𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗹𝘆 𝗯𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗺𝗲 about IRCC's Express Entry in 2025:
They've hammered French-language proficiency draws all year; 48,000 (+families) ITAs issued, dominating the pool to hit the 8.5% Francophone target outside Quebec (policy goal for linguistic vitality).
But meanwhile:
• 𝗭𝗲𝗿𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗠 𝗱𝗿𝗮𝘄𝘀 (category deprioritized despite ongoing tech/engineering shortages).
• Only 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗿𝗮𝘄 (1,250 ITAs) all year, even though Trades is supposedly a 'priority' category amid screaming construction/labor gaps.
• Healthcare and the Education Category did get some attention, but French draws dwarf everything.
So @CitImmCanada #IRCC, serious question: When you say category-based selection is designed to 'target specific labour market shortages,' does that now include demographic priorities over actual economic ones?
Because right now, it looks like one category is eating the entire pie while high-demand skilled trades gets the crumbs and STEM is left starving🤷♂️
Clients ask me daily why their strong STEM/Trades profiles sit untouched.
The answer? 𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘆 𝘁𝗶𝗹𝘁.
𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲?"
@CitImmCanada@CitImmCanFR@LenaMetlegeDiab@MarkJCarney@MarcMillerVM
If anyone from IRCC noticed, people who are hard working in the STEM category specifically Civil engineers and techs are waiting to hear from you since last year of August for inviting in the category draw #1
𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 ⭐️ RCB PLAYED BOLD! 😇
17 Years, 6256 Days, 90,08,640 Minutes later, the wait finally ends. 🙌🤯
The IPL Trophy is finally coming home. And we CANT KEEP CALM! 🤩😍❤️
December 2024: India's UPI hit 16.73 billion transactions in a single month.
That's more digital payments than the entire US, UK, and China... combined.
Here's how a government project became the world's largest payment system 🧵
Reply-reply khelna tha to khel lete. But this is becoming unnecessarily cheap. You all know we make videos logically and for entertainment, but this isn’t logical or fun anymore so we will be trimming his parts.
Our point in the video proved itself. Legal threats, Spreading fake edited images of a woman, made up trends & directing your audience to go below the belt and abuse someone for a 1-min segment in a 14 mins video.
Even we know our legal rights.
The video wasn't meant to defame anyone but where there is absence of logic, and sense; there is no point arguing.
If you didn't like us using a clip of your mother from a public interview on a mainstream news channel, it's totally understandable.
Sorry to Aunty Ji.
(p.s - we didn't say anything about her, never roasted her, just used a 2-secs news clip about second hand cars)
We are out of this now. ✌🏽