@RapidResponse47 Trump did not say, “We’re fighting so Iran can’t take out LA or San Diego.” He said, “They could take out a city. Let ’em take out Los Angeles. Let ’em take out San Diego,” and immediately followed it with “This is a very small price to pay.”
Context doesn’t really favor much of his saying, like it doesn’t cleanly match the words he chose. He didn’t explicitly say in that sentence, “If we hadn’t intervened, Iran could have taken out LA.” Instead, he actually used “let them take out”. Like what?
If you actually believe President Donald Trump was saying Iran should “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego, you’re everything wrong with everything.
Context. It matters.
@realDonaldTrump you being the President of the USA, what in the actual fuck are you talking about? How are you letting political ideology dictate your stance on the “lives” of many innocent people who function and have given their all into the system of the US?
Biggest issue in today’s society is lust. A poison that slowly erodes genuine connection and reducing sacred human bonds to temporary hollow transactions.
Obviously, all of this is just personal scrutiny or speculative, hope justice is brought to who genuinely deserves it. As far as how this is going, the student (victim) has a concrete case insofar, and I side with what she’s brought forth in her case. (3/3)
It’s crazy how the most concerning part of the Cornell case isn’t just that the DA initially declined charges, but it’s what apparently never reached him. JD clearly told campus police she resisted specific advances, and evendescribed coercion and incapacitation..(1/3)
…and explicitly said she was raped. Yet the DA says he never saw that interview transcript before deciding no crime occurred. Not to mention the contemporaneous snapchat messages and the defendant’s messages two days afterward. (2/3)
Yeah, but saying thay doesn’t actually imply that this was merely regretful sex. I mean, the issue is whether she consented to the specific acts and participants while they occurred, and whether her level of incapacitation legally prevented consent. Don’t assume the conclusion.
@_Nsznn Ahh yes retards falling for this again because in the end they flip it and take the money from those who invested in it like it happens to others who do it and yet still don’t listen, pump and dump. Crazy morons like drones.
How is @NYCMayor Mamdani not allowed to attend the 9/11 ceremony? The people that don’t want him to attend are utterly racist, nothing more, nothing less.
@worldviewdesign Very detailed work! Despite my limitations on replying on X, all I can say is that there is still an epistemic distinction (how we know something) with an ontological distinction (what something is). Either way, very nice stuff! I appreciate Theism with people like you.