Physicists: please consider signing this open letter of support: https://t.co/hfaIC02biK
The University wants to cut a third of academic and related staff from the School of Physics and Astronomy.
As well as astronomy & particle cosmology, we also do world-leading research in cold atoms, condensed matter and medical imaging, and were 2nd only to Cambridge across the last 3 REFs.
Something's badly wrong with science research funding.
Incremental progress is funded – quite right too.
Fads are funded – inevitable because of fallibilism.
But attempts to make fundamental progress aren't – that's a slow-motion catastrophe.
I wrote an article with @quantum_abdul and @avramidou to put the implications of Panpsychism in the context of fundamental physics. This article was written for an essay competition, but it is publicly available now.
#Physics#scicomm
https://t.co/Ub2YEeZ6gs
@luscofusch@LatFilosof This is super cool! I didn't know she was that influential in her field. She helped me structure a project on philosophy of physics and was also an assessor for a progression review. She was erudite and extremely kind with her time. Good to see her name here!
@katherineveritt That is an interesting perspective! In your opinion are these two distinct states in 3-d space? Do you also accept unique outcomes in qm post measurement?
@coecke Jermey and Harvey are still around even if retired. Among current faculty James Reed is doing excellent work on philosophy of spacetime/GR and Chris Timpson on qm.
A lot of people are posting their thoughts on the physics Nobel prize. And I’m jet lagged and can’t sleep. So why not me too. First off, John Hopfield is a physicist, an outstanding one, whose work then branched out in various directions. Geoff Hinton is not. 1/