The amount of evidence in the bible that disproves the idea of the Son not being able to resurrect himself is astonishing. How can this be a piece of evidence for the divinity of the Son? John 2:19 and John 10:17-18; remember, Jesus does not speak his own words.
@Metaphysicmike We trust the people that compile the scriptures or the “bible” because the exegesis speaks for itself. Trinitarianism is not found in the writings whatsoever, and compiling books that were already used in lists by early Christians did not alter passages in the texts.
@Damascus_light@AleMartnezR1 I don’t really see a reason as to why I would keep up a lengthy discussion with you about this when you’re already assuming that I am proposing ADS as a true notion. Also, a weaker version of DDS cannot imply a logical coherent model of EED with EOs; that’s fallacious.
@MitchEnimigas There is a lot of issues with what you’re saying Mitch, I suggest you do some further reading if this is going to be consuming my time in responding to you on how my argument works and whether it is valid or not. If you wish to further continue DMs on this, let’s do so!
@CertainSpeaks Quite interesting how the stance lays unstable completely though once you accept a Semi-Arian view of Jesus possessing a similar substance like the Father that doesn’t make him Homoousios, but also not heteroousios, so does the Son have a different nature from the Father or same?
@NoahsArk1000 Hitler was terrible, and what has been shown and made known to us proves it. History itself is the evidence, people tend to believe more “outside the box” and blend that in with conspiracy theories that usually have no evidence whatsoever. Hitler is a demon in flesh.
@AleMartnezR1@_code_compiler Correct, numerous scholars acknowledge as well that these early Christians prior to the Council of Nicaea held to a notion different than “eternal generation”. Two-stage logos theory, in which differentiates those patristics with 4th Century Christians, never Nicene theology.
@Crazyflix94 @realMaalouf …even though the nation is more developed. Building infrastructure, sustaining the economy, expanding science, labor, culture, and industry are as essential to a nation as clearing land once was. “Planting trees” is not the only form of nation-building. (3/3)
@Crazyflix94 @realMaalouf …it only changes the conditions they encountered. If you accept that those who arrived in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were immigrants who contributed to building the country, then it follows that immigrants in later centuries also contribute, (2/3)