Investment Time Machine mini app. How much would you have if you had invested X dollars Y years ago
https://t.co/QM8H3UD0ri
*Made by Claude
@AnthropicAI@claudeai
Unlock the power of autonomous workflows with Startup School: Agentic AI.
Join @GoogleCloud experts to discover how to build, deploy, and scale sophisticated #AIagents that drive real business impact. Ready to innovate? Register here ➡️ https://t.co/QzUDNTjYzt
@paulg@paulg I have always found misinterpretations and misunderstandings a great source for ideation. Someone shares an idea or innovation and your mind will come up with an alternative by accident, human brain works in fascinating ways!
Don't think of LLMs as entities but as simulators. For example, when exploring a topic, don't ask:
"What do you think about xyz"?
There is no "you". Next time try:
"What would be a good group of people to explore xyz? What would they say?"
The LLM can channel/simulate many perspectives but it hasn't "thought about" xyz for a while and over time and formed its own opinions in the way we're used to. If you force it via the use of "you", it will give you something by adopting a personality embedding vector implied by the statistics of its finetuning data and then simulate that. It's fine to do, but there is a lot less mystique to it than I find people naively attribute to "asking an AI".
AGI is the most important and potentially dangerous technology of our time. OpenAI was right that this technology merits strong structures and incentives to ensure it is developed safely, and is wrong now in attempting to change these structures and incentives.
We're urging the AGs to protect the public and stop this. https://t.co/sgLzd9QACU (2/2)
@ChristinaJCampo@SFMOMA Oh yes! It’s an amazing piece of art! I have seen it more than seven or eight times and every time I had a friend or family member visiting San Francisco, I took them to MoMA just to see this (or at least tried to persuade them!)