QueenOfSons

You say I'm a TERF like it's a bad thing?! Stroppy.

English is not my first language, frequent typos.

[QueenOfSons @QueenOfSons]

I am so very devastated...my sister lives in Tas and she is visiting us now, 1000s of kilometres away. So I touched on this topic with her. And her immediate response:
(1/10)

[Let Women Speak Official @StandingforXX]

"A new ruling in Tasmania decrees that lesbians will be breaking the law if they host single-sex spaces. Anti-Discrimination Commissioner Sarah Bolt banned LGB Alliance Tasmania from hosting lesbian events that exclude transwomen"

https://t.co/Y7qbCLziVD

[QueenOfSons @QueenOfSons]

@lespauljunior3 @amscanlon I agree with you!

But...should the fy then not be fieh? As in the first syllable sound of fiction?

I think I just messed up my own mind.

[Bernard Lane @Bernard_Lane]

Dr Astha Tomar, president of Australia's college of psychiatry, has rejected any suggestion she has a conflict of interest arising from her ties to the mental health organisation Orygen, which offers cross-sex hormones to minors.

The college recently suspended Dr Andrew Amos, a critic of youth gender medicine, and had another critic Dr Jillian Spencer removed from its 2026 congress after she protested against the treatment of Dr Amos.

Dr Tomar said it was not true that the college advocated for “a particular model of care” and she rejected any “allegations of conflicts of interest related to my workplace”.

Read the full news report at the link below.

[Jon Pike @runthinkwrite]

They are both wrong, and they both make the same category error. The both use the word 'performance' to back their demand for research funding, but the female catetgory is not a performance category. It's a sex category.

[#WOMENSART @womensart1]

ENJOY an ARTY summer ☀️ on...
Womensart!
Thank you for following 🧡 xx

[Women's Rights Network - WRN @WomensRightsNet]

1/ Trans ideology is fully embedded in the IWG. At the previous Global Summit in 2022, a session on Transgender Inclusion was stacked with trans rights panellists, such as Madeleine Pape the social scientist who pushed the ‘no presumed advantage to being male’ mantra at the IOC.

The IOC has deleted the ‘Framework’ that allowed males into women’s boxing at Paris’24 but the trans-rights activists are lurking around the Birmingham conference halls. Madeleine Pape has been invited to speak in a session on Advancing Gender Equality in Sport through Policy and Practice. She’s back on the gravy train and now describing herself as ‘researcher specialising in women in sport’. You couldn’t make it up. 

What does the IWG actually do?
2/7

[Bernard Lane @Bernard_Lane]

“[The] prominent examples of ‘no platforming’ that you hear about are very much the tip of the iceberg, and they aren’t the most important thing; they’re just the visible manifestation.

“What’s going on under the surface is discrimination and harassment, campaigns of denunciation, and then, even more insidiously, internal bureaucratic barriers to people carrying out research on sex and gender.

“For every prominent victim of cancel culture, [many more are silenced]. You hear sometimes people saying, ‘Oh, well, this has only happened to a few people.’ It only needs to happen to a few people, because most people are going to keep their heads down rather than have that happen to them.”

This is from Professor Alice Sullivan’s talk at a London conference on Rethinking Youth Gender Medicine.
https://t.co/MMqttDTKzb

[Helen Staniland @helenstaniland]

I mean it's not like we weren't aware that @amnesty had form in this department. Remember this?

[MurrayBlackburnMackenzie @mbmpolicy]

We have written today to the Chairs of Amnesty International UK's Section Board and Charitable Trust.

[Prof. Mark Taubert @ProfMarkTaubert]

Disgust in (Ordinary) Dying? - Observations from an eldery care resident doctor https://t.co/Cc94EEm8KC
In @BMJ_SPCare
@TradSkowronski #AssistedDying

[QueenOfSons @QueenOfSons]

@cazjj @No4167 Exactly. The pectoral muscle can NOT be mammogrammed....

