@sarisofficial We were on hold for 5 hours and then were cut off. Couldn’t leave a message. Emailed you, no actual response. I can’t believe your support is this bad. Please help!
Update: I have spoken with three people with knowledge of Fox's ouster of Tucker Carlson
They say Carlson's digital exchanges captured by the Dominion legal team echo the suite of concerns alleged by his ex producer - that his show's workplace was defined by sexism and bigotry.
@FriesenPastor @AnnaSieges So what you're saying is we don't have the inerrant word of God, but must use an ever-evolving set of techniques to make educated guesses as to what it was?
@uav_guy_79 @Masks4Life @TaylorRMarshall It's funny that you accuse others of naivety and then say archeology is a "very new field." Exactly when do you think the field began. The archeologists of the 19th century would love to know.
@uav_guy_79 @Masks4Life @TaylorRMarshall Tired old? Vs mosaical authorship? Lol. And I didn't say JEPD, you did.
At the end of the day, I'm open to following the evidence, wherever it leads.
Are you?
@uav_guy_79 @Masks4Life @TaylorRMarshall Also, the fact that many people in the past agreed with a proposition doesn't mean that proposition is true. Where did you get this idea? Our existing beliefs about science and history are under constant assault by new evidence. Why would you assume people in the past were right?
@maximilianog@DrFrankTurek The more interesting question is: why are you certain Jesus wasn't just a charasmatic religious leader who was simply mistaken in his belief about equality with God?
@maximilianog@DrFrankTurek I think the Dalai Lama is deluded about reincarnation, but no reasonable person would consider him a madman. If delusion is the sole requirement for fitting into the same category as a mad man, then this category includes 2/3rds of the world. Which hardly seems reasonable.
@maximilianog@DrFrankTurek There is a category distinct from a madman which is a charasmatic religious leader who believe they alone have a special relationship to God. This is why your trilema is disingenuous - it makes the correct category seem untenable.
@maximilianog@DrFrankTurek No one would describe them as a charlatan nor a madman. Plenty of honest religious people make fantastical claims (reincarnation, etc) and we don't describe them as such. But we consider them mistaken about reality.
Isn't this a valid option given the facts?
@maximilianog@DrFrankTurek We know what a trilema is. Your trilema is invalid because it does not convey all of the options in an honest manner. It is a logical fallacy. Does that matter to you?