@stoolpresidente as someone who follows the WNBA, I would love your opinion on this. What is the absolute need for some WNBA fans to make believe Angel Reese is a star? I understand a lot of her fans dislike Caitlin Clark, but the elevation of Angel does not affect Caitlin Clark. It affects the other front court players who quite frankly deserve more accolades than they get. While these statistics are obviously short term, I think they speak a lot to who is valuable and who is not so much. Both Angel Reese and Caitlin Clark were drafted and started playing in 2024. In 2023 Indianapolis had a winning percentage of 325. Caitlin Clark was drafted and began playing in 2024. That year the winning percentage of Indianapolis was 500. They got better. In 2025 the winning percentage was 545. They got better again. In 2026 so far this year, the winning percentage is 630. Better again. Now let's look at Angel Reese. In 2023 ,Chicago's winning percentage was 450. They drafted Angel Reese and in 2024 their winning percentage was 325. They got worse. In 2025 their winning percentage was 227. They got worse again. Chicago traded Angel Reese and funny enough. They're winning percentage this year is 346. They got better after they traded her away. In 2025 Atlanta's winning percentage was 682. They traded for Angel Reese and this year so far their winning percentage is 615. Worse! For their first three years in the week, Caitlin Clark has improved her team every year and Angel Reese has done the opposite. I would love to hear your thoughts.
This is exactly why the conversation is going nowhere.
The argument is not that Vance is “anti-Israel because he compared Israel to France and the U.K.” That is a strawman designed to make every criticism of his rhetoric sound hysterical.
The concern is that the sitting Vice President publicly alleged that members of an allied government were financing a malicious campaign against him, offered no evidence the public could evaluate. That is not ordinary disagreement between allies. It is a serious accusation with diplomatic consequences.
Maybe the accusation is true. Maybe it is false. But the answer is not to deliberately replace the actual question with a weaker one and then mock it.
The actual questions are:
Who specifically was he accusing?
What evidence does he have?
Was this activity directed or authorized by the Israeli government?
Why make the allegation publicly if he cannot substantiate it publicly?
And what does this rhetoric reveal about his broader understanding of alliances, state power, and American foreign policy?
You can defend Vance’s position. You can argue that Israel deserves criticism. You can even argue that the alliance should be reconsidered. But first you have to address what he actually said.
Reducing every substantive concern to “you called him anti-Israel” is not an argument. It is a deflection. And this endless cycle of accusation, strawman, and mockery is precisely why the right is becoming incapable of having an honest conversation about what its own leaders believe.
This is exactly why the conversation is going nowhere.
The argument is not that Vance is “anti-Israel because he compared Israel to France and the U.K.” That is a strawman designed to make every criticism of his rhetoric sound hysterical.
The concern is that the sitting Vice President publicly alleged that members of an allied government were financing a malicious campaign against him, offered no evidence the public could evaluate. That is not ordinary disagreement between allies. It is a serious accusation with diplomatic consequences.
Maybe the accusation is true. Maybe it is false. But the answer is not to deliberately replace the actual question with a weaker one and then mock it.
The actual questions are:
Who specifically was he accusing?
What evidence does he have?
Was this activity directed or authorized by the Israeli government?
Why make the allegation publicly if he cannot substantiate it publicly?
And what does this rhetoric reveal about his broader understanding of alliances, state power, and American foreign policy?
You can defend Vance’s position. You can argue that Israel deserves criticism. You can even argue that the alliance should be reconsidered. But first you have to address what he actually said.
Reducing every substantive concern to “you called him anti-Israel” is not an argument. It is a deflection. And this endless cycle of accusation, strawman, and mockery is precisely why the right is becoming incapable of having an honest conversation about what its own leaders believe.
Our problem is not bad Republicans in general. Our problem is small majorities and you can't get much done with small majorities when you have a handful of RINOs that are blocking everything.
So instead of throwing up our hands and saying a pox on all their houses, let's get out there and let's get a bigger majority so these RINOs no longer count.
We know COMMUNIST CHINA uses Uyghur SLAVE LABOR. We know they make more dangerous generic drugs than the ones we produce here. It’s unacceptable.
It’s time to take action to stop the human rights abuses and keep American patients SAFE.
That’s why, as Chairman of @SenateAging, I’m encouraging the Trump administration to raise tariffs on the Chinese generic drug makers behind this despicable practice.
These criminal thugs need to be held accountable.
Those who took $1 billion a year from Western taxpayers to poison the minds of Palestinian children need to be held accountable. Someone needs to go to prison.
A reminder who Erdogan is: He shelters Hamas, fuels sickening antisemitic incitement and repeated Holocaust distortion, and leads a regime accused of grave war crimes abuses against Kurds, Yazidis and brutal repression at home in Turkey. He is no ally.
#BernieSanders will back any rapist, any terrorist, any pro-Hamas radical, any antisemite, even a neo-Nazi, if they are against Israel. He is a very evil man. @BernieSanders@SenSanders
Candace Owens is an IQ test. If you watch Candace and come away thinking that you are smarter, better informed, or more moral...you are retarded. If you echo or excuse her evil and vicious stupidity...you are worse than retarded.
Don't be retarded.
On America's 250th, we celebrate our great nation and recommit ourselves to the fight against the barbarians seeking to destroy us from within.
We will never let them win!
This is America, and we will keep it that way.
Let freedom ring, FL-06! 🇺🇸
Imagine how much Russian, Chinese, and Iranian money is flooding into media and content creation right now.
The multipolar communist/Islamists are desperate to defeat Trump and are paying people like Ian Carroll to betray their country.
This argument is retarded.
Pakistani rape gangs VASTLY outnumber native ones, and are a 1000% preventable phenomenon which only exists thanks to open borders.
The presence of white criminals doesn't mean Britain should accept migrants from literal rape cultures.
What the hell.
If Elon Musk decided “enough is enough” and shut down Tesla, SpaceX, and Starlink, politicians would discover pretty quickly that jobs, innovation, and tax revenue don’t come from press releases. They come from businesses that employ people, build things, and take risks. Kill the goose, and eventually you run out of eggs.
If we deported all illegal aliens, home prices would fall between 20%-30%.
If we deported all illegal aliens, ER wait times would drop.
If we deported all illegal aliens, insurance costs would drop.
If we deported all illegal aliens, we could give more Americans healthcare.
If we deported all illegal aliens, crime would drop.
If we deported all illegal aliens, traffic woild decrease.
Every single thing in American life would get better if we deported all illegal aliens.
So why don’t you support it?