[James Esses @JamesEsses]

🚨Breaking🚨

Last night, in what is significant overreach for a backbench Peer, Hilary Cass sent a document to every single MP and Peer, justifying and defending the puberty blockers trial.

I have posted below the full document for people to read. Here is my initial response:

She comes across as completely biased and her reasoning is flawed.

She states that there is no evidence base to determine safety of puberty blockers but concludes with the categorical statement: “I am not worried about the safety of the children and young people in the trial”.

She explains away risks to infertility and sexual functioning.

She uses warped logic around impact to bone density (claiming that children without puberty blockers will be less socially active and this may cause bone issues regardless).

She downplays the utility of the linkage study.

She speaks glowingly about the “benefit of stopping unwanted puberty”.

She believes the State should give children puberty blockers, otherwise they will get them through the black market.

She is an ideologue masquerading as an independent clinician.

[Biology Rules Ok @OkayBiology]

"The fact is we have won this, we won this argument,
women are defined by biology"

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 FWS v FFS🏳️‍⚧️

[Sheriff Silver @butchpolice]

If sex isn't real, my sex-based rights aren't real.

If sex isn't real, resources for my sex aren't real.

If sex isn't real, sexism isn't real.

[Charlie Walsham @CharlieWalsham_]

Gender ideology will be studied for years to come as a prime example of how effective propaganda, and institutional capture, can persuade millions of people to view a regressive movement as progressive.

[Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence Against Women and Girls @UNSRVAW]

It’s very troubling when certain organizaciones start launching campaigns to discredit and smear other civil society organizations, advocates and institutions for the sole reason that their positions on the rights of women and children do not tally with their own.

This is really the antithesis to the calls that these organizations otherwise make to respect the freedom of everyone of thought, belief (including religious belief); expression, association as well as the duty to protect all humans, including children, against abuse, violence and exploitation. It is also contrary to the principles of a democratic society and of living in one.

These are rights guaranteed to all and not only the ones we like.

Women organization and women rights advocates will bear the brunt of such calls for censorship and exclusion from civic space as they continue to be punished for their views on sex/gender, and for fighting for the wellbeing of their children.

If you as an organizations have concerns about another’s position, the take your adversaries on over the merits of their arguments, the strength of their evidence and their interpretation of laws and standards (or lack of these), but not by denying them their right to speak, associate and advocate.

Such blatant double standards will come back to haunt us all.

[Bev Jackson @BevJacksonAuth]

Amnesty has mutated into a dangerously authoritarian mouthpiece of an anti-women, anti-LGB sect.

I assume one or two gender identity activists wrote its report on what it absurdly calls “anti rights” organizations.

There are four reasons why gender-critical campaigners in the UK have been so successful with very limited funds:

1) We tell the truth. That is more persuasive than lies, insults, threats, and emotional blackmail;
2) The vast majority of the UK public shares our views;
3) Our views reflect UK law, as confirmed by the UK Supreme Court ruling of 16 April 2025;
4) We are constantly growing in numbers, and are determined to continue campaigning until we have restored sanity to public life.

[Sam Morgan @CrunchAlias]

When men claim they are “trans” and use it to bypass women's consent, they have not discovered an identity or a diagnosis; they have discovered an excuse.

[QueenOfSons @QueenOfSons]

@helenstaniland I have had 'Lost in France' in my head since I heard the news! 😔

[Colin Wynter KC @QcWynter]

Given the low numbers (remember, trans-claiming men are a "minority") 1 lockable unit per men's changing room would be sufficient.
Installation costs would thus be modest.
If lockable cubicles are said to provide protection/maintain dignity for women, so too will they for men.

[Rachel Rooney @RooneyRachel]

Samantha Tempest had not read MBIM when he said that the contents of the book made him feel 'like a problem that needed to be solved by education'.
Men like him are a problem- but I didn't cover that in my book.