@DaleJohnsonBBC If you’re interested, you might want to check out https://t.co/4Hbx7FQyY6 I made at the start of the world cup. It too has the full R32 bracket with FIFA’s wonderul Annex C with support for forward and backward predictions :)
Having said that, can’t wait to see you tomorrow @dreamtheaternet ! It’s literally a dream come true, given the fact that I dreamt about it last night. Too many dreams in this post.
I will massively rate Fletcher if he makes himself player-manager and selects a midfield trio of Fletcher, Fletcher and Fletcher. That’s the cojones a United manager needs
🇾🇪 Ratcliffe Said The Quiet Part Out Loud, And Some Won't Like It
Sir Jim Ratcliffe's recent comments about Ruben Amorim and United's direction have sparked the predictable cycle of hot takes, selective outrage, and wilful misinterpretation that's become standard fare in modern football discourse.
But buried beneath the soundbites that will inevitably dominate social media is something far more significant: evidence that someone at Manchester United finally understands how football clubs actually rebuild.
🔴 The Three Year Timeline That Will Trigger Many
"Ruben Amorim needs to demonstrate he is a great coach over three years."
This single sentence will infuriate a significant portion of United's fanbase, and it's worth understanding why. We've become so conditioned to expect immediate results that the mere suggestion of patience sounds like surrender. Three years? In an era where managers get sacked after ten games? Where social media demands solutions before the final whistle even blows?
But here's what critics miss. Ratcliffe is simply acknowledging reality. Liverpool under Klopp and Arsenal under Arteta demonstrated cultural improvement long before consistent results materialised, and recognition of these patterns requires patience and perspective that transcends match-by-match reactions.
Some will inevitably argue that we shouldn’t constantly be referring to Sir Alex's era and comparing then to now. I have said before that we are trapped between glorious past that's increasingly mythologised and a difficult present that's constantly delegitimised. But here's the thing that hasn't changed across eras: you simply cannot build sustainable success on culturally weak foundations.
When Sir Alex arrived in 1986, he understood something his predecessors hadn't, tactical changes and formations meant nothing without cultural transformation. When Klopp rebuilt Liverpool, he followed the same blueprint. His initial months weren't characterised by tactical perfection; his focus instead remained fixed on changing mindsets and establishing non-negotiable standards. Arsenal under Arteta? Same approach. Manchester City's dominance? Built on the same foundations.
The principles aren't outdated, they're timeless. What's changed is our collective willingness to accept them.
1/7
#MUFC #ManchesterUnited #JimRatcliffe
@UtdArts1@UtdArts1 I look forward to your threads all the more after matchdays given your level headed analysis of the bigger picture that affects United as opposed to nitpicking on “tactics” which in my opinion are so overrated in comparison to the culture transition our team is in!
Investing 15 hrs to reach Kanteerava & support a club that we love from our heart @bengalurufc 💙 - this will never change, but every BFC fan deserve better.
This is the real struggle while traveling back to Pune. Hope you understand and take the needed steps. @ParthJindal11
@UtdArena Nothing will change with Ten Hag or any other manager in the world unless we look beyond our past glory and the club runs primarily as a professional football club and a commercial outfit only secondary. Can we call ourselves a project?
@UtdArena Back when City became rich, their owners prominently marketed the City *project*. The word project carried was scorned at and even ridiculed by United fans and other supporters. Ironically we find ourselves desperately in the need of one.