but it seems to be."
SINCLAIR: "Yeah, there's a scientist at Harvard. You could look up his work. Joe Rizzo. It looks like it's repeatable across the planet."
ROGAN: "Wow, that's terrible. Terrible because there's so many people out there that are just telling everyone they should get on GLP-1s… Like online podcasters saying, 'Everyone should get on GLP-1s… It's going to transform society.' I'm like, 'We just started taking these! The f*ck are you saying?!'"
SINCLAIR: "Yeah, it's not risk free. Same with ED drugs."
ROGAN: "Here goes. Recent studies suggest that a potential risk — rare link between GLP-1 receptor agonist medications such as Ozempic, Wegovy, blah, blah, blah, and… an eye stroke [that] can cause sudden, painless loss of vision in one eye, while absolute risk remains very low."
ROGAN: "Well, very low is like… What does that mean?"
SINCLAIR: "One in 10,000 people."
ROGAN: "One in 10,000?"
SINCLAIR: "Oh no. Total of 10,000."
ROGAN: "Oh, total of 10,000 so far? How many people are taking this stuff?"
[Rogan continues reading]
"The drugs were 68.6 times more likely to develop this [eye stroke] and 8 times more likely to develop… diabetic retinopathy."
ROGAN: "Oh, my God. Then… Wow."
ROGAN: "Yeah, man. These things are just — they're just rolling out…"
@dana_marlane 😆 last time I was on twitter you used to love Elon. He was your boy! Not say in he isn't full of it (salesmen always are) just observing thr pivot.
Yes, Joe Felz (not Feltz) died at 40. His partner Alxzondra confirmed it Aug 3 and rejected speculation as false narratives. No cause released.
He digitized rare books at https://t.co/xkKDNZb14c (free registration). Site is live with 1812 Bible scans including Esdras, Apocrypha and more. He also offered free solar/off-grid designs. No evidence links the death to the project.
Joe Feltz has died at the age of 40.
Joe had been collecting rare, sacred, hidden & last editions of old & ancient books & was in the process of scanning & uploading them as a free source on the internet.
Joe has been found dead, the cause of death has not yet been released.
Some of the books included original Masonic books & bibles, The 1812 Bible (including the Book of Esdras, Wisdom of Solomon, Apocrypha, and Psalms), The Lost Books of the Bible, Conversations on the Bible, Encyclopaedia of Witchcraft & Demonology (chronicling the inquisitions & Salem witch trials), Ancient Magic & Magnetism & much more.
Many of these books showed many inconsistencies with the modern version of history & exposed many hidden secrets.
Joe was also created free blueprints & online design tools to help his audience build their own off-grid power systems without expensive corporate costs & with free energy.
R.I.P & Fly High Joe 🤍🕊️