Javad Fardaei

This is my theory. If we are smart, atoms are smart. The Universe is not result of a Big Bang, it is complete entity with journey to follow. my books r say it.

[Prof. Brian Keating @Briankeating]

String theory's version of Churchillian Drift:
“An equation one inch long that lets us read the mind of God. These are Einstein's words." -@michiokaku

Wonderful line. Wrong physicist.

That's Hawking’s final flourish in A Brief History of Time, not Einstein -- Albert didn't live long enough to have a string in his eye.

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

This is the gravity's work in nature of our universe.. https://t.co/kWmtnYqLtc

[Black Hole @konstructivizm]

Jupiter Has No Solid Surface

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

I know our 2d static math does not recognize colors, tastes...and can not describe 3d of anything of nature that it is changing like this image 😀

[Mathelirium @mathelirium]

Magnetic Flux Turns a Torus Into a Wavefunction

A quantum particle is confined to a torus, with magnetic flux threading through its two closed cycles.

The eigenstates are twisted momentum waves,

Ψₘₙ(u,v) = exp(i(mu+nv)),

but the flux shifts their energies to

Eₘₙ = ½[(m−φᵤ)² + (n−φᵥ)²],

changing how the superposition beats over time.

In this scene, the torus is the quantum configuration space. Its surface swells with |Ψ|², its colours follow arg Ψ, and the magnetic flux turns the wavefunction into a luminous braid wrapped around a multiply connected universe.

#QuantumMechanics #MathematicalPhysics #Wavefunction #AharonovBohmEffect #QuantumArt #PhysicsVisualization

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

He also claimed that flashlight making mass in distance...for prove it he said flashlight is lighter 😀

[Prof. Brian Keating @Briankeating]

Michio Kaku just told 4 million people that dark matter is "the next octave" of 11-dimensional string theory.

Evidence for that claim: none.
Evidence for string theory's 11 dimensions? Also none.

He's the best communicator alive.
That's exactly why accuracy matters.
🪒New Keating's Razor: https://t.co/yFLTL45sq5

[مملی فشفشه👑(مملی طلای سابق اکانت سوم) @MFshfshh71601]

چرا دختران ایرانی نباید چادر مشکی به سر کنن؟
کلیپ رو ببین و ریتوییت کن تا همه ببینن.
پاینده ایران جاوید شاه
#ننگ_بر_سه_فاسد_ملا_چپی_مجاهد
#ریدم_تو_اسلام
#پرچم_شیر_و_خورشید

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

How could our 2d static math that it does not recognize colors, tastes, smells...can describe 3d of nature that it is changing every moment? To be honest, he use his imagination that it is not science, science should be easy and fact for layman..

[Prof. Brian Keating @Briankeating]

A Ball Fills 75% of a Square. In 1,000 Dimensions, It Fills 0.0001% | Terence Tao

[Vakilipour @vakilipor]

قلبم دیگه واقعا درد میکنه😭

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

Gravity is not as our past icons thought as mass force.
This article from UK science Journal ...
https://t.co/kWmtnYqLtc

[Prof. Brian Keating @Briankeating]

98% of Scientists Believe in Aliens — But Have Zero Evidence

Hugh Ross (@RTB_HRoss)

[H. Ferdosy | ح. فردوسی @AuthorHFerry]

این چند دقیقه از @arashaalaei عزیز رو به همه پیشنهاد می کنم گوش بدید. خیلی زیبا توضیح می ده که چرا حمایت از شاهزاده در حال حاضر جدای از گرایش های سیاسی شخصی یک تصمیم مهم استراتژیک هست برای آینده.

[ايران اينترنشنال @IranIntl]

بهنام ایزدی، جوان ۳۵ ساله اهل نورآباد، شامگاه ۱۸ دی در جریان اعتراضات ممسنی هدف تیراندازی سرکوبگران قرار گرفت. خودروی پیکان این جاویدنام با آثار گلوله، میان نزدیکانش به نماد شجاعت بهنام تبدیل شده است.

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

Everything that made of atom try to be sphere, like all the gas molecules in space, trillions of suns, planets, moons in the universe, or raindrop, or bubble on earth. Sphere is the language of universe, and they effected by temperature, pressure and changing with them, no mechanically.

[ScieVision @scievision369]

Quantom atom theory ✍️

The diagram shows a molecule called "Buckminsterfullerene", which consists of 60 carbon atoms arranged in a perfect ball shape, similar to a soccer ball. This molecule forms naturally when graphite is heated. At the center of this ball sits electromagnetic radiation, which is energy in the form of light, heat, and waves, spreading outward in all directions like ripples in water. When the temperature around an atom changes, it causes the atom to release energy waves at different speeds and strengths. Higher temperatures produce stronger, faster waves, while lower temperatures yield weaker, slower ones. The four arrows labeled "Time" around the sphere illustrate that atomic behavior follows the same rules whether time moves forward or backward. Overall, the diagram aims to show that this 60-atom molecule serves as a natural model for understanding how atoms absorb and release energy, with temperature and time both playing key roles in that process. However, while the individual ideas are based in real science, the way they are combined here represents a speculative interpretation rather than standard accepted physics.

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

Nature is amazing, no two planets or moons..., follower, snowflakes are the same. Sadly we think our 2d static math that does not recognize color,...can describe these phenomenon that it is changing every moment.

[Physics In History @PhysInHistory]

The Fibonacci sequence isn’t just a math trick—it’s everywhere in nature. From sunflower seeds to galaxies, the universe has a secret love affair with spirals.

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

Every snowflakes have different shapes, while they are made up same molecule of water, thus no two leaves are the same. all of our five oceans has their own colors.. these never be able to show them 2d with our math.

[Mathematica @mathemetica]

Fractals: The Hidden Mathematics of Nature’s Infinite Beauty 🧵

Have you ever noticed how a tree branch looks like a smaller version of the whole tree? Or how a coastline looks equally jagged whether you zoom in or zoom out?

This is the world of Fractals; shapes that repeat their patterns at every scale. (1/5)

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

Science should be easy for every one equally, not just for few that they think they know everything. 😀

[The Scientific Lens @LensScientific]

“Only a few know, how much one must know, to know how little one knows”

― Werner Heisenberg

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

How are you?
Nice to hear from you.. 😀

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

How could mass of electron move in gas, liquid, and hard mass of atom at same speed?

[ScieVision @scievision369]

Louis de Broglie ✍️

It proposed something radical in 1924: electrons, which everyone assumed were tiny solid balls, actually behave like waves. To see why this matters, think about a guitar string. It can only vibrate at certain specific notes the ones where the wave fits perfectly between the two fixed ends. Any other frequency causes the wave to clash with itself and disappear. De Broglie realized that electrons orbiting an atom work exactly the same way. The electron is a wave wrapping around the nucleus, and it can only exist at orbits where that wave fits perfectly around the full circle without crashing into itself. One complete wave fits the innermost orbit, two waves fit the next orbit out, three waves the next, and so on always whole numbers, never anything in between. This single idea answered a mystery that had puzzled scientists for years. They already knew electrons only existed at specific fixed distances from the nucleus, but nobody could explain why. De Broglie's answer was elegant: "those are simply the only places where the wave fits". Every other distance is forbidden because the wave would destroy itself. This wasn't just a clever theory it rewrote our understanding of what matter fundamentally is, and it directly led to electron microscopes, the semiconductor chips inside every computer and smartphone, and MRI machines. All of modern technology quietly rests on the insight that particles are waves, and waves can only fit in certain places.

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

Our universe with over trillions galaxies, where each galaxy hold billions of solar systems with sphere objects is a complete well organized, everything in space create sphere, (hydrogen gas), and asteroid cannot be sphere because.. https://t.co/GbKuIgYswT

[Erika  @ExploreCosmos_]

Understanding the Universe means learning to think across an almost absurd range of physical scales.

Space is filled with planets, stars, stellar remnants, black holes, galaxies, galaxy clusters, filaments, and vast regions of matter and emptiness. But the interesting part is not only that some objects are small and others are huge.

The real lesson is that every class of object has its own internal limits, and those limits are set by physics.

At small scales, gravity is not always the dominant force. Below a few hundred kms, objects are usually shaped more by electromagnetic forces and material strength than by self-gravity. That is why many asteroids are irregular rather than spherical. Once an object becomes massive enough, gravity can pull it toward hydrostatic equilibrium, making it round.

Icy bodies can reach that state at smaller sizes than rocky ones because ice is easier to deform. This is why a small moon such as Mimas can look roughly spherical, while some larger rocky asteroids may still not be perfectly relaxed by gravity.

Planets show that size and mass do not always scale in an intuitive way. Gas giants can become much more massive than Jupiter without becoming much larger, because added mass compresses their interiors.

Some “super-puff” exoplanets, by contrast, can have enormous radii despite relatively low masses, because their atmospheres are extremely extended. Brown dwarfs push this idea even further: they are far more massive than planets, sometimes massive enough to fuse deuterium, but their physical size remains roughly comparable to Jupiter’s because degeneracy pressure and compression prevent them from simply swelling with mass.

Stars span a far wider range. The smallest hydrogen-burning red dwarfs are only somewhat larger than Jupiter, while the largest red supergiants can expand to sizes approaching the scale of Saturn’s orbit.

Stellar remnants then invert many everyday expectations. White dwarfs are roughly Earth-sized or smaller, with more massive white dwarfs generally being smaller because their matter is compressed more strongly. Neutron stars are even more extreme: they pack more than a solar mass into a sphere only about 20 to 25 kms across.

Black holes are the most radical case, because their “size” is defined by the event horizon. Known bhs range from stellar-remnant objects with event horizons measured in kilometers to supermassive black holes whose horizons can be larger than the Solar System.

On galactic scales, the same principle applies: categories have enormous internal variation. The smallest candidate galaxies may be only tens of light-years across and contain very few stars, blurring the line between dwarf galaxies and star clusters.

At the other extreme, enormous galaxies such as IC 1101 extend for millions of light-years and contain staggering amounts of stellar mass. Galaxy groups and clusters can be compact or spread across tens of millions of light-years. Even black hole jets can reach similar scales, with the largest known jets extending over more than 20 million light-years.

The largest structures are not individual bound objects in the ordinary sense. Cosmic filaments and walls can stretch for more than a billion light-years, tracing the cosmic web shaped by gravity, dark matter, cosmic expansion, and dark energy.

However, not every apparent pattern in the sky is a real physical structure. Some proposed giant structures may simply be chance alignments or incomplete mappings of distant absorbers and galaxies. At the largest scales, the Universe becomes statistically homogeneous: the cosmic web has structure, but there is a limit to how large truly coherent structures can be.

@bigthink
@StartsWithABang

👉 https://t.co/XElAP5YfmC

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

Reality of science is fact, and it does not come with imagination...😀

[Cosmos Archive @cosmosarcive]

"Reality evolves through imagination."

[Dr.M. @MChok7]

ایران ارث پدریمان است
ایران را پس میگیریم

#KingRezaPahlavi

[Javad Fardaei @QMUbook]

He used his imagination, where up to this date no one observed particles.

[ScieVision @scievision369]

Dirac Quantization Condition ✍️

Paul Dirac was a brilliant physicist who noticed something strange about the universe. Every charged particle carries charge in exact whole numbers, never fractions or random values. Nobody could explain why. In 1931, Dirac had a radical idea: what if a particle existed that was just a lone magnetic pole, like a north pole without a south pole? We call this a magnetic monopole. Using quantum mechanics, he showed that if even one of these monopoles existed anywhere in the universe, it would force every electric charge everywhere to fall into neat, whole-number values. This happens because quantum mechanics requires particles to behave consistently when they travel around a monopole. The only way to guarantee that consistency is if charges come in discrete, organized steps. So one single magnetic monopole, just one anywhere in the entire cosmos, would explain why all charge in the universe is quantized. The remarkable thing is that no one has ever actually found a magnetic monopole. Yet the idea remains one of the most elegant in all of physics, as it takes one of nature's deepest mysteries and solves it with a single beautiful logical argument.